Shy Hard 2: Shy Harder

He's an obsessive damaged psycho who has decided that everything he thinks is correct and all of his misfortunes are from everybody being shit but himself. He IS a product of modern society, but in the most ironic way possible: he is the embodiment of today's lack of accountability, a true "special snowflake" that can never be wrong or misinformed. That his parents haven't whipped some discipline into him speaks of their enabling of his insanity as well. (Fun fact: he beat them up after his mom wouldn't have sex with him, totally her fault btw).

Oh, that's right, I forgot about that. Man, this guy is the epitome of pathetic loser. You just know he's going to be a virgin with rage all his life.
 
Also, regarding my quote you find unreasonable - just ask my two ex gf's.
You don't even know what the idea is. It is not even an idea, just deprivation x in time period y.

All other nonsense about "entitlements" and other things are your indoctrination.
Rapists are wonderful angels to modern women.

are you saying you're incel because you have not raped anyone recently?

also saying sex is rape is a pretty strong sjw or feminist stance to take. good for you!
 
Here is his manifesto. It includes a photograph of massacred children.
I'm not gonna read all that shit. But I read bits and pieces and I can even say I agree with some of it. I can see where he's coming from at least. He has a lot of the right pieces, but his anger prevents him from putting them all together.
He made an excuse for his insecurity, gave it a label and built a narrative around why he can't do anything to fix it. Or, he could do something to fix it, but feels doing so would lower himself?
he is the embodiment of today's lack of accountability, a true "special snowflake" that can never be wrong or misinformed.
There we go.
 
Oh, that's right, I forgot about that. Man, this guy is the epitome of pathetic loser. You just know he's going to be a virgin with rage all his life.
IMHO he's worse than that. The archetypal "pathetic loser" suggests a somewhat dopey but otherwise likeable and innocuous misfit. Marjan is just utterly revolting. He'd be more frightening if he wasn't a completely impotent failure; as it stands, his greatest action for change was getting busted for dancing naked on the steps of a courthouse in his hometown Zagreb with a drum.

Yeah, perfectly stable.
 
IMHO he's worse than that. The archetypal "pathetic loser" suggests a somewhat dopey but otherwise likeable and innocuous misfit. Marjan is just utterly revolting. He'd be more frightening if he wasn't a completely impotent failure; as it stands, his greatest action for change was getting busted for dancing naked on the steps of a courthouse in his hometown Zagreb with a drum.

Yeah, perfectly stable.

Man, it sure is a wonder that he's still single.
 
IMHO he's worse than that. The archetypal "pathetic loser" suggests a somewhat dopey but otherwise likeable and innocuous misfit. Marjan is just utterly revolting. He'd be more frightening if he wasn't a completely impotent failure; as it stands, his greatest action for change was getting busted for dancing naked on the steps of a courthouse in his hometown Zagreb with a drum.

Yeah, perfectly stable.
Someone link to some pics or preferably video of the guy. Let's see if he's as comfortable as he claims.
 
lol Black Sonichu has been going back through this thread and the Elliot Rodgers thread and giving me "Dumb" ratings for months old posts where I say it's not society's fault some psycho loser can't get laid and kills a bunch of people
 
Which dictionary? Cite something for us. Be exact. Language is a fluid thing, and interpretation can vary widely. I want to hear it in your own words and eliminate any confusion or ambiguity.

Any dictionary. You want me to find the first one I can and post it here? That's idiotic.

How soon are we talking? 5 years? 10 years? Never?

"Soon" can be quite a long time, when compared to other things, when we're talking about such important changes that will actually make rape the only way of procreating. I'm guessing it will become dominant in about 10-15 years, when even more retards and even worse retards come of age, and that it will become fully accepted in about 20 years. What will soon follow will be making consensual sex frowned upon, and it time possibly illegal, because women always follow the dominant pattern.



Why would she abort a child when she wishes to keep it?

Fine, she can give birth to a rape ape, but that is her choice then. It's not outside of her choice like that idiot claims.

Not all rapists have "bad genetics". If a professional football player rapes a chick, he's committing a crime but he's not "passing on bad genes".

Yes, not all rapists have bad genetics but most do. Football players you're talking about don't usually even need to rape.

On the other hand, everybody with any sort of good genetics outside of religion of positions of power and wealth is incel.

Rapists are not evolutionarily successful in a society that has things like birth control and abortion. For a rapist to get a woman pregnant he'd have to rape her multiple times over a period of some time. And even then, she may not keep the child. Most children are born to people who had voluntary sex with one another, so your argument is flawed.

You're just mad you can't get laid or have a relationship, so you are making all guys who are capable of this out to be rapists to make yourself feel better.

This implies that women don't want rape ape kids, which isn't true. You can't believe in one set of standards (seduction based society) but still apply the obsolete set of standards for other things (women not wanting rape apes).

Nobody in the West can have a relationship and I can have sex with a prostitute so I don't see your point.

Here is his manifesto. It includes a photograph of massacred children.

Those massacred children are decent children. They are massacred by liberalism.

Like I told a commentator on my blog, I know many modern women in faux marriages with who purposely aborted their children when they found out they weren't fathered by retards but by their beta husbands.

Women are the worst criminals in the world, they are genocidal maniacs.

Your problem is the insecurity you have inside that says you need a serious and committed relationship.

Is there really any point in reading on?

You make two crazy assertions in one short sentence 1. That insecurity makes people want to have the basic forming structure of things like families

2. That relationships exist in the West. They don't.

He's an obsessive damaged psycho who has decided that everything he thinks is correct

I haven't decided that. Facts did.

Hd all of his misfortunes are from everybody being shit but himself.

Could you explain why this isn't the case, seeing as even both of my exes agree? Use actual examples from my life, not bs phrases,

He IS a product of modern society, but in the most ironic way possible: he is the embodiment of today's lack of accountability, a true "special snowflake" that can never be wrong or misinformed.

Accountability for what?

Not being a seductive scumbag?

Seriously, tell me what I did wrong. Nobody can tell me that at all.

I went on a lot of dates and acted civilly. But I wasn't a retarded ape and that is a crime to sluts-

You're blaming me for not being an idiot who seduces women. Nothing more.

And to make things worse, you don't even want to admit that men like me, who can't use seduction, have to use rape and violence. It's their only way out.

That his parents haven't whipped some discipline into him speaks of their enabling of his insanity as well.

Discipline to do what? Go to work so I can pay for seducer scum and rape of women?

Ok. Give me your wife and half of your pay each month. Is that a fair deal? You want it from me.

(Fun fact: he beat them up after his mom wouldn't have sex with him, totally her fault btw).

This would be fun, if it were a fact. I beat my whore murderous mother months after for child abuse. You're talking about two diffrent incidents because you were fathered by a seducer and a slut so you're too stupid to read.

And stop claiming I wanted to dox you or made articles about you. Anybody taking a brief look at my blog can see that's just another lie.[/QUOTE]

are you saying you're incel because you have not raped anyone recently?

It is partially so, yes. But rape is a good thing for modern Western women and liked by them.


also saying sex is rape is a pretty strong sjw or feminist stance to take. good for you!

Not all sex is rape. But in a feminist society women lose attraction for men who seek consent because just fucking them without it shows you're stupid enough to be attractive.

Man, this guy is the epitome of pathetic loser. You just know he's going to be a virgin with rage all his life.

Except that what he's saying isn't true and I'm not a virgin at all.

I am just not a rapist who beats and mutilates women. That's why I was unsuccessful. Still, better to do that than seduce them.

I'm not gonna read all that shit. But I read bits and pieces and I can even say I agree with some of it. I can see where he's coming from at least. He has a lot of the right pieces, but his anger prevents him from putting them all together.

So what would be putting it all together?

You do understand what I'd need to do to be successful? Their legs would need to be broken, their teeth shattered.

He made an excuse for his insecurity, gave it a label and built a narrative around why he can't do anything to fix it. Or, he could do something to fix it, but feels doing so would lower himself?

There we go.

There is no "insecurity", you moron. Women didn't reject me for being insecure, they rejected me for treating them like human beings and wanting a serious relationship in times when both of these things are hated.

"Fixing" it would indeed lower myself, but I can't fix it my starting to think like an ape.

I can fix it by acting like one. Anybody can use fists and teeth. To simply not care about anything than brutal fucking would require me having parents who were like that. But I wasn't born in the femisphere since the place of my birth wasn't femisphere in late 80s.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any dictionary. You want me to find the first one I can and post it here? That's idiotic.



"Soon" can be quite a long time, when compared to other things, when we're talking about such important changes that will actually make rape the only way of procreating. I'm guessing it will become dominant in about 10-15 years, when even more retards and even worse retards come of age, and that it will become fully accepted in about 20 years. What will soon follow will be making consensual sex frowned upon, and it time possibly illegal, because women always follow the dominant pattern.





Fine, she can give birth to a rape ape, but that is her choice then. It's not outside of her choice like that idiot claims.



Yes, not all rapists have bad genetics but most do. Football players you're talking about don't usually even need to rape.

On the other hand, everybody with any sort of good genetics outside of religion of positions of power and wealth is incel.



This implies that women don't want rape ape kids, which isn't true. You can't believe in one set of standards (seduction based society) but still apply the obsolete set of standards for other things (women not wanting rape apes).

Nobody in the West can have a relationship and I can have sex with a prostitute so I don't see your point.



Those massacred children are decent children. They are massacred by liberalism.

Like I told a commentator on my blog, I know many modern women in faux marriages with who purposely aborted their children when they found out they weren't fathered by retards but by their beta husbands.

Women are the worst criminals in the world, they are genocidal maniacs.



Is there really any point in reading on?

You make two crazy assertions in one short sentence 1. That insecurity makes people want to have the basic forming structure of things like families

2. That relationships exist in the West. They don't.





It is partially so, yes. But rape is a good thing for modern Western women and liked by them.




Not all sex is rape. But in a feminist society women lose attraction for men who seek consent because just fucking them without it shows you're stupid enough to be attractive.



Except that what he's saying isn't true and I'm not a virgin at all.

I am just not a rapist who beats and mutilates women. That's why I was unsuccessful. Still, better to do that than seduce them.

Goddamn son, you need to get laid.
 
I'd say don't post repeatedly in succession because it's really obnoxious, but really, I don't think it's possible for you to get much more obnoxious.

"Soon" can be quite a long time, when compared to other things, when we're talking about such important changes that will actually make rape the only way of procreating. I'm guessing it will become dominant in about 10-15 years, when even more retards and even worse retards come of age, and that it will become fully accepted in about 20 years. What will soon follow will be making consensual sex frowned upon, and it time possibly illegal, because women always follow the dominant pattern.

In 20 years time I'm going to look back on this post and laugh.

Except that what he's saying isn't true and I'm not a virgin at all.

I am just not a rapist who beats and mutilates women. That's why I was unsuccessful. Still, better to do that than seduce them.

And I suppose you're too much of a Nice Guy to rape someone?

There is no "insecurity", you moron. Women didn't reject me for being insecure, they rejected me for treating them like human beings and wanting a serious relationship in times when both of these things are hated.

Your posts have shown that never in your life have you ever treated a woman like a human being. The reason that women keep rejecting you is because you're kind of a misogynistic psycho who thinks that rape will one day be legal.
 
MerriedMan, you're a good example of what I'm talking about - a completely idiotic male who gets women due to stupidity.

In 20 years time I'm going to look back on this post and laugh.

You are wrong.

And I suppose you're too much of a Nice Guy to rape someone?

I never used the term and don't consider myself that at all. I haven't raped anybody yet because I was brainwashed by modern society about its definition and how women perceive it.

I believed that rape is forceful sex against a woman's consent. I was wrong, since I didn't know enough history and was brainwashed my feminist propaganda. Rape is a crime against women's owner or her chastity and consent is irrelevant for women. In fact, should you expect it you're bound to be seen as a complete loser by a woman. All that anti-rape propaganda is actually aimed to keep dumbasses who believe women even want to consent away from getting any sex whatsoever.

So while I'd still forcibly have a sex with a woman I'd never rape, since I wouldn't have forcible sex with a woman who is somebody's property or chaste.


Your posts have shown that never in your life have you ever treated a woman like a human being. The reason that women keep rejecting you is because you're kind of a misogynistic psycho who thinks that rape will one day be legal.

In fact, my posts say completely the opposite. I've posted at least 2 accounts of my life. Both show I treated women well but they were disgusted by my decency.

This is something both of my 2 ex girlfriends readily admit. They admit they were disgusted by me being good to them and by wanting a relationship they couldn't comprehend.

The reason that women keep rejecting you is because you're kind of a misogynistic psycho who thinks that rape will one day be legal.

All the women who rejected me did so before I realized these facts. Of course, one could make an idiotic claim that I always "had it in me" but using that nonsense you could blame anybody for anything that happened to them in the past because of what they did decades later. It's crazy.[/QUOTE]

Out of curiosity, how do lesbians and/or asexual women fit into your worldview? They aren't interested in any type of man, whether "decent" or otherwise.

I have nothing against them but my post are directed at heterosexual males and females. As for lesbians, I really feel for the lesbian incels, since they're the only true female incels beside extremely ill or disfigured straight women. We have a female lesbian incel on LS. com and she is one of the biggest misogynists there because she realizes women are shit. However, I don't know anything about lesbian dynamics so I don't write about them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have nothing against them but my post are directed at heterosexual males and females. As for lesbians, I really feel for the lesbian incels, since they're the only true female incels beside extremely ill or disfigured straight women. We have a female lesbian incel on LS. com and she is one of the biggest misogynists there because she realizes women are shit. However, I don't know anything about lesbian dynamics so I don't write about them.

So any data that doesn't support your preconceived biases ("All Women Are Like That") is dismissed without consideration for larger ramifications within your sociological hypothesis.

do you even science.jpg
 
So any data that doesn't support your preconceived biases ("All Women Are Like That") is dismissed without consideration for larger ramifications within your sociological hypothesis.

What data? I wouldn't reject any data that's true, but what's crucial is interpreting it correctly. I have data that confirms my ideas, would you reject that? Have you read my March 19 post, that lists books I used to understand reality? Also, how in fucking hell did you conclude all this from my post on lesbians and asexuals?[/QUOTE]
 
You are wrong.

Well, I'll tell you what, I'll mark the date on my calendar. In 20 years, we'll see which of us was right.

It won't be you.



In fact, my posts say completely the opposite. I've posted at least 2 accounts of my life. Both show I treated women well but they were disgusted by my decency.

Oh, I can see that arguing with you is going to be like arguing with TJ Church. You're not as endearing as TJ though, just kind of angry and pathetic.

I never used the term and don't consider myself that at all. I haven't raped anybody yet because I was brainwashed by modern society about its definition and how women perceive it.

I believed that rape is forceful sex against a woman's consent. I was wrong, since I didn't know enough history and was brainwashed my feminist propaganda. Rape is a crime against women's owner or her chastity and consent is irrelevant for women. In fact, should you expect it you're bound to be seen as a complete loser by a woman. All that anti-rape propaganda is actually aimed to keep dumbasses who believe women even want to consent away from getting any sex whatsoever.

So while I'd still forcibly have a sex with a woman I'd never rape, since I wouldn't have forcible sex with a woman who is somebody's property or chaste.

And how long has this been going on for? Who's behind it?
 
Well, I'll tell you what, I'll mark the date on my calendar. In 20 years, we'll see which of us was right.

What I regret is not being alive to see it.

Oh, I can see that arguing with you is going to be like arguing with TJ Church. You're not as endearing as TJ though, just kind of angry and pathetic.

A typical liberal moron. I tell you the truth, which is that no woman in my life can hold anything against me at all aside from being treated like a human being (which the mainstream society lies women want) and all I get are insults.

No, seriously. Nobody ever told me what I did wrong with any woman, including those women themselves, aside from not acting like a jackass.

Go on. Make a case for it, using events in my life.


And how long has this been going on for? Who's behind it?

The general decline of intelligence and morality is. It's a spontaneous process. No big oak table conspiracy.

In the US it started in 1920, when women got the right to vote. This would mean that the government would, with time, grow enough for them to no longer need providers and turn to seducers, who are always scum. Of course, this didn't happen in a blink of an eye.

American women behaved until the 60s, when we got our first slut generation.

Also, Dmitry72, the stupidity of your assertions and the vastness of your ignorance is stunning.

You claim I don't have empathy for some dumb baby born by rape to a crack addict who women adore. And you're correct, I don't, because that baby is human feces.

But you don't have empathy for the most perfect kind of human being, a male who can't use seduction. These males were always the driving force behind humanity, while seducers were mocked, hated and often executed.

Seduction is much, much worse than rape, since it creates a feeling of comfort in women and is more socially acceptable. Today it is the single greatest threat to humanity.

To blame men for not using seduction properly is the same as to blame them for not robbing or killing properly. It is the most insane thing in the world.

So, let me get this straight - males who were always the driving force behind advancement not being able to use the most vile thing in the world? Bad.

Retarded human feces created by horrible scum that shouldn't even exist? Good and we should feel sorry for it.

Amazing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back