- Joined
- Sep 1, 2016
While the subject matter is asinine, I will give big points as their rhyme and meter are quite on point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While the subject matter is asinine, I will give big points as their rhyme and meter are quite on point.
I will agree that Catcher in the Rye is pretty low tier but Vonnegut is halirous. Also something tells me this person never read Lolita or any other Nabokov novel for that matter.So in conclusion this person probably doesn't actually care about reading and the few books they read are too seem woke and smart. Basically just what Nabokov would call a philistine.Like Lolita was never intended to be a legit romance novel. The beginning is supposed to mimic extreme pseudo art of people like Sade while the second half is Humbert's true uncaring and abusive personality shows through his cliche romantic allusions and faux intellectual mask. Humbert's lust is never shown as true love as he constantly talks about how plain and awful Dolores's (Lolita's real name) personality is and how he only cares about her sexually. It's quite telling most people never finish the book past the second half when it really drops any illusions it would ever be a romance or pornographic book.
“Your such an egg sweatie. Gay men are so racist and problematic. Men are the worst. Toxic. Bi people have institutionalized heteronormativity ”
I’m not familiar with the show, but was the racial segregation a result of being super-woke or was it some kind of weird hypocritical misconduct in the same vein of being a sex pest?
At the request of Shaw’s rep, Tahir Jetter — who is black and a college friend of Shaw’s husband, Zach Strauss, but has no writing credit on the show — sent THR an email stating, “I was employed on SMILF for a short while [three weeks] and I found everyone to be largely affable and of good humor. When I was hired, it happened that I shared an office with two other black writers (a female writing duo), but I didn't think anything of it, as it seemed that all of the other available desks/offices had been taken by the time that I had come onboard.”
"These conditions are non negotiable."
I will agree that Catcher in the Rye is pretty low tier but Vonnegut is halirous. Also something tells me this person never read Lolita or any other Nabokov novel for that matter.undefined
She's not nominated, she's just eligible to go on the shortlist. So there's no chance she's going to be up for the award.
That feels like projection to me. And it's telling he's using a Drag Race gif to illustrate his point. But I'd recommend to the gays - don't throw the rest of the alphabet under the bus, but definitely whatever part of the alphabet this asshole thinks they're in. Or even just this Chloe specifically.
Also, for troons, transtrenders and other genderspecials, that's not an unpopular opinion at all. It's just they accuse everyone of ignoring them and treating them like shit, so the alleged extra betrayal when it comes from the LGBs is only so they can act extra hurt. The gay these people have been lumped with for decades and have been shitting on for about as long might not want to be on your side? Shocker.
Difference between these two is that Person B is actually still alive, unlike American slaves.Why do I find the most cursed SJW shit?
View attachment 692507
In a way, it's kinda admitting "we all look the same and are interchangeable."Difference between these two is that Person B is actually still alive, unlike American slaves.
Also, how do you prove who's descended from who? I'm sure fits of massive proportion would be thrown if a black guy found to have slave-owning ancestors has to pay to a white guy who has slave ancestors. There are surely many other people who have ancestors from both categories, so I guess they just give money to themselves.
I'm glad you understand this.The emphasis seems to have shifted at some point from society frowning at minorities or individuals being the specific butt of a joke to any joke about a minority at all being off limits. It’s fundamentalist thinking and it misses the whole point of what PC was supposed to be about. It was supposed to stop people casually denigrating individuals or races/groups. But when you crack that mother in law joke, it’s a universally recognised trope even if you couch it in terms of a specific ethnicity. It’s funny because it speaks to a universal experience that transcends cultures. To read it as a dig against the minority you used in the joke is to misunderstand it completely.
That will be the real fate for any of these poor souls.America is so bizzare these days. Recently I got into a conversation with someone about how the statue of liberty will be black on some coin soon(?) and I would up asking if lady liberty could also be a man. They said no, that's awful, that's degrading, no way the statue of liberty could be a man... because men are oppressive? It speaks so much to their ulterior opinions. They say shit like "kill all men" are jokes, but on some level they truly believe that men are subhuman and to be compared to one is an insult.
It'll be funny to watch in 10 years when they're 30-38 and "can't find a good man" to settle down with.
And this is why it kinda annoys me that people don't really get it.In a way, it's kinda admitting "we all look the same and are interchangeable."
Dunno if its been mentioned yet but some deep and dark shit seems to be going down regarding the Johnny Depp/Amber Heard abuse scandal in the twitter jungleland
Apparently a bunch of friends witnesses have testified on oath that there was serious and violent abuse going on.....inflicted entirely by Amber Heard upon Depp, to which Heard confessed in court, including a nearly successful attempt to cut off his finger, which seems to have a good bit of photographic evidence from depp's public appearences
Not exactly a strictly SJW subject I know, but given the REEEEEEE campaign led to his career detonating overnight and the fact no decent article has emerged yet for me to post in happenings im dumping this here
SJWs are actually incredibly conservative about gender roles. Butch lesbians are trans men, drag queens are trans women, and if your little boy likes dressup or your little girl likes sports they're trans. If you're an awkward boy who doesn't drown in pussy like Chad or not like other girls in the vein of the models you see on Instagram you must be actually trans, too.Or that the "transman" she was playing was more than likely just a butch lesbian.
I’d say unemployed. She’ll get the niche photoshoots for being “brave” and then disappear entirely.https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/model-starts-beauty-revolution-by-refusing-to-conform
OK, so, would this woman be a hero for refusing to conform, or a vicious vile beast for being a model, a job that revolves around physical beauty?
I’d say unemployed. She’ll get the niche photoshoots for being “brave” and then disappear entirely.
It wouldn’t be nearly so bad if she didn’t have such a terrible bleach job on her hair. And the eyebrow can’t really block the whole butterface thing either.