Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?

  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Holden said:
Yes. I mind the picture for two reasons 1. It wants to show me as some "creep", though the guy is pretty handsome 2. The red thing is annoying and childish.

I want to put a pic of a rape whore Jesslyn Nicole.
Click to expand...

You are an adorable lil chubby bunny woogums and no one will ever ever change your picture!
 
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Randall Fragg, Ti-99/4A, The Knife's Husbando and 2 others

How are you laughing at them though? If you sired a child and he became successful, well-loved, and a generally awesome person in some way, maybe then you can laugh.

But you want to breed for the sake of breeding, with a schizophrenic woman who you seem to think can't even properly care for the kid. Who's really laughing, when that's the best spawn you could create? He'll end up on a forum just like this one, and it will be the people you hate who are laughing.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Overcast, Randall Fragg and Pinhead
You know, I'm starting to suspect that my boyfriend may have a personality disorder.
Antisocial Personality Disorder Criteria:
DSM IV - TR
(cautionary statement)

A. There is a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others occurring since age 15 years, as indicated by three (or more) of the following:

(1) failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
(2) deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
(3) impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
(4) irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
(5) reckless disregard for safety of self or others
(6) consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent work behavior or honor financial obligations
(7) lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another

B. The individual is at least age 18 years.

C. There is evidence of Conduct Disorder with onset before age 15 years.

D. The occurrence of antisocial behavior is not exclusively during the course ofSchizophrenia or a Manic Episode.
Click to expand...
Although it could be another personality disorder, or something different altogether.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Meowthkip, NobleGreyHorse and Cuck Norris
Holden said:
Well, thank you for your civility but I am annoyed with you.

I gave you a huge article on why women turned to scumbags. You have no time. Ok. But I also explained it many time here - they did so when they no longer needed providers.
Yes, there were men who seduced women in every historical period. But since most societies were patriarchies these men would be killed, and rightly so.

I explained that nobody espoused these viewpoints but that this is what feminism leads to.

I can move to Saudi Arabia for various reasons. I am not a Muslim, don't have an education in oil business etc.

As for rape, you really need to read the article. You can hate rape all you want but your ideas support it.

As for studies and citations you do know this is a scientifically grey area? That none of us can really support our claims as in chemistry or math?

But check http://www.coalpha.org/file/n5125898/db18_Fig_6.png

As for the Victorian age, it had lower illegitmacy rates than modern Britain.
Click to expand...

I did read the article you linked me to - in spite of the fact I really should have been reading about Australopithecus afarensis rather than the modern neanderthal - but even though this is a very entertaining and interesting conversation I can't put aside my work to read your whole blog.

I disagree that in 'most' patriarchal societies men were put to death for merely seducing women. They could be killed for raping women (providing they were high born enough for anyone to give a damn), they could be killed for kidnapping women , but unless the woman was extremely valuable men weren't put to death merely for seducing them (assuming seducing always leads to sex). Can you give some examples of men being put to death for seducing women who weren't married or high born? I can't remember studying any societies that did. When men were punished for crimes against a high born or married lady it was because they had devalued her for a man (ie her husband or father). Maybe in biblical times? I'm not sure.

Women were basically worthless in those societies. A lucky few had worth because of the status of their male relatives, but most were worth nothing. Women would be raped and unless she was important in some way nobody would care. In a lot of societies, when a woman was 'seduced' SHE was the one who was punished. See, again, Victorian England.

When the law was changed in a desperate attempt to lower the number of illegitimate births, please note that they absolved the men of responsibility and put all the shame and blame on the mothers. The law was changed so the father didn't have to contribute to the child, so he could save face. Women were jailed and beaten for 'seducing' men, but men were rarely ever punished because it was her fault because women are wicked.

If you're going to go through history and try and say men had it worse than women... well... then there's really nothing I can discuss with you because as you said yourself, almost all societies were patriarchal, meaning men were in charge and the laws favored men.


And of course the percentage of illegitimate children is higher in modern Britain. Children survive birth (stillborn infants or infants who didn't live long weren't counted in the consensus) over 95% of the time now (according to wikipedia, the morality rate is 4.5% in the UK). Victoria was extremely strict about religion and it was illegal to have premarital sex. That's not a crime in modern times and Britain isn't ruled by the church. I'm also not certain if the statistics floating around are just for England itself or for the whole of Britain.

I'm not saying I'm pro-illegitimacy or whatever, I'm just saying that it's only natural that the rates would be higher in a society where infant mortality is low and there isn't massive social stigma surrounding the issue. You still didn't explain why it happened in a patriarchal society, though.


As someone who is close to completing a bachelor of science with honors, yes, I do understand the nature of citations and scientific studies. There have been a lot of studies done in the area of relationships and attraction and I haven't seen one that proves women like rapists. There certainly ARE hard numbers out there about the percentage of illegitimate children in different countries, which is why I have repeatedly asked you to prove the statistic you gave (99%).

Also, as I suggested in my other post, why not do some scientific studies yourself? I'm sure there are scientists in the incel community who know how to run an unbiased experiment. You're a self-proclaimed intelligent guy, you have made this area of study your life, why not do some proper research so you can prove what you know to be true?

Please stop saying I'm supporting rape without knowing me. I don't blindly support feminists (in fact, if you were to see some of my posts on feminism here you'd know that I'm really disgusted with what passes for feminism) and I am getting into forensic science to help convict murderers and rapists. They're not empty words and you can't possibly know that. I've been respectful throughout these exchanges. I'm just asking you to refrain from saying that one thing.
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: puzzlemasterPandora, Meowthkip, Glaive and 4 others
cluelessly said:
How are you laughing at them though? If you sired a child and he became successful, well-loved, and a generally awesome person in some way, maybe then you can laugh.

But you want to breed for the sake of breeding, with a schizophrenic woman who you seem to think can't even properly care for the kid. Who's really laughing, when that's the best spawn you could create? He'll end up on a forum just like this one, and it will be the people you hate who are laughing.
Click to expand...
No. Trolls keeps saying I'm an incel because of nature/evolution etc. Well, now they'll be proven wrong.
They never mention anything about any other factors, like the fact that most incels are in STEM and well educated.

As for the kind, I can guarantee it won't life like I do. That woman is a very different person.
 
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
Reactions: Scratch This Nut, deductionotaku, NobleGreyHorse and 4 others
Holden said:
No. Trolls keeps saying I'm an incel because of nature/evolution etc. Well, now they'll be proven wrong.
They never mention anything about any other factors, like the fact that most incels are in STEM and well educated.

As for the kind, I can guarantee it won't life like I do. That woman is a very different person.
Click to expand...


Incel isn't real. Why do you think Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for it?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Coldgrip and Randall Fragg
Holden said:
Glaive - you do know these pictures are 6 years old and of someone else?
Click to expand...

I love the fact you know how old the photo is despite "not being you"

And even if it wasn't, it's the thought that counts right? You are getting fan art man! How cool is that? As long as people tie that face to your persona, it works.
So I will continue to use said photos to contribute fan works of the great Marjan to this thread until possible new ones are confirmed.

Cheers lad
 
  • Feels
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Scratch This Nut, Cuck Norris, Randall Fragg and 3 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back