Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

There was also some DM's from Marzgurl where she discussed who the next target from the list would be after Vic, or something to that effect. It was readily apparent that she and others had a list of "problematic: (by their standards) people that they wished to run this same routine on and drive out of the industry.
Apologies if already done, but I think this is important enough to add to the OP, Vic was just the start of their little witch hunt. @mindlessobserver
 
Apologies if already done, but I think this is important enough to add to the OP, Vic was just the start of their little witch hunt. @mindlessobserver
Well that I had no idea about. Any Screenshots of this or links? That smells like conspiracy right there(sorry if im late to this).

Edit:Also when did twitter let the wolf out of their kennel? I could have sworn they were banned.
 
718852


Aight, y'all, I get it. The campaign for the first 100 yang had far more publicity, both good and bad, than the relaunch with the new goal. Still, we gotta pick up the slack and get that number up.

Think of all the stupid shit you're gonna buy later this month. Are you going to buy a $10 movie ticket to watch computer-animated superheroes punch each other for 90 minutes even though you've seen that happen in fifteen other movies? Are you going to re-up your gym membership for $20 when you haven't actually been in that place since January? Are you going to blow $5-30 on a Steam game that's on sale even though you know you're never going to get through your backlog before your dying day as it is? You sorry mother fucker, give that money to Vic's campaign instead. Just think of the months of entertainment we've had from this, and the many more sure to come. Don't tell me you've got the leisure time to spare catching up on this thread's twenty fucking new pages a day but are too broke to help teach some Twitter cry-bullies what justice actually means, because if that's true, you need to get off your ass and get another job - and then donate some doucats to the campaign.

I want this thing funded up to 200 grand by the end of the month, or else y'all are pigfuckers, you hear me? Get on it.
 
Personally I wish @emspex would join in, because it would be that much more funny when the spergs realize that it was a woman who did the doxing. Than again it was funny when she helped @Null on a few streams a bit... specially AL laughing her ass off while josh had no idea what to say other than cyberbulling lol (not to mention deathfat)
I'm fine with talking to Nick anytime, but youtube chats always seem to hate me. Everytime I went on with Null it was just a deluge of KICK THE THOT lol
 
Personally I wish @emspex would join in, because it would be that much more funny when the spergs realize that it was a woman who did the doxing.

Not just a woman, but also a woman who is mostly ambivalent about Vic himself, doesn't want his D, but also doesn't like lynch mobs. She was great in the Tommy Tooter stream. She also has a adorable voice. I'm proud to be on a site she helps moderate.

Please consider it @emspex.

Timestamp set:


Aight, y'all, I get it. The campaign for the first $100 yang had far more publicity, both good and bad, than the relaunch with the new goal. Still, we gotta pick up the slack and get that number up.

I'm thinking this will pick up again once the suit is filed.
 
I'm fine with talking to Nick anytime, but youtube chats always seem to hate me. Everytime I went on with Null it was just a deluge of KICK THE THOT lol

Lol fuck that, I was absolutely dieing on the Amber-Lynn stream. Chantal was pretty good too.

edit:


If anyone has a few hours to burn. This is all kinds of fantastic.
 
I'm fine with talking to Nick anytime, but youtube chats always seem to hate me. Everytime I went on with Null it was just a deluge of KICK THE THOT lol
Well, Null's streams get a lot of crossover with the IBS youtube crowd, and a lot of them don't actually use Kiwi Farms, and you can tell a lot of them aren't actually meming. Just my two cents though, I think it's funny either way.

I notice Nick's audience is a bit different. I base that on the fact that Lady Rackets and the ALOD have both been well received.
 
View attachment 718852

Aight, y'all, I get it. The campaign for the first 100 yang had far more publicity, both good and bad, than the relaunch with the new goal. Still, we gotta pick up the slack and get that number up.

Think of all the stupid shit you're gonna buy later this month. Are you going to buy a $10 movie ticket to watch computer-animated superheroes punch each other for 90 minutes even though you've seen that happen in fifteen other movies? Are you going to re-up your gym membership for $20 when you haven't actually been in that place since January? Are you going to blow $5-30 on a Steam game that's on sale even though you know you're never going to get through your backlog before your dying day as it is? You sorry mother fucker, give that money to Vic's campaign instead. Just think of the months of entertainment we've had from this, and the many more sure to come. Don't tell me you've got the leisure time to spare catching up on this thread's twenty fucking new pages a day but are too broke to help teach some Twitter cry-bullies what justice actually means, because if that's true, you need to get off your ass and get another job - and then donate some doucats to the campaign.

I want this thing funded up to 200 grand by the end of the month, or else y'all are pigfuckers, you hear me? Get on it.

Look, I've doubled my donation from last time. I've done my part.
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy

But that's just it. absolutely none of the reports or claims regarding Vic seemingly involve "Sex". In nothing we have seen is there any sexual contact. The absolute worst one was a possible sexual advance (a kiss) in his hotel room, that ended the moment the woman said no. It's all "he pulled my hair while we were in front of everybody on stage".

Don't forget the "whispering something sexual" in their ears. Saying something sexual to someone, though, isn't assault. Nor is it harassment. According to the EEOC (and this is based off of a reference on Wikipedia to the EEOC website, sexual harassment consists of

"unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature . . . when this conduct explicitly or implicitly affects an individual's employment, unreasonably interferes with an individual's work performance, or creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment.”

So, did any of these "advances" affect their work environment and fuck over their employment? Apparently not. They're doing just fucking fine after the supposed "assault".

If I joked about requesting a woman to take off her top (which I've done a couple of times to different women in open spaces), is that sexual harassment? If sex is brought up in a discussion, is that sexual harassment now? If that is, then fuck me, we're in a world of shit. Throw me in prison, dammit.

Also, harassment implies that a certain activity is done over and over again to a certain person within a short period of time. If I poked someone over and over again without their consent, that's harassment. If I keep yelling at someone while following them in a short period of time, that's harassment. But is pulling different people's hair weeks to months apart from each other is harassment? That's just seems like seeing if either different people are comfortable with it, or if it is being done to the same person weeks apart from each other, where they more than likely are in a different mood or circumstance than the previous period.

All women are not the same. The fucking blue-haired orca or the fat slob called MarzGurl are nowhere near as athletic or content as a woman like Jiang Luxia, or even as smart and savvy like Judy Sheindlin. That's something these banshees don't get, but they say "sexual assault", "sexual harassment", "assault" and "harassment" like they know what the words and terms mean and that they are experts on the subject when they really aren't, and then they stretch definitions of these terms to fit them into their world view and weaponize it eventually. They throw it around and people are too gullible to just accept it.

Because if the things I've done in the past involving sexual conversation constitute sexual harassment, and criticizing someone or asking them questions without their refusal constitutes "harassment", then society's in trouble.
 
Last edited:
Back