Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?

  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Holden said:
Ok, let me put it this way. Would you marry a man you have never ever seen simply based on how much he could provide, but without him being considered rich? If not, you already have a problem.
Click to expand...

First off, I'm male, so I won't be able to describe what I do exactly.

Second, I have trouble understanding that statement, but I'll give it a shot.

-Most women do not marry off first sight. first I would research about the male. is he a good person? can he take care of me? will we be happy?
-If he can provide, yes. if no, I will help. that's what Family values are all about. helping loved ones in time of need.
-If the feeling is mutual, the relation will eventually scale to marriage and will last until one of the partners die.

Now, I think you implied that only women fall in love with men because they're rich, powerful and handsome.
But remember that men also fall in love to quickly over women with superficial things like beauty and large body proportions that give off signs of motherhood.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Saney, Shokew and Dalish
Cephalometrist said:
Since you are the intellectual here:

1. Apparently, we (i.e. probably the majority of the West) live in a femifascist dictatorship. A long (?) time ago, that hasn't been the case. When did it all go wrong and why? What were the good, old days?

2. How do governments increase their tax revenue by feminist policies? Which ones are especially profitable when compared to more orthodox means of taxation?

3. How did the Liberals even manage to assume power? And how are they able to maintain that position? I mean, after all, they are incapable of complex plans.

And could you please continue your lecture on the nature of heterosexual couples and their brutal relationships?
I asked you a few pages ago, but you just dismissed my summary of your theory as strawmen and didn't care to explain any further.

Edit:
Sorry, I didn't notice your short post about the heterosexuality, this thread is just so fast.



But the vast majority of children are results of rape, aren't they?



Does that include all females or just females in the West or in Croatia? And also, what is the cause for this? What happened?
Click to expand...
1. No society can survive women's suffrage. Ancient Rome would probably instituted women's suffrage in its decline had it remained a democracy. So you could start counting them. US was doomed by 1920. Also, this is no feminist dictatorship. It's just government doing what it can to get female votes.
2. By enabling women in all parts of the workforce. How many women are housewives today?
3. Liberalism appears in all decadent cultures. Ancient Greeks were liberals and their last philosphers before fall to the Rome even claimed that men and women should dress the same. These developments signified the end of Ancient Greece.
Today's party politics is a hoax. It's all really liberalism. Nobody questions things like women's suffrage. Dems-Reps, conservatives or social democrats, all the same.


Vast majority of children today are a result of seduction. This results in their atrocious quality. I don't know how many of your fathers were a result of seduction and how many of providers but your grandfathers were still a result of providers and thus sane.

As intelligence decreases so will the standards of mating. In about 15-20 years most chidren will be products of rape.

Croatia and West are the same in this regard. Croatia isn't completely Westernized in everything but it is completely feminist.
 
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
  • Disagree
Reactions: puzzlemasterPandora, deductionotaku, Saney and 11 others
Oglooger said:
Now, I think you implied that only women fall in love with men because they're rich, powerful and handsome.
Click to expand...

I think he was actually saying that women should marry any man who can provide for them, sight unseen, and they're breaking society into pieces if they object to that idea. Because... reasons. He doesn't want to flirt, or something.
 
Holden said:
Vast majority of children today are a result of seduction. This results in their atrocious quality. I don't know how many of your fathers were a result of seduction and how many of providers but your grandfathers were still a result of providers and thus sane.
Click to expand...

>atrocious quality

I can see your point, sort of. We discuss these atrocious quality children quite often in these forums, believe it or not.
 
Holden said:
1. No society can survive women's suffrage. Ancient Rome would probably instituted women's suffrage in its decline had it remained a democracy. So you could start counting them. US was doomed by 1920. Also, this is no feminist dictatorship. It's just government doing what it can to get female votes.
2. By enabling women in all parts of the workforce. How many women are housewives today?
3. Liberalism appears in all decadent cultures. Ancient Greeks were liberals and their last philosphers before fall to the Rome even claimed that men and women should dress the same. These developments signified the end of Ancient Greece.
Today's party politics is a hoax. It's all really liberalism. Nobody questions things like women's suffrage. Dems-Reps, conservatives or social democrats, all the same.


Vast majority of children today are a result of seduction. This results in their atrocious quality. I don't know how many of your fathers were a result of seduction and how many of providers but your grandfathers were still a result of providers and thus sane.

As intelligence decreases so will the standards of mating. In about 15-20 years most chidren will be products of rape.

Croatia and West are the same in this regard. Croatia isn't completely Westernized in everything but it is completely feminist.
Click to expand...

Bruh, do you history?

The Fall of the Western Roman Empire had nothing to do with suffrage and everything to do with simple economics and outside threats. The Roman Empire was massive and had already broken apart into the East and West-- the West was closet to the Arabs and Moors and Berbers and had less military strength than the East. The Eastern Roman Empire lasted for centuries after the fall of the West, which wasn't 'ancient' times, but late antiquity.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Saney, Ti-99/4A, Randall Fragg and 3 others
Holden said:
1. No society can survive women's suffrage. Ancient Rome would probably instituted women's suffrage in its decline had it remained a democracy. So you could start counting them. US was doomed by 1920. Also, this is no feminist dictatorship. It's just government doing what it can to get female votes.
2. By enabling women in all parts of the workforce. How many women are housewives today?
3. Liberalism appears in all decadent cultures. Ancient Greeks were liberals and their last philosphers before fall to the Rome even claimed that men and women should dress the same. These developments signified the end of Ancient Greece.
Today's party politics is a hoax. It's all really liberalism. Nobody questions things like women's suffrage. Dems-Reps, conservatives or social democrats, all the same.


Vast majority of children today are a result of seduction. This results in their atrocious quality. I don't know how many of your fathers were a result of seduction and how many of providers but your grandfathers were still a result of providers and thus sane.

As intelligence decreases so will the standards of mating. In about 15-20 years most chidren will be products of rape.

Croatia and West are the same in this regard. Croatia isn't completely Westernized in everything but it is completely feminist.
Click to expand...

-No Society will survive, period. Civilizations are born and decay. while others bloom.

- While the workforce has gone liberal, there are still more housewives than women in the workforce. I hate to use blogs as a refrence, but in America, only 29% of women are in the workforce http://washparkprophet.blogspot.com/2009/05/how-many-american-women-are-homemakers.html

-While I sort of agree with this. it's just a sign that the time for western civilization might come to an end, but what can you do about it? ever heard of greek tragedies? all we can do is live life and maintain traditional values.
-Can't argue with that last statment. politics are always a joke.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Shokew
Miraak said:
Bruh, do you history?

The Fall of the Western Roman Empire had nothing to do with suffrage and everything to do with simple economics and outside threats. The Roman Empire was massive and had already broken apart into the East and West-- the West was closet to the Arabs and Moors and Berbers and had less military strength than the East. The Eastern Roman Empire lasted for centuries after the fall of the West, which wasn't 'ancient' times, but late antiquity.
Click to expand...
You don't know anything about history. Had Rome remained sane there was no way for it to be conquered. But the state lost its way a long time ago, around 1st century AD. It lived on its great expansion for a few more centuries but was done by 1st century AD. The loosening of norms that handled women was just an example of that. As Rome continued to decline women were getting more and more "rights". By end of Western Empire they were basically the same as men.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: puzzlemasterPandora, deductionotaku, Saney and 8 others
Oglooger said:
-No Society will survive, period. Civilizations are born and decay. while others bloom.

- While the workforce has gone liberal, there are still more housewives than women in the workforce. I hate to use blogs as a refrence, but in America, only 29% of women are in the workforce http://washparkprophet.blogspot.com/2009/05/how-many-american-women-are-homemakers.html

-While I sort of agree with this. it's just a sign that the time for western civilization might come to an end, but what can you do about it? ever heard of greek tragedies? all we can do is live life and maintain traditional values.
-Can't argue with that last statment. politics are always a joke.
Click to expand...
- Yes, but it's important to know why. The reasons are always the same. Read Unwin's Sex and Culture
-it says that 29 percent ARE NOT in the workforce. This doesn't mean that all who aren't are housewives either.
- I am arguing for traditional values and look how I am treated.
- Good !
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: puzzlemasterPandora, deductionotaku, Saney and 5 others
Holden said:
- Yes, but it's important to know why. The reasons are always the same. Read Unwin's Sex and Culture
-it says that 29 percent ARE NOT in the workforce. This doesn't mean that all who aren't are housewives either.
- I am arguing for traditional values and look how I am treated.
- Good !
Click to expand...

Appealing to tradition is fallacious.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Saney and Randall Fragg
Miraak said:
It's a common misconception that women traditionally married for providership in antiquity. I hate to break it to you, Holdek, but women have been marrying for the man rather than the provider for centuries.
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? A marriage between nobles was seen as a contract, even closer to international/intercommunal than a business one, up to mid 19th century.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: deductionotaku, Saney, Ti-99/4A and 5 others
Holden said:
- Yes, but it's important to know why. The reasons are always the same. Read Unwin's Sex and Culture
-it says that 29 percent ARE NOT in the workforce. This doesn't mean that all who aren't are housewives either.
- I am arguing for traditional values and look how I am treated.
- Good !
Click to expand...
Do you follow any kind of religion, or believe in any god? What about holy books?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back