Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
156 fucking pages in 2 days? Wow. Holden, this is for you:

Digging-Hole001.jpg
 
If they collapse, it's usually because a bunch of psychotic fucktards like you start lopping off heads and starting militias in response to it.
When has this happened?

The chances of ionizing radiation causing genetic mutations THAT specific are incredibly slim. Ionizing radiation damages the DNA present in cells, it doesn't give you superpowers.
I am just making a point, you fucking retard
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@Holden :

So, I skimmed a bit through fschmidt's essay and there really isn't much to it. There are female felons, so apparently social pressure isn't enough to keep them in line. On the other hand the vast majority of males are without any previous criminal record, so they seem to be quite decent, even without police officers watching them all the time.
Well, most people are without criminal records so I can hardly see your point.

@Holden :
Even if you assume that his precedent is correct, the consequence from it simply isn't necessary. If you aren't affected by certain laws or social convention, it simply doesn't exclude you from discussing them. This is why everybody can discuss taxation rates, child welfare, regulations concerning religious groups etc.
Not a correct analogy. You're missing the point that women aren't self aware and have no sense of fairness. If you gave them the vote they'll just want to protect themselves using the govt.

@Holden :The fundamental point he and you are missing is that you fail to argue why females (or "sluts") shouldn't be acknowledged as persons.

What do you mean by "persons"? They are human beings but they are also vermin. He covered that as well

http://www.fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=73705
[An answer to the question, "what exactly is wrong with being a slut?"]

Well, sluts are bad for men, women, and children. Did I miss anything? Oh yes, sluts destroy civilization.

Sluts are bad for men because they only have sex with the "top" men. Most men have much less sex in a slut culture than in a monogamous culture where every man gets a woman.

In a slut culture, men are trained to behave in whatever way attracts women. Sluts are attracted to jerks, so men are trained to be jerks. So the quality of men declines in a slut culture.

In a slut culture, men constantly hit on women. This causes women to become hostile, rude, and obnoxious. Because men are desperate and will take anything, women lose any motivation to care about their appearance. So sluts become ugly hostile creatures.

As sluts age, they lose their ability to attract the "top" men, but still reject all other men. So they become spinsters. So now, not only are they ugly and hostile, but they are also miserable.

In a slut culture, illegitimacy rates go way up. Children are raised without fathers. This usually makes for a less happy childhood. So children are less happy in a slut culture.

In the book "Sex and Culture", Unwin showed that civilization depends on female chastity and that a civilized culture cannot survive more than three generations of sluts without collapsing. We can see this process before our eyes.

Any more questions?


Why should rape apes have the right to be acknowledged as persons and have access to all the benefits this entails?
And, since you enthusiastically adapted their behaviour with women: Are you a rape ape and if no, why not?

Rape apes aren't seen as that in sane societies. There are no societies more welcoming to rape than feminist ones. In sane societies rape was usually punishable vy death and was a grave property crime.

I haven't tried this behavior yet though. I want to try it simply to show morons I can procreate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back