Jason Grant / Jasonafex / JasonafexFA / Amorous and his girlfriend Kabier / Kaitlyn Layne Kelley - popufur "animator", drama magnet, scam artist, JIGGLEBONES

If they were asking about the comic I would think they'd specify it dude.
If you don't like what we have to say in the thread, don't read it.
The majority of the questions I receive are in regards to my content. You are falling upon assumptions at this point. If that's all you have, pretty weak 'gotcha!' tbh. The Avatar is even from BBS, which is exactly when Mans Best Friend was being made.
What’s is this look like, your fuck ‘safe spase.’ If you post something stupid, every one has the right to criticize you.
You aren't even criticizing me, your criticizing a parody strawman of me lmao. Buzzword Jason doesn't exist. If you actually have something constructive to say about our content, why not post it on the actual content where it can be read?

As much fun as is this.

Where's the new website you were shilling?

With the manila folder of Real Business or whatever the fuck it was. Thats what I'm waiting for.

I'm actually legit interested in whatever you manage to cobble together, admittedly because it'll be a dumpster fire. But still.

Business is a long process. I can't really say anything about it since real Lawyers, Contracts etc. If and when it's a venture that comes to fruition, you won't really hear anything of it until next year. Atm we're prioritising non furry stuff first for atleast a year and see if double dipping back into the community is really that great of an investment. We would be incurring the overwhelming majority of the financial and labour risk, after all. It may be that come 2020, we find we're better off in the normie sphere. We are quite enjoying Newgrounds so far. A furry platform made by us would honestly just be an inferior imitation.
 
You aren't even criticizing me, your criticizing a parody strawman of me lmao.
701994
 
The majority of the questions I receive are in regards to my content. You are falling upon assumptions at this point. If that's all you have, pretty weak 'gotcha!' tbh. The Avatar is even from BBS, which is exactly when Mans Best Friend was being made.
Doesn't that mean you also just assumed context yourself instead of asking for clarification?
 
Are you implying that you faked the evidence people use against you?
You keep confusing evidence with satire. ED is a parody platform, you do realize that right? Not my fault autism takes that shit seriously.

This is still all you can come up with? Ad hominem attacks and strawmen? I thought that was what your opponents did. Why are you stopping to their level? And still no answer to anything but one question people asked you. Why do hesitant to answer?
Projecting at this point. If you can only hold a conversation with yourself, jerk off in the mirror.

The question was about zoophilia irl, not in fantasy. The context you claim was absent is fully there and everyone can see it. Nobody mentioned jack shit about your comic in regards to the screencapped that was provided, yet you keep bringing it up. Why?
Flat out lying now. The question is 'How far is too far?' I left my opinion that the line is drawn at consent. That doesn't conform to your narrative, so you just bullshit your own reality.

No-one mentioned the comic in the screencap because it was cropped and archived from years ago when it was made. You really can't be this stupid. If you are, I pity you.

That's really all you have to offer here isn't it.
 
You really can't be this stupid. If you are, I pity you.
I want you to go in front of a mirror and repeat this until your brain starts working again.
All you have done is ignore what people have said when it's something you don't like and accuse them of doing the same. You did this years ago, and you're doing it now. You haven't changed one bit.
 
Flat out lying now. The question is 'How far is too far?' I left my opinion that the line is drawn at consent. That doesn't conform to your narrative, so you just bullshit your own reality.

No-one mentioned the comic in the screencap because it was cropped and archived from years ago when it was made. You really can't be this stupid. If you are, I pity you.
Nigger, this was the question
701995
 
Hey Jason, hit up any other 15 year olds lately to voice in your jiggly broken pornos? It’s funny to me how Kabier’s furry phase started with you and she is now “disowning” it, are you proud of your cashcow? Is she still your primary source of income?
 
And keeping it illegal is controversial how, exactly? Try harder. Are you upset that I bothered to answer it at all?
No one is arguing about you wanting it to stay illegal. He's pointing out you saying you didn't know if the question was talking about your dogfucking comic is bullshit because it specifies REAL LIFE beastility, not your "muh fantasy" shit.
 
You keep confusing evidence with satire. ED is a parody platform, you do realize that right? Not my fault autism takes that shit seriously.


Projecting at this point. If you can only hold a conversation with yourself, jerk off in the mirror.


Flat out lying now. The question is 'How far is too far?' I left my opinion that the line is drawn at consent. That doesn't conform to your narrative, so you just bullshit your own reality.

No-one mentioned the comic in the screencap because it was cropped and archived from years ago when it was made. You really can't be this stupid. If you are, I pity you.


That's really all you have to offer here isn't it.
How is asking you to answer all the questions presented to you projecting? I’m not the one pulling sophistry out of her ass and saying that I made my own troll wiki article, you did.

And keeping it illegal is controversial how, exactly? Try harder. Are you upset that I bothered to answer it at all?
Nigga, you say that you see no harm in it then say it should stay illegal. Which is it?
 
No one is arguing about you wanting it to stay illegal. He's pointing out you saying you didn't know if the question was talking about your dogfucking comic is bullshit because it specifies REAL LIFE beastility, not your "muh fantasy" shit.
Then you admit you have no point. If there is no connection to the comic, and the answer makes sense. The controversy is....?
 
Then you admit you have no point. If there is no connection to the comic, and the answer makes sense. The controversy is....?
LOL
My point was that you don't have a point, because the only one you had was claiming "I didn't know if they meant the real thing or our comic"
The majority of the questions I receive are in regards to my content. You are falling upon assumptions at this point. If that's all you have, pretty weak 'gotcha!' tbh. The Avatar is even from BBS, which is exactly when Mans Best Friend was being made.
Your words. Your point, which falls flat on it's face when the question itself outright specified it wasn't talking about your comic.
Tell me I'm taking this out of context, please, because it's just going to make you look even more retarded than before.
 
Hey Jason, hit up any other 15 year olds lately to voice in your jiggly broken pornos? It’s funny to me how Kabier’s furry phase started with you and she is now “disowning” it, are you proud of your cashcow? Is she still your primary source of income?
So lets say any artist on FA takes a commission, and then later that commissioner states they are underage. What happens? Who is responsible?

Last I checked, people need to state their age when joining FA. Why wasn't Kabier banned if she was underage? What about the boyfriend she had in the commission who payed for it, who also offered voicework? Isn't that soliciting a minor by your own logic?

How is asking you to answer all the questions presented to you projecting? I’m not the one pulling sophistry out of her ass and saying that I made my own troll wiki article, you did.


Nigga, you say that you see no harm in it then say it should stay illegal. Which is it?
Your questions were answered, you just can't read. If you think stating something as illegal is approval, you still can't read.
 
Your questions were answered, you just can't read. If you think stating something as illegal is approval, you still can't read.
Explain how you can't see the harm in something but still think it should be illegal
Last I checked, people need to state their age when joining FA. Why wasn't Kabier banned if she was underage?
Yes because NO ONE HAS EVER LIED ABOUT THEIR AGE BEFORE
 
Explain how you can't see the harm in something but still think it should be illegal

Yes because NO ONE HAS EVER LIED ABOUT THEIR AGE BEFORE
So which is it:
• Commissioners lie and should be held accountable for their own actions
• Creators are responsible for the age of their commissioner

Pick one, it can't be both.
 
So which is it:
• Commissioners lie and should be held accountable for their own actions
• Creators are responsible for the age of their commissioner

Pick one, it can't be both.
If someone is caught lying about their age in the moment and said age means they shouldn't be on a site, then they need to be banned.
 
So lets say any artist on FA takes a commission, and then later that commissioner states they are underage. What happens? Who is responsible?

Last I checked, people need to state their age when joining FA. Why wasn't Kabier banned if she was underage? What about the boyfriend she had in the commission who payed for it, who also offered voicework? Isn't that soliciting a minor by your own logic?


Your questions were answered, you just can't read. If you think stating something as illegal is approval, you still can't read.

Kabier wasn’t banned because she has erased any indication of her age after connecting with you, we have several of her old deviantart pages archived with her birth date, I don’t understand why you’re attempting to dig yourself in a hole by denying this. You had the responsibility of knowing her age for a pornographic piece, especially after you pursued her during this period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cryptozoology
Back