We all know of the logic of politicians using increased immigration, and then also downplaying and hidign the numbers, as it's the easy economic expediency option, to maintain demand and economic activity for 3 to 4 years of their term, but the fact remains that
immigration of muslims is incredibly unpopular - especially African or ME muslims, and especially since the war in the Balkans, for ~25 years up to 2019.
And yet, with few exceptions, Western governments always insist on inciting, disenfranchising and effectively betraying existing populations in all of our countries, and have continually increased the hatred level for all politicians, and distrust of all western governments, and the constitutional authorities, and continually fanned reactionary and incendiary attitudes and rhetoric via always pushing fro very high muslim immigration.
All of our
politicians just keep doing it, and they keep on pretending that the local citizens who made such a terrible mistake of ever electing any existing western politician, or political party to government, are the real problem. But not the policies and the constant lies and continual sly actions to always seek to increase the number of muslim migrants regardless, even when it's so obviously shattering the fabric and peace of the society, greatly weakening it, and filling it with hatred, anger and unlimited levels of distrust for the Western governments that keep on doing this damage to our countries - increasingly turning them into unsafe muslim colonized 'shit-holes'.
But always it our own elected lawyer-politicians from established parties who did the real damage, then blame the citizens for not liking the result, or them.
You want to provide some thoughts about why you think they keep amping
muslim immigration, with respect to you other remarks?
Frankly, I think we should all be asking rather bluntly why we aren't just banning Islam in all western countries at this point? I'm very familiar with UN Human Rights code and the UN version of why those matter so much, but frankly it's been a failure applied to Islam as muslims are not the slightest bit interested in the UN's version of reality, nor the ideal of equality of all, or freedom of religion, nor tolerance of all. It's a flop, a bust, we have been living a delusion in thinking human rights thinking would apply to hard-line Islamic fundamentalism. It obviously doesn't, they clearly don't accept it, Islamic thought and scripture is fundamentally incompatible with the UN Human Rights agenda, or even with shared Western 'values'.
Did Muhammad in text call on death to all non believers?
The truth please teach us.No spin just the facts Thanks in advance
answers.yahoo.com
It's not like the evidence is not in already, but do
our politicians ever stop amping up muslim immigration to our 'unbeliever' countries?
So why should we not ban muslims at this stage from our countries entirely, with equal but opposite prejudice, and intolerance for all muslims, not just the overtly nasty ones, given their 'religion' is that prejudiced about all of us, from the get go?
Why is this question not asked in Parliament Question Time, in Canberra or London, given it's a perfectly valid question to be asking?
Because our politicians are far more comfortable with the ease of constantly betraying and weakening us with sly muslim immigration increases instead?
This is what's under-laying the actions of walking into a mosque with a shotgun, to blow away people you never even met, the politicians and political parties produced both the muslim problem, and the guy with the shotgun.
But it seems pretty clear to me the real problem behind it all is the
career politicians and their parties which keep getting elected and tisk-tisking,
and no one else.
Until all of those politicans are gone, the muslims will just keep coming in bigger and bigger numbers, and they will not be turfed out and the police will keep assisting the politicians to screw us.
