Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

But if there are no victims, then how will victim advocates make a living?!



Case in point.
How is there ambiguity here? If a dude is shot at point blank range by a woman with a pocket pistol and dies with his dick out, the police have a pretty open an shut case of self-defense. There is no better antidote to rape than teaching every woman how to shoot a pistol, saying “teach men not to rape” is literally ignoring the problem and not teaching women how to defend themselves is consequentially making rape easier for rapists.
 
How is there ambiguity here? If a dude is shot at point blank range by a woman with a pocket pistol and dies with his dick out, the police have a pretty open an shut case of self-defense. There is no better antidote to rape than teaching every woman how to shoot a pistol, saying “teach men not to rape” is literally ignoring the problem and not teaching women how to defend themselves is consequentially making rape easier for rapists.

Personally, I think the key thing there is that she says courts blame rape victims. IOW, "Don't bother seeking justice; they'll just make you even more of a victim." So, don't bother defending yourself, and don't go to the courts; just lie back, pee on yourself, and quietly accept that all men are evil. She wants women to feel powerless and hopeless and totally dependent on the benevolence of men.

Modern feminism is easily one of the most misogynist philosophies I've ever encountered, I swear.
 
Personally, I think the key thing there is that she says courts blame rape victims. IOW, "Don't bother seeking justice; they'll just make you even more of a victim." So, don't bother defending yourself, and don't go to the courts; just lie back, pee on yourself, and quietly accept that all men are evil. She wants women to feel powerless and hopeless and totally dependent on the benevolence of men.

Modern feminism is easily one of the most misogynist philosophies I've ever encountered, I swear.
If women actually defend themselves successfully, that means cunts like Valenti are out of a job and that feminism doesn't really do anything for women.
 
Personally, I think the key thing there is that she says courts blame rape victims. IOW, "Don't bother seeking justice; they'll just make you even more of a victim." So, don't bother defending yourself, and don't go to the courts; just lie back, pee on yourself, and quietly accept that all men are evil. She wants women to feel powerless and hopeless and totally dependent on the benevolence of men.

Modern feminism is easily one of the most misogynist philosophies I've ever encountered, I swear.
And be sure to throw fistfuls of money at feminists for the pleasure of teaching you how to utterly subjugate yourself.
 
So, the battle is not over yet:


691549
 

691563
:story: He’s talking about cutting Medicaid and Medicare the ABSOLUTE MADMAN.
If I ascribe a 5.57D chess to this proposition I think he’s proposing that to get outrage addicts to glaze right over how he’s asking for the original wall amount on top of the emergency declaration amount. Just a thought.
 
:story: He’s talking about cutting Medicaid and Medicare the ABSOLUTE MADMAN.
If I ascribe a 5.57D chess to this proposition I think he’s proposing that to get outrage addicts to glaze right over how he’s asking for the original wall amount on top of the emergency declaration amount. Just a thought.

"Fine you can keep Medicaid and Medicare, but the rest goes!"
 

I love her arrant insistence the wall is a "symbol of discrimination"

That's horseshit. Legal immigrants can pass through the gates in the wall just fine, it's just to prevent the not legal ones from getting in.

She's basically saying she wants illegals in the country, to hell with the law on that.

My response to that is: She can cease being in Congress if she wants to argue against the laws her work should be bolstering, not defying.
 
I love her arrant insistence the wall is a "symbol of discrimination"

That's horseshit. Legal immigrants can pass through the gates in the wall just fine, it's just to prevent the not legal ones from getting in.

She's basically saying she wants illegals in the country, to hell with the law on that.

My response to that is: She can cease being in Congress if she wants to argue against the laws her work should be bolstering, not defying.

Then why even put up any kind of barrier at all? Trump wanted an expensive concrete monstrosity and was willing to steal private property to get it done. They are just going to continue with the barriers that they started with.
 
I love her arrant insistence the wall is a "symbol of discrimination"

That's horseshit. Legal immigrants can pass through the gates in the wall just fine, it's just to prevent the not legal ones from getting in.

She's basically saying she wants illegals in the country, to hell with the law on that.

My response to that is: She can cease being in Congress if she wants to argue against the laws her work should be bolstering, not defying.

Orderly lines of people waiting to be served by the cashier are discrimination.... the people who REALLY need their stuff should get to cut to the front of the line... no, they should get it for free and walk out with as much as they like and avoid the line AND playing! They deserve it because..... reasons......
 
Orderly lines of people waiting to be served by the cashier are discrimination.... the people who REALLY need their stuff should get to cut to the front of the line... no, they should get it for free and walk out with as much as they like and avoid the line AND playing! They deserve it because..... reasons......

Are you all aware that the reason Texas hasn't had the barriers put up is because landowners on the Rio Grande need the water access?
 
Because it's so hard to build something that allows water to flow through it.

Well, it's those lawsuits that held up the barriers back in 2006. So it's not really about wanting illegals as it is trying to mitigate the water access to those cattle ranches and quite frankly, a concrete monstrosity wouldn't allow for water access. I think water diversion needs to be apart of the comprehensive building plans. And wanting to steal this land from people for selfish needs is inapprehensible.
 
Well, it's those lawsuits that held up the barriers back in 2006. So it's not really about wanting illegals as it is trying to mitigate the water access to those cattle ranches and quite frankly, a concrete monstrosity wouldn't allow for water access. I think water diversion needs to be apart of the comprehensive building plans. And wanting to steal this land from people for selfish needs is inapprehensible.
The oh so selfish purpose of securing the border. Boomer lolbertarian argument in 3,2,1....
 
The oh so selfish purpose of securing the border. Boomer lolbertarian argument in 3,2,1....


Not to burst your Trumpian rant bubble, but the illegals don't cross down where the ranches are. Cause the landowners would shoot to kill.
 

Not to burst your Trumpian rant bubble, but the illegals don't cross down where the ranches are. Cause the landowners would shoot to kill.

If illegals don't cross there, why are people showing up to shoot them?
 
Back