Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

boulderblundermatt90 said:
i refuse to believe ron is a human. he is some exceptional monkey that learned how to dress and speak. or the descendant of a exceptional alien and a monkey. this is too stupid. too, too, stupid.

I would like to call attention to the formatting of the greivance section. notice how he forgets to delete a -link here- after putting a link and how he failed to put a link to the gofundme.
Click to expand...

That written document was the product of someone slow in the mind. He couldn't follow the simplest instructions, left answers blank even though the instructions clearly stated to answer all questions, even if only to say you didn't know the answer.

He literally couldn't even fill out his own name. That is how fucking dumb this man is.

Soy apparently causes brain damage as well as shrinking your balls to the size of raisins.

I wouldn't trust this man to fill out a parking ticket much less a mortgage. The man is a pathetic, drooling moron.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Dog Prom 3D, Dededon't and 9 others
www.courtlistener.com

Vice v. Kasprzak, 318 S.W.3d 1 – CourtListener.com

Opinion for Vice v. Kasprzak, 318 S.W.3d 1 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
www.courtlistener.com www.courtlistener.com
archive.fo

Vice v. Kasprzak, 318 S.W.3d 1 – CourtListener.com

archived 6 Apr 2019 05:46:04 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo
Limited-purpose public figures are those persons who "thrust themselves to the forefront of particular public controversies in order to influence the resolution of the issues involved."
Click to expand...

Possibly disqualifies Vic.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, damian and LobotomizedFerret
All those poor chairs.
716883
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
  • DRINK!
Reactions: not william stenchever, Male Idiot, SinglePlayerCarl and 10 others
Farmer Y said:
All those poor chairs.
View attachment 716883
Click to expand...
This. This right here is the real tragedy. For years and years, these chairs have been screaming out, trying to tell their story. But no one would listen to them, because Shane just held too much power. He was so important, he could silence the police, as well as control the narrative by directly taking control of Twitter and Facebook. Other chairs were too afraid too speak out, for fear of never being sat on, or worse, becoming Shane's new chair. This has to stop. We need to...#BeThere.
 
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: not william stenchever, Kosher Salt, ChevroletBlackboard and 3 others
RodgerDodger said:
That is the question. It's privileged with regard to the lawyer whom the complaint is filed against, but this is sworn proof of Toye's ongoing campaign of defamation against Vic, who is not a lawyer in Texas. Is this viable as evidence in Vic's looming lawsuit against Toye? Is it a valid separate cause of action?
Click to expand...

He can't be independently sued over these privileged statements. To protect legitimate complainants from retaliation by misbehaving lawyers, you can't be sued over reports to the Bar Association. As an unfortunate consequence, this means idiots like Ron Soye can flat out lie on these documents and get away with it unless he's somehow criminally prosecuted for it, which won't happen.

However, the contents of the document and his statements in it are relevant to his established habits of lying and dishonesty and making false statements, his apparent inability to understand various legal concepts like "sexual assault" and "harassment," and his general untrustworthiness. So he could probably be asked about this bullshit in deposition and it could be used to impeach him on cross examination and establish that he is a man with a habit of lying, impeaching his testimony on any issue.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Dog Prom 3D, Male Idiot and 7 others
Fuck The Chairs. What about the poor beds? Those mattresses need therapy.

I didn't see the stream but what (in the stream) was so interesting about Mr/Mrs Soye that was unearthed? I thought Monica was married to him?
 
jellycar said:
Fuck The Chairs. What about the poor beds? Those mattresses need therapy.

I didn't see the stream but what (in the stream) was so interesting about Mr/Mrs Soye that was unearthed? I thought Monica was married to him?
Click to expand...
Ms Choy is gender confused, can't read instructions to fill out a form, doesn't know what sexual assault is, lied about Vic sending his fans to harass and send death threats, and had his complaint that the Beard is unethical dismissed.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Le Pew, Zero Day Defense and 6 others
www.courtlistener.com

Vice v. Kasprzak, 318 S.W.3d 1 – CourtListener.com

Opinion for Vice v. Kasprzak, 318 S.W.3d 1 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
www.courtlistener.com www.courtlistener.com
archive.fo

Vice v. Kasprzak, 318 S.W.3d 1 – CourtListener.com

archived 6 Apr 2019 05:46:04 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo

But by omitting key facts and falsely juxtaposing others, a publication may be both false and defamatory. Id. The test as to whether the words or statements are actually defamatory is the reasonable person test and not the opinion of the plaintiff.
Click to expand...

To determine whether an allegedly defamatory publication is substantially true, we consider whether it is more damaging to the plaintiff's reputation in the mind of the average person than a truthful statement would have been. McIlvain, 794 S.W.2d at 16; Grotti, 188 S.W.3d at 775; Simmons, 920 S.W.2d at 447. This involves looking to the "gist" of *18 the publication. McIlvain, 794 S.W.2d at 16; Grotti, 188 S.W.3d at 775. The analysis for distinguishing between an actionable statement of fact and a constitutionally protected expression of opinion focuses on the statement's verifiability and the entire context in which it was made. Simmons, 920 S.W.2d at 447. If a statement has the same effect on the mind of the average reader as a true statement, then it is not false. Masson, 501 U.S. at 517, 111 S.Ct. at 2433; McIlvain, 794 S.W.2d at 16. If the article correctly conveys the story's gist but relayed certain details incorrectly, the article will be considered substantially true. See Turner, 38 S.W.3d at 115.


"That a statement is defamatorythat is, injurious to reputationdoes not mean that it is false, and vice versa." Bentley, 94 S.W.3d at 587. A defamatory statement must be sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved objectively true or false, as contrasted from a purely subjective assertion. See Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 21-22, 110 S. Ct. 2695, 2707, 111 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1990). Expressions of opinion may be derogatory and disparaging but nevertheless be protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and by article I, section 8 of the Texas Constitution. See Falk & Mayfield L.L.P. v. Molzan, 974 S.W.2d 821, 824 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet. denied); Yiamouyiannis v. Thompson, 764 S.W.2d 338, 340 (Tex. App.-San Antonio 1988, writ denied).


The determination of whether a publication is an actionable statement of fact or a constitutionally protected statement of opinion, like the determination whether a statement is false and defamatory, is a question of law. Bentley, 94 S.W.3d at 580; see also Turner, 38 S.W.3d at 114. And, like the determination whether a publication is false and defamatory, the determination whether a publication is an actionable statement of fact or a protected expression of opinion depends upon a reasonable person's perception of the entirety of the publication. Bentley, 94 S.W.3d at 579.

To distinguish between fact and opinion, the Texas Supreme Court has determined that we are to use Milkovich as our guide. Bentley, 94 S.W.3d at 579. In Milkovich, the United States Supreme Court refused to create an artificial dichotomy between opinion' and fact'. Id. at 579-80. Rather, it set out what it took to be existing constitutional doctrine of defamation liability. Id. The Texas Supreme Court extrapolated from Milkovich the following principles that apply in determining whether a statement is one of opinion or fact: (1) the statement must be provable as false, at least "where public-official or public-figure plaintiffs [are] involved"; (2) constitutional protection is afforded to "statements that cannot reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts'" in order to assure "that public debate will not suffer for lack of imaginative expression' or ... rhetorical hyperbole.'"; (3) "where a statement of opinion' on a matter of public concern reasonably implies false and defamatory facts regarding public figures or officials, those individuals must show that such statements were made with knowledge of their false implications or with reckless disregard of their truth"; or if the statement involves a private figure on a matter of public concern, the "plaintiff must show that the false connotations were made with some level of fault"; and (4) the statements must be given "enhanced appellate review" to assure that these determinations are made in a manner that does not "constitute a forbidden intrusion" into free speech. Bentley, 94 S.W.3d at 580.
Click to expand...

Oh, Funimation. Look what you made Godswill Ugwa put on your social media.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, REGENDarySumanai, Burnout and 2 others
FGO-Professor-P2PBTW said:
Does Nick have sources in Funimation as well?:optimistic:
Click to expand...

If you look at Funi's Glass Door reviews, yeah he's probably got a few sources in there. It is not a happy company. The grunts are treated like shit and ignored. The Management is Random and Broken. They haven't had an actual HR department in ages. You figure there are a few underlings that like Vic and loathe Rial and Marchi, there would almost have to be, just by observing how they treat people.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Exterminatus, damian, Kari Kamiya and 2 others
AnOminous said:
That written document was the product of someone slow in the mind. He couldn't follow the simplest instructions, left answers blank even though the instructions clearly stated to answer all questions, even if only to say you didn't know the answer.

He literally couldn't even fill out his own name. That is how fucking dumb this man is.

Soy apparently causes brain damage as well as shrinking your balls to the size of raisins.

I wouldn't trust this man to fill out a parking ticket much less a mortgage. The man is a pathetic, drooling moron.
Click to expand...

Nevermind the fact that Marchi never said that the “assault” happened on Funimation territory. She just said “her job”. How the fuck would Ron know where this happened?

Could this possibly hint at conspiracy between Marchi, Rial and La Choy?
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Feels
Reactions: XYZpdq, Army Burger and ColtWalker1847
Looks like the stream topics are mostly done. To sum up - The depths of Mr/Ms. Ronald's stupidity is greater than we could have ever known, and kickvic has, unsurprisingly, nothing to back themselves up.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Exterminatus
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back