I obviously didn't get there in time because there are no posts visible by anyone named Alex Farlech but here, Dobson pulling the "This comic is not for you" card:
View attachment 709809
previous comment included for context:
View attachment 709816
View attachment 709817
Another guy from earlier gets dogpiled because Dobson and his asspatters don't know bad writing when they see it:
View attachment 709821
And Alannah Raitt DEFINITELY understands neither bad writing nor "perfect" characters (and how they relate to Mary Sues):
View attachment 709851
View attachment 709825
View attachment 709852
View attachment 709834
Dobson admits he can't understand sarcasm (though it is correct sarcasm is hard to convey over text):
View attachment 709853
View attachment 709855
A regular asspatter (Michea Bonilla) points out the creepiness of the last panel of Dobs comic:
View attachment 709854
(yeah, there's actually a facebook group called 'Mansplain me harder, Daddy'. UGH. Closed group though, because OF COURSE it is)
A well thought-out and elucidated point! ….I predict Dobson will dispense with it in an hour or less.
View attachment 709856
Another strawman asspatter:
View attachment 709857
More kinda-asspatting:
View attachment 709858
More conflation strawmanning:
View attachment 709860
View attachment 709861
No, nobody cares if a character is canonically gay. What people do object to, is canonically STRAIGHT characters suddenly changing sexuality. If sexuality is immutable, then their sexuality should not be changed, because otherwise it looks like that is possible and we all know it's not, right IngSoc?