Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Is anyone aware of which businesses CNN are in a contract with to constantly play their station in their buildings? I'm curious to hammer some rough math out to try and figure out how many of those views can be automatically deducted, but I can't recall which 'businesses' they have an agreement with besides bus stations and airports.
AT&T owns WarnerMedia (CNN’s parent company) now. They’re going through restructuring of all of WarnerMedia’s units and Jeff Zucker will be oversighting all their sports networks. I would imagine CNN is going to have layoffs soon.

Or, if AT&T gets irritated with CNN’s inconsistent ability to make ratings, we could see a split from them or sale.

Regardless, AT&T has a lot to do with CNN.
 
3d004e8d189ae9b1dfb4e2b8bb4a9a5e.png


Dude were you even fucking here for the Obama Administration? That shit was like a bi-monthly fucking occurence.

Pulse Night Club
San Bernadino
Fort Hood
Benghazi
Charlie Hebdo
Nice France

"Religion of Peace. Religion of Peace. Religion of Peace. Lone Wolf attack." Seriously every single time this happened we were just told it's some small, fringe element that doesn't even matter, or it's just a "lone wolf" so who cares. God I hate people who think they can just pull this memory-hole shit as if people can't even remember what happened past last week.
 
Last edited:
Is anyone aware of which businesses CNN are in a contract with to constantly play their station in their buildings? I'm curious to hammer some rough math out to try and figure out how many of those views can be automatically deducted, but I can't recall which 'businesses' they have an agreement with besides bus stations and airports.

Airports are the biggest ones, I think.
 
Is anyone aware of which businesses CNN are in a contract with to constantly play their station in their buildings? I'm curious to hammer some rough math out to try and figure out how many of those views can be automatically deducted, but I can't recall which 'businesses' they have an agreement with besides bus stations and airports.

I think McDonald's has a contract with them or something. Seems like every time I walk into one anywhere, CNN's on the TV. Think the same goes for Wendy's, but it could just be isolated restaurants for all I know.
 
3d004e8d189ae9b1dfb4e2b8bb4a9a5e.png


Dude were you even fucking here for the Obama Administration? That shit was like a bi-monthly fucking occurence.

Pulse Night Club
San Bernadino
Fort Hood
Benghazi
Charlie Hebdo
Nice France

"Religion of Peace. Religion of Peace. Religion of Peace. Lone Wolf attack." Seriously every single time this happened we were just told it's some small, fringe element that doesn't even matter, or it's just a "lone wolf" so who cares. God I hate people who think they can just pull this memory-hole shit as if people can't even remember what happened past last week.
Why would they even ask Drumpf considering their assumption is he's a white nationalist to begin with?
 
Is anyone actually surprised that they would blame Trump for the New Zealand massacre? They blamed bad weather on Trump ffs.
Not particularly, especially since a certain forum is screeching for PDP's blood over the massacre.

Some people just can't help themselves when it comes to scapegoating those that had nothing to do with tragedies.
 
Terrorists are a bunch of cells!

My Jihad! My Choice!
This is one thing I’ve never understood about liberals. They’ll try and make comparisons and with that, demand the exact reaction. The problem with that is, in this case, we don’t know enough about the attackers yet. A terrorist attack has to specifically be part of a larger operation like ISIS. As far as we know, the four people involved could just have been representing only themselves and not affiliated with a larger group or movement. That doesn’t mean the attack was any less violent, but this doesn’t mean it was necessarily a terrorist attack.
 
3d004e8d189ae9b1dfb4e2b8bb4a9a5e.png


Dude were you even fucking here for the Obama Administration? That shit was like a bi-monthly fucking occurence.

Pulse Night Club
San Bernadino
Fort Hood
Benghazi
Charlie Hebdo
Nice France

"Religion of Peace. Religion of Peace. Religion of Peace. Lone Wolf attack." Seriously every single time this happened we were just told it's some small, fringe element that doesn't even matter, or it's just a "lone wolf" so who cares. God I hate people who think they can just pull this memory-hole shit as if people can't even remember what happened past last week.

Technically, the guys behind those attacks were lone wolfs. Doesn't really matter if Muslim related stuff or white supremacy, usually these guys are lone wolf nutjobs.
 
A terrorist attack has to specifically be part of a larger operation like ISIS. As far as we know, the four people involved could just have been representing only themselves and not affiliated with a larger group or movement. That doesn’t mean the attack was any less violent, but this doesn’t mean it was necessarily a terrorist attack.

How many members does a terrorist group make?
 
How many members does a terrorist group make?
It isn’t really about the amount of people that commit the act at a given time, but it’s about whether they’re associated with a larger group. Sometimes, terrorist acts are more effective carried out by a single person on a large scale, like the car attacks in Europe. If someone is trying to murder, rob, beat or torture people in the name of a movement or a group, it is a terrorist attack because they represent something bigger than themselves (with possible repeats of the same methods used by other members of the organization, creating a pattern)
 
It isn’t really about the amount of people that commit the act at a given time, but it’s about whether they’re associated with a larger group. ..

Acting in concert seems to be a group. I'm struggling to understand your definitions.

it is a terrorist attack because they represent something bigger than themselves

This borders on tautology.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Kinkshamer
Acting in concert seems to be a group. I'm struggling to understand your definitions.



This borders on tautology.
Terrorist attack- acting on behalf of a group or organization using violence
Examples: Jihadists, ISIS, ALF

Lone wolf- committing violence on behalf of personal interest
Examples: Columbine, Sandy Hook, MSD
 
The SJW spergs annoy me with this shit just as much as the Fox News motherfuckers trying to bank off of the same civil unrest and provocation with sensationalist garbage.

For every case of how there are stories of "increased racism" on Facebook, many times evidence elsewhere has debunked it as false.

All I'm hoping is for an American Civil War esque demonstration where both crowds just gather in DC, have at it, and kill each other before a live audience as national bloodsport. Then as the last few remain, someone takes an Apache to blow them the fuck up while we get back to our normal lives.

All this has demonstrated to me how freely spewing politics unveils how powerlust and exceptionalism leads to stupidity by thinking "if we did things this way we would never be wrong".

Politics. Not even once.
 
Terrorist attack- acting on behalf of a group or organization using violence
Examples: Jihadists, ISIS, ALF

Lone wolf- committing violence on behalf of personal interest
Examples: Columbine, Sandy Hook, MSD
terrorism (tĕrˈə-rĭzˌəm)




  • n.

    The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person -OR- an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.

Anyone can commit an act of terrorism, and therefor be a terrorist. It's a classification based on motives, not organization.
 
terrorism (tĕrˈə-rĭzˌəm)




  • n.

    The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person -OR- an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
Anyone can commit an act of terrorism, and therefor be a terrorist. It's a classification based on motives, not organization.
That definition isn’t helpful when trying to narrow down the motive, which is why I separated the two words. If we apply it to too many things, the original meaning becomes muddled and ceases to be useful.
 
Technically, the guys behind those attacks were lone wolfs. Doesn't really matter if Muslim related stuff or white supremacy, usually these guys are lone wolf nutjobs.

Pulse and Nice have been attributed to ISIL, Benghazi to the militant group Ansar al-Sharia (though the attack was perpetrated by "a small and savage group" according to Hillary), and Charlie Hebdo to al-Qaeda.

San Bernadino (a couple which ISIL apparently later referred to as "supporters" and "soldiers of the caliphate," aka members of ISIL) and Fort Hood ("Soldier of Allah") were in the name of the death cult if not directly attached to or immersed within a militant group.

I really don't think "lone wolf nutjob" is a wholly fair or accurate assessment for these attacks, at least not for the first four or maybe five described above. Same would go for a white supremacist acting in the name of an organized supremacist group, but that's not common since...wait for it...there really aren't that many white supremacists in the world, and the groups that do exist here and there are simply not powerful in numbers, influential in core messaging, or funded, regardless of what the media narrative after Charlottesville would have everyone believe.
 
Back