- Joined
- Oct 17, 2015
https://kiwifarms.net/attachments/1975258_10203562756926551_2293414134366341184_n-jpg.120457/
(Credit to @Randall Fragg and @CatParty for discovery.)
Meet Alejandro Ricondo Barreiro, also known as Kukuruyo. He's a webcomic artist known for his three comics: Monster Girls on Tour, My Little Eve, Guild Adventure, and Gamergate Life. Aside from his Gamergate Life comic, he has a fetish for monster girls, judging from the theme of his three comics and his art pages (TouchFluffyTail, DeviantArt).
An example of a Gamergate life strip.
Two of his comics, Guild Adventure and Gamergate Life, caught the attention of the Bad Webcomics Wiki, where they put up reviews of the two comics on their site (Guild Adventure) (Gamergate Life). Being the shitty webcomic artist that he is, Kukuruyo/Alejandro got defensive and tweeted this gem claiming the BWW was run by "antis" and even called them "feminists":
(https://archive.is/KY9bO)
He also made these comments regarding the Bad Webcomics Wiki, as recorded by the wiki itself (source):
He was also involved in another drama where he was commissioned an image of a nude Ms. Marvel
(this one). Needless to say people were less than amused started calling him a pedophile. His response? You have to read it yourself
(warning, long) (source):
Note the annotated parts of his spergery.
TL;DR of his reasoning: A nude drawing of a teenage Ms. Marvel is not pedophilia because it is a drawing, pedophilia is explicitly the attraction to a prepubescent body, and finally, imaginary characters have no real age.
What's interesting is apparently Gamergate decides to defend this shitbag, like their antiGG compatriots did with Nicholas Nyberg:
Considering his history of noticing criticism of his comics, I wonder when he will discover this thread here...
As always, discuss.
(Credit to @Randall Fragg and @CatParty for discovery.)
DA account: http://kukuruyoart.deviantart.com/
Comic/hentai art site: http://kukuruyo.com/
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/kukuruyo
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/user/kukuruyo/
MyAnimeList: http://myanimelist.net/profile/kukuruyo
TouchFluffyTail (a monstergirl site): http://touchfluffytail.org/?page_id=3777
Kukuruyo FB page: https://www.facebook.com/KuKuruYo/
Author FB page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1143857628
G+ page: https://plus.google.com/113450967805689360952
LinkedIn: https://es.linkedin.com/in/alejandro-ricondo-barreiro-12914151
Disqus: https://disqus.com/by/kukuruyo/
Comic/hentai art site: http://kukuruyo.com/
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/kukuruyo
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/user/kukuruyo/
MyAnimeList: http://myanimelist.net/profile/kukuruyo
TouchFluffyTail (a monstergirl site): http://touchfluffytail.org/?page_id=3777
Kukuruyo FB page: https://www.facebook.com/KuKuruYo/
Author FB page: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1143857628
G+ page: https://plus.google.com/113450967805689360952
LinkedIn: https://es.linkedin.com/in/alejandro-ricondo-barreiro-12914151
Disqus: https://disqus.com/by/kukuruyo/
An example of a Gamergate life strip.
Two of his comics, Guild Adventure and Gamergate Life, caught the attention of the Bad Webcomics Wiki, where they put up reviews of the two comics on their site (Guild Adventure) (Gamergate Life). Being the shitty webcomic artist that he is, Kukuruyo/Alejandro got defensive and tweeted this gem claiming the BWW was run by "antis" and even called them "feminists":
(https://archive.is/KY9bO)
He also made these comments regarding the Bad Webcomics Wiki, as recorded by the wiki itself (source):
Alejandro Ricondo Barreiro said:
In all his comments, he can't quite decide whether BWW was used by SJWs to attack his comics, BWW are trolls, and he trolled BWW. Obvious signs of butthurt of having his comics being reviewed.Alejandro Ricondo Barreiro said:
He was also involved in another drama where he was commissioned an image of a nude Ms. Marvel
(this one). Needless to say people were less than amused started calling him a pedophile. His response? You have to read it yourself
(warning, long) (source):It seems that, predictably, Social justice warriors are butthurt about my Hugo awards nomination and, as they try to find anything to attack me, they have targeted this drawing, accusing me of doing Child pornography, or of “pedophilia”, because aparently the character must be 16 in one of it’s versions (something i didn’t even know, but that’s beyond the point) and want me to remove the drawing.
Since i’m a sane person who doesn’t go to Tumblr, my first, short, and concise reaction about those claims and petition is: Fuck you. I’m not removing shit. I’m not gona censor myself because you got offended.
Instead, i’ll be lecturing them in some dosis of reality. Because they very much need it.
So, we have a drawing of a character with an adult body, whos just standing still while half naked. Calling the reactions i’ve seen “overreactions” would be a compliment, as is tremendusly tame, and the internet is full to the head of erotic or hentai drawings of anime characters of 16-17 years old.
First of, this is a DRAWING. You know, those things that are done with pencils and colors and stuff? like, you know, without absolutely no participation or harm of any real person? yes, that, you got it. So, a drawing is NOT child pornography. It’s NOT REAL, ok? it’s just a combination of lines placed in an specific way by an artist, not an actual person doing anything. Even if i actually drawed a little children having sex (which i have not), it would still not be child pornography, as no real person has done, or been done, anything. Drawings of characters of any age are legal in almost all the countries in the world, and Spain is one of them. Sucks to be you, Canada.
Secondly, calling a developed body of an anime style drawing of a 16 years old “pedophilia” is like the most retarded thing anyone can ever say. Pedophilia is the attraction for underdeveloped bodies, for children who have not yet passed puberty. Pedophilia is not the “number”. A pedophile is not someone who feels attraction for a woman with the body of Scarlett johanson who happens to be 17 years and 360 days. It’s someone who feels attracted by someone with an 8 years old body. What, do you think that pedophiles feel nothing when they look to a child and then someone says “oh, and she/he has 8 years old” and then suddenly they have an erection? do you think they get erections looking at the number 8 or something? bullshit.
“Pedophilia” would be feeling attracted to a drawing of an 8 years old who is clearly visualy depicted as an 8 years old. Now look at how my characters (or any anime character, since i see this accusation being throwed a lot by SJWs about anime) are drawed. They have adult, attractive, developed bodies. Even if a character has “16”, it’s drawn with an adult body. That’s NOT pedophilia. You cannot look at characters like the ones in Dead or alive and say it’s pedophilia because some of them are 16. That’s simply retarded. (fuck, they even use the same body bases for many of them, they just change the age in the character description). And the same for my drawings. You cannot look at a drawing like this and say it’s pedophilia because she technicaly has 16 in the original comic. Specialy because i didn’t know her age, and just drawed a body of about 20 years old! don’t you see how ridiculous this is? if i say “it’s ms.marvel when she grows to 20 years old” it’s suddenly ok?
And third, imaginary characters have no “age”. The age of a fictional character is just a number put there by the creator. It means nothing. You can as well say she has 14 or 30 depending on the drawing style. Do you want me to show some examples to see how ridiculous you sound? look closely:
-The “kid” in the far right side of this image has 27 years old. Not pedophilia by SJW standards. The blue hair girl in middle has 1 year old. Pedophilia by SJW standards. The guy at the far left has 8.000 years old. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPT3UPWYAEgLc4.jpg:large
-She (later he) has one year old. Pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPVA2xWYAQImxx.jpg:large
-One year old. Pedophilia by SJW standards https://sneed-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/c7/35/95/c7359503bf32cd8bd5e0871d07a96a02.jpg
-Hes 17. Pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPYPNQW0AAKY7n.jpg:large
-All the characters in this image are over 18. Faping to the little one is not pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPUF62WIAA3FKR.jpg:large
-This characters go to university. Masturbating to the little blonde one is not pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPUA86W0AIE_UP.jpg:large
-This character has 3 years old. Pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPUabsWkAARg8E.jpg:large
-Sarah Nyberg, not pedophile by SJW standards.
But wait, i can complicate things a little more!
-This is a 10 years old girl who has possessed the body of a 38 years old woman who, due to her powers, stoped aging at 20…so…pedophilia?…not pedophilia?… http://i.blogs.es/357936/3rd-brithday-000/original.jpg
-And what about Real life series of school life? the actors for those roles are usually 20+ or even 30, but in the series they are suposedly 16-17. So, if you like them you are a pedophile?
-If i just say that a drawing is “the character if she had 18 years old” then it would be ok, even if i drawed her exactly the same as the original 18 version?
Don’t worry because i can simplify all this: What’s important is the body. Being attracted to developed, past puberty, adult bodies is completely normal, regardless of the “number” the artist decides to write in the character profile. That’s why there are so many anime characters that people are attracted to even if they are technicaly 16 (which, btw, is the age of consent for japan, spain, and many other places), because their bodies are drawn so adult that they can be any range between 16-30, or even 14 if you want to go to Evangelion. And for fucks sake look at this image: http://k39.kn3.net/taringa/2/1/1/4/2/3/20/cyan_miku/862.jpg?2207
Since i’m a sane person who doesn’t go to Tumblr, my first, short, and concise reaction about those claims and petition is: Fuck you. I’m not removing shit. I’m not gona censor myself because you got offended.
Instead, i’ll be lecturing them in some dosis of reality. Because they very much need it.
So, we have a drawing of a character with an adult body, whos just standing still while half naked. Calling the reactions i’ve seen “overreactions” would be a compliment, as is tremendusly tame, and the internet is full to the head of erotic or hentai drawings of anime characters of 16-17 years old.
First of, this is a DRAWING. You know, those things that are done with pencils and colors and stuff? like, you know, without absolutely no participation or harm of any real person? yes, that, you got it. So, a drawing is NOT child pornography. It’s NOT REAL, ok? it’s just a combination of lines placed in an specific way by an artist, not an actual person doing anything. Even if i actually drawed a little children having sex (which i have not), it would still not be child pornography, as no real person has done, or been done, anything. Drawings of characters of any age are legal in almost all the countries in the world, and Spain is one of them. Sucks to be you, Canada.
Secondly, calling a developed body of an anime style drawing of a 16 years old “pedophilia” is like the most retarded thing anyone can ever say. Pedophilia is the attraction for underdeveloped bodies, for children who have not yet passed puberty. Pedophilia is not the “number”. A pedophile is not someone who feels attraction for a woman with the body of Scarlett johanson who happens to be 17 years and 360 days. It’s someone who feels attracted by someone with an 8 years old body. What, do you think that pedophiles feel nothing when they look to a child and then someone says “oh, and she/he has 8 years old” and then suddenly they have an erection? do you think they get erections looking at the number 8 or something? bullshit.
“Pedophilia” would be feeling attracted to a drawing of an 8 years old who is clearly visualy depicted as an 8 years old. Now look at how my characters (or any anime character, since i see this accusation being throwed a lot by SJWs about anime) are drawed. They have adult, attractive, developed bodies. Even if a character has “16”, it’s drawn with an adult body. That’s NOT pedophilia. You cannot look at characters like the ones in Dead or alive and say it’s pedophilia because some of them are 16. That’s simply retarded. (fuck, they even use the same body bases for many of them, they just change the age in the character description). And the same for my drawings. You cannot look at a drawing like this and say it’s pedophilia because she technicaly has 16 in the original comic. Specialy because i didn’t know her age, and just drawed a body of about 20 years old! don’t you see how ridiculous this is? if i say “it’s ms.marvel when she grows to 20 years old” it’s suddenly ok?
And third, imaginary characters have no “age”. The age of a fictional character is just a number put there by the creator. It means nothing. You can as well say she has 14 or 30 depending on the drawing style. Do you want me to show some examples to see how ridiculous you sound? look closely:
-The “kid” in the far right side of this image has 27 years old. Not pedophilia by SJW standards. The blue hair girl in middle has 1 year old. Pedophilia by SJW standards. The guy at the far left has 8.000 years old. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPT3UPWYAEgLc4.jpg:large
-She (later he) has one year old. Pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPVA2xWYAQImxx.jpg:large
-One year old. Pedophilia by SJW standards https://sneed-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/c7/35/95/c7359503bf32cd8bd5e0871d07a96a02.jpg
-Hes 17. Pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPYPNQW0AAKY7n.jpg:large
-All the characters in this image are over 18. Faping to the little one is not pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPUF62WIAA3FKR.jpg:large
-This characters go to university. Masturbating to the little blonde one is not pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPUA86W0AIE_UP.jpg:large
-This character has 3 years old. Pedophilia by SJW standards https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChPUabsWkAARg8E.jpg:large
-Sarah Nyberg, not pedophile by SJW standards.
But wait, i can complicate things a little more!
-This is a 10 years old girl who has possessed the body of a 38 years old woman who, due to her powers, stoped aging at 20…so…pedophilia?…not pedophilia?… http://i.blogs.es/357936/3rd-brithday-000/original.jpg
-And what about Real life series of school life? the actors for those roles are usually 20+ or even 30, but in the series they are suposedly 16-17. So, if you like them you are a pedophile?
-If i just say that a drawing is “the character if she had 18 years old” then it would be ok, even if i drawed her exactly the same as the original 18 version?
Don’t worry because i can simplify all this: What’s important is the body. Being attracted to developed, past puberty, adult bodies is completely normal, regardless of the “number” the artist decides to write in the character profile. That’s why there are so many anime characters that people are attracted to even if they are technicaly 16 (which, btw, is the age of consent for japan, spain, and many other places), because their bodies are drawn so adult that they can be any range between 16-30, or even 14 if you want to go to Evangelion. And for fucks sake look at this image: http://k39.kn3.net/taringa/2/1/1/4/2/3/20/cyan_miku/862.jpg?2207
TL;DR of his reasoning: A nude drawing of a teenage Ms. Marvel is not pedophilia because it is a drawing, pedophilia is explicitly the attraction to a prepubescent body, and finally, imaginary characters have no real age.
What's interesting is apparently Gamergate decides to defend this shitbag, like their antiGG compatriots did with Nicholas Nyberg:
Considering his history of noticing criticism of his comics, I wonder when he will discover this thread here...
As always, discuss.
