🐷 Ethan Oliver Ralph / TheRalphRetort / Rad Roberts / Jcaesar187 / Rage Pig / "Killstream" / "Tequila Sunrise" - 5'1'' fat alcoholic, owner of a gunt, convicted felon and revenge pornographer, property of the ugly failed tranny pornstar Lucas Roberts. Has quadruple titties.

Status
Not open for further replies.
701069
 
Well the strange thing about that recent recording that Zoom did of his Bank Of America balance was that a large chunk of it was deposited all in one day.
Now I could imagine that somebody with good credit maybe could have taken a loan out for 261k for a home loan and just deposited the money then refunded it after they finished making the recording.
That seems pretty out there as a possibility.

Another thing that Ralph might not have considered was that Zoom was bullshitting to Stream.me in order to grease the wheels of the deal he wanted to do. Maybe Zoom was trying to pull a sympathy ploy.

I'm wondering why Zoom has that much fucking money in his account though, he's never given me the impression that he has that much fucking disposable income. You did bring up a good point about it being his parent's account, thats absolutely possible as well.
 
Looking at the pay piggie graph, we can conclude Caesar's palace had to cut it's praetorian guard in half.
Well he is sitting at 197 patrons on patreon with the amount hidden. Guess it's embarrassing to show. No Telling. Even if they were all $10 patrons that's only $1,970 a month. Hardly enough to buy Marker's Mark nightly and support both himself and Andy Warski now. Also I recall when he switched phones because his number was doxed by Cow that he got a phone through Cricket or some other bargain bin phone carrier. You don't sign up for a carrier like that if you have money.
His new project 2 account is a joke. 9 supporters with a total of $67 a month

me thinks that Ralph might be having the real money problems right now.
 
@Lord Akira was right. But Ralph has been poor his whole life and he's used to buying cheap, shitty stuff. He was making a lot of money when he was looking for a discount bag for his pretend e-wife.

They're actually married. Zoom called the marriage license place pretending to be Ralph.
 
Congrats, Ralph. You’ve shown that Zoom, someone nobody in their right mind would trust for a second, has probably lied about donating the money to charity. What’s next? Exposing Andy doing coke?

We told you this shit 300 pages ago. You’re still the retard that cozied up to him in the first place.
 
oof. Shouldn't have let zoom in ralf.
Assuming he's not completely full of shit that is. I'll believe it only if he shows DM's. Even then it's not a guarantee that the WSJ would run with a second article about IBS, unless she's going after YouTube for overlooking ban evasion for Alt-Right types, citing the Alex Jones case as to why they should be removed from the platform.
 
Well he is sitting at 197 patrons on patreon with the amount hidden. Guess it's embarrassing to show. No Telling. Even if they were all $10 patrons that's only $1,970 a month. Hardly enough to buy Marker's Mark nightly and support both himself and Andy Warski now. Also I recall when he switched phones because his number was doxed by Cow that he got a phone through Cricket or some other bargain bin phone carrier. You don't sign up for a carrier like that if you have money.
His new project 2 account is a joke. 9 supporters with a total of $67 a month

me thinks that Ralph might be having the real money problems right now.
If we add up using these metrics and how the shows have been going (roughly $75-100 USD once youtube gets their take), Ralph is currently looking at around $43-45K yearly income, and that's not even taking into account for taxes and the real possibility that the income stream will continue to dry up. Compared to the feast last year where he managed to snag around $120K with 55K left over in the bank at the end; this is looking like full-on famine if the decline continues.
 
Assuming he's not completely full of shit that is. I'll believe it only if he shows DM's. Even then it's not a guarantee that the WSJ would run with a second article about IBS, unless she's going after YouTube for overlooking ban evasion for Alt-Right types, citing the Alex Jones case as to why they should be removed from the platform.

I can't remember the part of the stream he did the wife thing in. But if she were to write an article I would expect the article to be about how youtube allows a banned alt-right nazi who joked about the synagogue shooting on again to joke about the new zealand shooting and how this leads to the spread of this shit. What she is going on about right now:

701139
 
Ok, I know this isn't the thread for this and this has probably been said, but seriously wtf. Why is it right for the media to get to have played clips of the planes hitting the towers and if I'm not mistaken what happened in Las Vegas and that one incident in Russia and other horrific incidents but it's wrong for anyone except the media to have seen the above video? Why!
 
Ok, I know this isn't the thread for this and this has probably been said, but seriously wtf. Why is it right for the media to get to have played clips of the planes hitting the towers and if I'm not mistaken what happened in Las Vegas and that one incident in Russia and other horrific incidents but it's wrong for anyone except the media to have seen the above video? Why!
because they want ratings
Ratings = Money

It's always been that way. They want to be the only ones who have the footage because then the masses will go to them for it.
 
Assuming he's not completely full of shit that is. I'll believe it only if he shows DM's. Even then it's not a guarantee that the WSJ would run with a second article about IBS, unless she's going after YouTube for overlooking ban evasion for Alt-Right types, citing the Alex Jones case as to why they should be removed from the platform.

YouTube "harboring nazis" has actually become a left normie talking point, the blue checkmark brigade came down hard on YouTube for making a statement on the Kiwi shooting and not going after them.
 
Ok, I know this isn't the thread for this and this has probably been said, but seriously wtf. Why is it right for the media to get to have played clips of the planes hitting the towers and if I'm not mistaken what happened in Las Vegas and that one incident in Russia and other horrific incidents but it's wrong for anyone except the media to have seen the above video? Why!
you already know the answer to that. (((privilege)))
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back