Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, I'm pretty sure I'm a man. I have all the proper parts and the right attitude. Sex just isn't a big part of my life and I'm content enough with it. Why is that bad in your eyes?
It's not bad in my eyes, it's great in my eyes. what's bad is that you push this as normal and you're proud of it. i hope you never breed so from that standpoint your attitude is perfect
 
To most people these are needs. If you can't figure that out you're insane.
Your comparison is dumb, since women in chastity don't suffer - their libidos are low and they follow the dominant culture, which makes them happy.
"Most people"....no, that's a generalization with no source, so we're tossing that out. Remember, wants =/= needs. Please really try to use your melon on that one.

Also, women in chastity do suffer, since NOT ALL OF THEM WOULD CONSENT TO CHASTITY, EVEN IN A DOMINANT CULTURE, BECAUSE THAT IS HUMAN NATURE. You cannot speak for what is best for every single woman, especially when its something as ridiculous as proposing what basically amounts to sexual slavery.

That you think every man needs sex yet every woman is fine as a piece of meat to be sold reveals what a deeply disturbed person you are.
 
I know I said this earlier, but wow, shits still going. Over 200 pages, continuously shitposting. I've honestly never seen such a spectacle. How long will this go on? WILL the ride never end? Time will tell I suppose...
 
and i think you missed my point, as usual
I'm not sure you have one aside from "I love me some incest and rape."
You're seriously disturbed if you tried to bang your own mom, dude. Even normal Supervirgins don't do that.
 
"Most people"....no, that's a generalization with no source, so we're tossing that out. Remember, wants =/= needs. Please really try to use your melon on that one.

Also, women in chastity do suffer, since NOT ALL OF THEM WOULD CONSENT TO CHASTITY, EVEN IN A DOMINANT CULTURE, BECAUSE THAT IS HUMAN NATURE. You cannot speak for what is best for every single woman, especially when its something as ridiculous as proposing what basically amounts to sexual slavery.

That you think every man needs sex yet every woman is fine as a piece of meat to be sold reveals what a deeply disturbed person you are.
most people in history had families. no, they don't suffer and THEY DO CONSENT to chastity. women always consent to what is dominant. women were the greatest slut shamers in patriarchy.
sexual slavery? that's what your thugs want from you.
 
most people in history had families. no, they don't suffer and THEY DO CONSENT to chastity. women always consent to what is dominant. women were the greatest slut shamers in patriarchy.
sexual slavery? that's what your thugs want from you.
1. Most people in history had families, yes? That doesn't mean anything. In fact, since there are some people who didn't reproduce, that is proof that men do not NEED sex to survive! FASCINATING!
2. No, we don't consent to chastity, because that's your weirdo fantasy. No, we don't consent to whatever is dominant, or we still wouldn't be able to vote.
3. No, sexual slavery is what you want - a society where women are kept in chastity via threat of punishment.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Da Pickle Monsta
nama - 1. ramblings. your conclusion doesn't follow
2. women always consent to dominant thing. suffrage became dominant when morality collapsed
3. no threat of anything. social norms. same with you sucking 40 cocks a day. you know you will be seen as an outcast if you don't
 
I am a "modern western woman". I was raped. I did not like it. I am not insanely religious or insanely feminist (as you stated women have to be to not want to be raped). The man that raped me was not wealthy, well off, or "sexy". He was a disgusting monster who felt that women were property and that he had some right over me because he was a man (sound familiar to you?). Again. I did not like it or ask for it. I was not "dressed provocatively" either. I was dressed in a sweatshirt and jeans. Not even tight ones either. No skin was being flashed except for my face and maybe my throat, hands, and maybe, just maybe, my ankle (gasp!). I did not ask to be raped. I did not want it. And I certainly did not enjoy it in any way. End of story. Everything you have said has just been disproven.

No woman, even a "modern western woman", wants to be raped. It is the most horrible experience I have ever gone through. I wouldn't even wish it on someone vile like you.

And before you go on a "how can you call me vile" rant... You fucking beat up your parents, asked your mom to fuck you, blatantly said you would consider beating and blackmailing (with horse porn) your girlfriend/date so that she couldn't leave you, and actually think rape is ok and desirable. Those are qualities of a vile individual.

But please, do not write back about just the vile individual part. There have been at least 20 people on here that have said "I am a woman, I do not like rape/violence in my relationship" and you have simply called them insane. I want you to actually comprehend this. I have just told you that the things you have been claiming all women want, is false. No woman wants to be raped. This isn't feminism talking. This isn't religion talking. This is a woman straight up telling you women do not want to be raped or abused. Why can't you understand this fact? Am I, as a woman, completely unable to comprehend what I want and thus need a man, like you, to tell me what I actually want?
I'm quoting this so you do not simply bypass it (again).

@Holden How do you respond to this?

Cut: actually had a whole 'nother question but I deleted it so you didn't get sidetracked.
 
Last edited:
clown doll - imported women are unlikely to come here and we have a fascist govt when it comes to giving these women citizenship or rights
@Holden, do you know how to tag people on this site? It's a leetle more complicated if usernames have spaces, in which case use a [ user=1337] tag, replace 1337 with the actual user and remove the space. I'll tag @Clown Doll for demonstration purposes.

Also, yes Marjan, forcing women into chastity because they don't know what's best for them is sexual slavery, just like if I forced my girlfriend to have sex when she doesn't want to. What is not sexual slavery, is giving women the right to CHOOSE WHO THEY HAVE CONSENSUAL SEX WITH, WHEN, WHERE, HOW, AND WHY THEY HAVE IT. That's quite the fucking opposite of sexual slavery, good sir, and if you argue against that solid piece of reason, then I think I found the new champion of mental gymnastics.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: namazuros
nama - 1. ramblings. your conclusion doesn't follow
2. women always consent to dominant thing. suffrage became dominant when morality collapsed
3. no threat of anything. social norms. same with you sucking 40 cocks a day. you know you will be seen as an outcast if you don't
1. Actually it does. A need is something that is necessary for organisms to live a healthy life. Sex is not a need, it is a want. I cannot be more clear on this. Sex is not necessary for your survival. The survival of the species, yes, we do need to reproduce. But you will not burst into flame if you're a virgin at 30. Also, if you care so much about getting sex, why are you so against premarital sex and for prostitution?
2. lolno, I don't even know what to say beyond that. Yes, the women in Saudi Arabia are totally fine with how they're treated.
3. How would anyone know? Do you assume we keep a running tally on hand throughout the day in case we are checked by the police?

What is your fascination with the number 40? You seem to constantly bring up "sucking 40 dicks" or "fucking 40 apes".
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Saney
nama - 1. ramblings. your conclusion doesn't follow
2. women always consent to dominant thing. suffrage became dominant when morality collapsed
3. no threat of anything. social norms. same with you sucking 40 cocks a day. you know you will be seen as an outcast if you don't

For someone that desperately wants to get laid you sure don't bother to learn how to talk to women. Also, you said you don't use InCel as a disease, explain pls: "Incel is debilitating and life threatening. It is a basic human need - to touch and be touched. We are sexual beings ( except for those who are not which I explain in my blog). That bond is so essential to a sense of value and meaning in life. I know that emphatetic people who have met those suffering from incel appreciate that a lot more."

"Normal people need intimacy to lead normal lives. It is about sex but it's not. It's about sex in that you want to be sexually desired by someone that you, in turn, desire sexually (and romantically). It's a mutuality - an equality - stasis, if you will. Just the right balance between you and her... a spark, an ember that burns through out a long life. It's not about how many times a day/week/month and it's not even about quality (that varies) - it's about consistency, security, safety, comfort, and freedom.

Every incel I met agrees with my stance on therapy. In the general sense, it's not going to help you when it comes to this issue. Drugs can't treat incel - not in a worthwhile way - being numbed to reality is no true fix. I think there might be some therapist, somewhere that might be able to help but the chances of finding him/her is about the same as I feel finding a life partner would be and possibly harder. So, don't bank on that.
TAC see is therapy as a religion. I am a non-theist and have no religious convictions.

My parents should have found a way to help me with incel much sooner than when I was 23- my discomfort when it first started would have been much, much easier to tolerate and my situation would have been easier and elastic to change. By the time I noticed it, both me and they were already behind the ball. I've been playing catch up since I was 16. And, like many people online, my parents then piled it on by sabotaging my self esteem by blaming me for issues I couldn't really control.

My parents did fail to help me, that is true. But they couldn't have changed my personality and I'm glad for it today. You see, most kids I grew up with were utter scum and in order to be successful with girls I knew from my class or neighborhood you had to be utter scum.

What my parents should have done probably amounts to what I call "the prostitute scam".
They are landlords with a number of apartments. When I was 14-15 they should have rented the apartment to a prostitute or an escort who would seduce me, take my virginity and then leave, for me to never contact her again.
I would cry and bitch about it for months but I'd have a valuable experience and could build on that. It would be extremely costly but nothing to compared to what they had to pay for my medical bills, lawyer bills, cost of my prolonged schooling etc later.

They failed to do that because they weren't aware of what I'm going through.

When it comes to asking my mother for sex, that thing is blown way out of proportion.
You have to understand that by the time I asked my mother for sex it was much too late. I was already almost 23 and a virgin.
I don't blame my mother for not having sex with me at that time. It would have changed nothing for better. It would just be traumatic.
My best chances of beating this thing were gone before Pluto stopped being a planet. By early 2005 it was pretty much over.
One big chance came in 2007 and that was it. Game over.
There was nothing my mother could have done by the time I asked for sex to help me. She was right to refuse me. I got angry over it but it doesn't make her a criminal. Her failure to save my life does. They offered to buy me a prostitute when I was nearing 23 as a virgin, but it was too late by that time and I didn't want a prostitute anyway. It was much too late by then."
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BriarHeart
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back