Saint Regret
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2018
Looking at the pay piggie graph, we can conclude Caesar's palace had to cut it's praetorian guard in half.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That seems pretty out there as a possibility.Well the strange thing about that recent recording that Zoom did of his Bank Of America balance was that a large chunk of it was deposited all in one day.
Now I could imagine that somebody with good credit maybe could have taken a loan out for 261k for a home loan and just deposited the money then refunded it after they finished making the recording.
Well he is sitting at 197 patrons on patreon with the amount hidden. Guess it's embarrassing to show. No Telling. Even if they were all $10 patrons that's only $1,970 a month. Hardly enough to buy Marker's Mark nightly and support both himself and Andy Warski now. Also I recall when he switched phones because his number was doxed by Cow that he got a phone through Cricket or some other bargain bin phone carrier. You don't sign up for a carrier like that if you have money.Looking at the pay piggie graph, we can conclude Caesar's palace had to cut it's praetorian guard in half.
@Lord Akira was right. But Ralph has been poor his whole life and he's used to buying cheap, shitty stuff. He was making a lot of money when he was looking for a discount bag for his pretend e-wife.me thinks that Ralph might be having the real money problems right now.
@Lord Akira was right. But Ralph has been poor his whole life and he's used to buying cheap, shitty stuff. He was making a lot of money when he was looking for a discount bag for his pretend e-wife.
Link? And I'm referring to the fact that he sees her twice a year.Zoom called the marriage license place pretending to be Ralph.
Zoom said it on his stream last night, I don't remember the timestamp though.Link? And I'm referring to the fact that he sees her twice a year.
oof. Shouldn't have let zoom in ralf.
Assuming he's not completely full of shit that is. I'll believe it only if he shows DM's. Even then it's not a guarantee that the WSJ would run with a second article about IBS, unless she's going after YouTube for overlooking ban evasion for Alt-Right types, citing the Alex Jones case as to why they should be removed from the platform.oof. Shouldn't have let zoom in ralf.
If we add up using these metrics and how the shows have been going (roughly $75-100 USD once youtube gets their take), Ralph is currently looking at around $43-45K yearly income, and that's not even taking into account for taxes and the real possibility that the income stream will continue to dry up. Compared to the feast last year where he managed to snag around $120K with 55K left over in the bank at the end; this is looking like full-on famine if the decline continues.Well he is sitting at 197 patrons on patreon with the amount hidden. Guess it's embarrassing to show. No Telling. Even if they were all $10 patrons that's only $1,970 a month. Hardly enough to buy Marker's Mark nightly and support both himself and Andy Warski now. Also I recall when he switched phones because his number was doxed by Cow that he got a phone through Cricket or some other bargain bin phone carrier. You don't sign up for a carrier like that if you have money.
His new project 2 account is a joke. 9 supporters with a total of $67 a month![]()
![]()
me thinks that Ralph might be having the real money problems right now.
Assuming he's not completely full of shit that is. I'll believe it only if he shows DM's. Even then it's not a guarantee that the WSJ would run with a second article about IBS, unless she's going after YouTube for overlooking ban evasion for Alt-Right types, citing the Alex Jones case as to why they should be removed from the platform.
"HUR HUR YER MOM!" Jesus Ralph I get you were too stupid to do highschool but at least attempt to not act like a kid.
because they want ratingsOk, I know this isn't the thread for this and this has probably been said, but seriously wtf. Why is it right for the media to get to have played clips of the planes hitting the towers and if I'm not mistaken what happened in Las Vegas and that one incident in Russia and other horrific incidents but it's wrong for anyone except the media to have seen the above video? Why!
Assuming he's not completely full of shit that is. I'll believe it only if he shows DM's. Even then it's not a guarantee that the WSJ would run with a second article about IBS, unless she's going after YouTube for overlooking ban evasion for Alt-Right types, citing the Alex Jones case as to why they should be removed from the platform.
you already know the answer to that. (((privilege)))Ok, I know this isn't the thread for this and this has probably been said, but seriously wtf. Why is it right for the media to get to have played clips of the planes hitting the towers and if I'm not mistaken what happened in Las Vegas and that one incident in Russia and other horrific incidents but it's wrong for anyone except the media to have seen the above video? Why!