Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

[Tragi-Chan]

@trombonista
New comic
View attachment 683993
View attachment 683992

Oh look, it's the Rat King's favourite superhero, Straw Man! In his most recent issue, he developed the power of invisibility because Labelle is too fucking lazy to draw a figure twice. Alright, well, let's look at this.

PANEL 1: The argument against trans athletes is specifically against trans women rather than all trans people. Trans women, being biologically male, naturally have a larger build, stronger musculature and denser bones than natal women, advantages which are not altered by HRT. Thus, they have an unfair advantage over natal women and in the case of some sports, such as MMA or boxing, they physically endanger their opponents. I haven't heard anyone arguing against trans men competing against natal men, because they're at a natural disadvantage. The use of the words "would beat everyone" is quite sly, implying that the other athletes are sore losers rather than the victims of a technicality.

PANEL 2: Nobody asked for trans people to be banned from the military because they're "weak and useless." The argument was that the special requirements for trans people (e.g. medical care) are not justifiable in terms of resources.

So basically, this is some pretty bad writing. Satire often involves exaggerating points or selectively wording statements in order to make a joke, but this doesn't even do that. The joke doesn't work at all, relying as it does on a complete misunderstanding or mischaracterisation of the trans military ban. Any good writer would have abandoned that joke and thought up a new one. This gives us a real insight into Labelle's creative process. Just go with the first thing she thinks of, make a bare minimum comic strip, eat poutine and retouch selfies for remaining 23 hours 50 minutes of the day. That's the kind of respect she has for her readers.

 

[Zarkov]

@trombonista
New comic
View attachment 681172

I like how he equates not being able to marry the person you love with not being able to use your restroom of choice.

 

[August16]

Have we really reached the 2 panel comics stage? :/

At this rate there soon won't be anything to laugh at. The "no panel comic" stage.

 

[Pickle Inspector]

Oh look, it's the Rat King's favourite superhero, Straw Man! In his most recent issue, he developed the power of invisibility because Labelle is too fucking lazy to draw a figure twice. Alright, well, let's look at this.

PANEL 1: The argument against trans athletes is specifically against trans women rather than all trans people. Trans women, being biologically male, naturally have a larger build, stronger musculature and denser bones than natal women, advantages which are not altered by HRT. Thus, they have an unfair advantage over natal women and in the case of some sports, such as MMA or boxing, they physically endanger their opponents. I haven't heard anyone arguing against trans men competing against natal men, because they're at a natural disadvantage. The use of the words "would beat everyone" is quite sly, implying that the other athletes are sore losers rather than the victims of a technicality.

PANEL 2: Nobody asked for trans people to be banned from the military because they're "weak and useless." The argument was that the special requirements for trans people (e.g. medical care) are not justifiable in terms of resources.

So basically, this is some pretty bad writing. Satire often involves exaggerating points or selectively wording statements in order to make a joke, but this doesn't even do that. The joke doesn't work at all, relying as it does on a complete misunderstanding or mischaracterisation of the trans military ban. Any good writer would have abandoned that joke and thought up a new one. This gives us a real insight into Labelle's creative process. Just go with the first thing she thinks of, make a bare minimum comic strip, eat poutine and retouch selfies for remaining 23 hours 50 minutes of the day. That's the kind of respect she has for her readers.

I’m not even sure Labelle means for his comic to convince anyone who doesn’t already believe, it’s like those boring one note political comics where the joke is “We are smart, the other side are dumb!”, it’s a feel good hugbox for troons.

Have we really reached the 2 panel comics stage? :/

At this rate there soon won't be anything to laugh at. The "no panel comic" stage.

I’m sure we’ll get the bare minimum that lets allows Labelle to sell merchandise/zines and keep up his around the world tour.

I bet Billy hopes his Ciel book is so popular he can give up comics though.

 

[edibleBulimia]

Have we really reached the 2 panel comics stage? :/

At this rate there soon won't be anything to laugh at. The "no panel comic" stage.

Yep. That “suck my dick” comic was the climax of Assigned Male. Now all we get is boring sperging .

 

[Tragi-Chan]

I’m sure we’ll get the bare minimum that lets allows Labelle to sell merchandise/zines and keep up his around the world tour.

I bet Billy hopes his Ciel book is so popular he can give up comics though.

We’re already at the stage where reposts and new material are indistinguishable. Coupled with all the reworking of old material, and I honestly think AM will end within the next couple of years. Not officially, but there will be bigger and bigger gaps between episodes, more side projects, more “tours” and more reworking of old strips. The ratio of reposts to new material will shift even further towards the former. And eventually new material will just stop coming altogether.

 

[Goddessoftheshire]

Yep. That “suck my dick” comic was the climax of Assigned Male. Now all we get is boring sperging .

Oddly it was the one and only time his Mary Sue sounded like a normal middle school aged kid.

 

[Amber the Hedgehog]

Nice try but these aren’t related issues and as such this comic makes little sense. Just because both happen transgenders becouse of them being trans doesn’t mean that the reasons is actually related.


Panel 1. Men and women have such huge differences in both average and maximum performance that they can’t compete with each others. Even average guy is likely to beat a really good woman. To allow hard working women to win, to measure their performance to equal pears and be safe in contact sports we have gender segregated.

I think that medically transitioned transpeople shouldn’t compete with cissies becouse they are using hormones and other medication that hardcore alters their performance. Affecting ones sports abilities might not have been their main reason for doing so but it’s still the result. We disqualify many others that use medication that unfairly impacts their abilities why would transpeople be any different? Especially when what the FtMs are using is very similar to that of past doping scandals. MtF we don’t know that well because it’s fairly new and not yet studied well. There are how ever strong indicators that MtF do keep quite large male compative advantage over women.

I have nothing against non medically transitioned trannies competing with their biological sex. I get choice between that sports career and transitioning might be a hard one but most professional athletes have done huge sacrifices for their carees so my sympathies aren’t that large. If they choose to transition, well, nobody would have anything against trannies having their own trans legue like paraolympics. Also nothing stops anyone from having sports hobbies just because they cannot officially compete.

Panel 2. Active military personnels for large number of reasons shouldn’t be dependent on medication or have chronic illness or issues. Especially if they are on active battlefield. Military can’t guaranteed access to medical treatments in field and if can’t function you are a burden. Also military careers tend be high tress, many former soldiers suffering multitude of mental issues related to their time in service. There is already an epidemic of suicide, why would military want people who are even before entering high risk? They don’t and so no thanks trannies because trans is connected to high suicide rates.


So to sum up. Sports don’t want trannies because of their medical treatments affects on performance and military doesn’t want trannies because of mental health issues pose too large of a safety risk. Two very separate things kids.

 

[Wabbu]

@trombonista
New comic
View attachment 683993
View attachment 683992

This would mean something if Stephie was a character into sports or joining the military.
And not just a talking point.

 

[Next Task]

The joke doesn't work at all, relying as it does on a complete misunderstanding or mischaracterisation of the trans military ban.

Rated optimistic for thinking there's meant to be a joke.

 

[AnOminous]

Oddly it was the one and only time his Mary Sue sounded like a normal middle school aged kid.

It was pretty counterproductive of whoever went after that to get Bill a Facebook fan. Good job asshole. The comic would at least be funnier and maybe better if any of it was remotely genuine and not just performative attention whoring bullshit.

 

[Video Games]

I think... I think I could replace Labelle at this rate.

 

[queue-anon]

Panel 2. Active military personnels for large number of reasons shouldn’t be dependent on medication or have chronic illness or issues. Especially if they are on active battlefield. Military can’t guaranteed access to medical treatments in field and if can’t function you are a burden. Also military careers tend be high tress, many former soldiers suffering multitude of mental issues related to their time in service. There is already an epidemic of suicide, why would military want people who are even before entering high risk? They don’t and so no thanks trannies because trans is connected to high suicide rates.

Troons: "Give us everything we want or we'll commit suicide!"
Also troons: "We're stable and sane enough to serve honorably in the armed forces!"

Pick one.

If enablers manage to cram troons down the U.S. armed forces' maw, I predict the next mass killing of innocent civilians on a par with that guy who went batshit in Afghanistan will be perpetrated by a troon.

 

[Sobble]

I like how he equates not being able to marry the person you love with not being able to use your restroom of choice.

Here's the thing though, in Canada (which is where he lives), the only grounds for divorce are abuse, adultery, and 'total breakdown of the marriage' - which is usually demonstrated by living separately for one year. Your partner coming out as trans is absolutely not grounds for divorce in the eyes of the law and there's literally no legal way to divorce your partner 'for being trans'. It's a complete fabrication.

However, I guarantee you there's something on the books along the lines of, 'if you transition/change your name, you need to have your old marriage certificate annulled and have a new one issued that connects to your current legal identity'. He just thinks that the government requiring important legal documents (to say nothing of joint assets or deeds for property) to be connected to an existing, definable person is, y'know, actual fascism.

The other possibility is that transition might not be allowed by someone's church (i.e. 'if you transition, the church will anull the religious part of your marriage'), and whether or not you agree with that, people have the right to practice their religion, we've kinda already decided that.

...also bathrooms are sex-segregated, not gender segregated, nice try.

 

[queue-anon]

Here's the thing though, in Canada (which is where he lives), the only grounds for divorce are abuse, adultery, and 'total breakdown of the marriage' - which is usually demonstrated by living separately for one year. Your partner coming out as trans is absolutely not grounds for divorce in the eyes of the law and there's literally no legal way to divorce your partner 'for being trans'. It's a complete fabrication.

However, I guarantee you there's something on the books along the lines of, 'if you transition/change your name, you need to have your old marriage certificate annulled and have a new one issued that connects to your current legal identity'. He just thinks that the government requiring important legal documents (to say nothing of joint assets or deeds for property) to be connected to an existing, definable person is, y'know, actual fascism.

The other possibility is that transition might not be allowed by someone's church (i.e. 'if you transition, the church will anull the religious part of your marriage'), and whether or not you agree with that, people have the right to practice their religion, we've kinda already decided that.

...also bathrooms are sex-segregated, not gender segregated, nice try.

There are places that give the other spouse an out when one spouse troons out. The UK still has that law on the books, although troons want to overturn it. It's no longer mandatory divorce (I think it might have been in the past). It's just a completely reasonable allowance for the cissy to bail when his/her (usually her) spouse changes the terms of the marriage.

 

[Rubberchickenchu]

@trombonista
New comic

Recycling a joke from last month in a single pannel

@trombonista new comic
You weren't expecting it so early but today, we've got a totally original comic with brand new jokes.
And the strawmen are getting even stronger now they've discovered the power of invisibility.
View attachment 646872
View attachment 646871

 

[Pickle Inspector]

Damn you disembodied straw person of indeterminate gender!

 

[Sobble]

There are places that give the other spouse an out when one spouse troons out. The UK still has that law on the books, although troons want to overturn it. It's no longer mandatory divorce (I think it might have been in the past). It's just a completely reasonable allowance for the cissy to bail when his/her (usually her) spouse changes the terms of the marriage.

Ah, fair enough. I suppose I was focusing on Canada, since he really has nothing to complain about here.

Still, wouldn’t the mandatory divorce thing validate troons, rather than the opposite? After all, shouldn’t a dude’s girldick absolutely repulse his (presumably) straight wife the second he comes out? Also, since (according to troon logic) his previous identity no longer exists and literally never did, how can he justify staying married, since the relationship was nothing but constantly lying (to himself and his spouse) and coercion at best?

 

[CWCissey]

Seems there's the same amount of strips as there are genders these days, two.

 

[Ann Berlin]

There are places that give the other spouse an out when one spouse troons out. The UK still has that law on the books, although troons want to overturn it. It's no longer mandatory divorce (I think it might have been in the past). It's just a completely reasonable allowance for the cissy to bail when his/her (usually her) spouse changes the terms of the marriage.

I've read stories where trans widows (ex-spouses of a trans partner) had to nullify their formerly heterosexual marriage by pointing out that back when the couple got married, same-sex marriage was illegal. So if their partner claims to have been legally a woman all along, they didn't truly get married in the eyes of the law. It's sad on multiple levels if you think about it.
(edited for clarity because I confused myself)