Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Can't women do that too?
The difference is that when men do it, it's somehow a deliberate display of male dominance. This kinda stuff isn't new, and they'll get just as mad as someone in a near empty subway car doing it as they will someone in a crowded space. The crowded space bit is just so logical people think there is a proper reason for it (not taking up extra room) and not seeing it as just whining about nothing at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: José Mourinho
:story:

BWeVV0k.png
 
I'm female and have always had a tendency to sit like that. Guess I have enough oppression points to where I can do it as much as I want with them getting buttmad though :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: José Mourinho
I wonder what SJDs would think of French and German. Both languages don't just have gendered pronouns: they have genders for things like fucking bridges! (The French think them more feminine, while Germans, more masculine)
Slavic languages, such as Polish, Russian, Czech and so on are even better in this respect. Even verbs have to be changed in a sentence in order to be grammatically correct when using past or future tense. For example "He was doing/she was doing/it was doing/they (males) were doing/they (females) were doing" becomes in Polish "On robił/ona robiła/ono robiło/oni robili/one robiły". Now imagine what would happen if there were even more pronouns; this language would become a fucking mess, and I'm pretty sure it would be impossible from linguistic point of view, as those constructions are based on adding vowels to the end of the words, and only "u" remains unused.

Oh, and all nouns are also either masculine, feminine or "nijaki" (bland).

Bottom line: seems that SJWs don't comprehend that some languages just cannot possibly accomodate for new pronouns just because the special snowflakes feel so special.
 

As a Torontonian I have no problem with this. Other than the fact that it doesn't go far enough.

Tack in assholes who go to one of those little... Ah fuck how to explain it.... Rows of 2-seat sets, sit on the outer one, and refuse to move in or stand up so that somebody can sit in the other one.

I've seen cases where people explicitly ask to get through and the people just pretend they don't hear them.

It's a crowded transit system and we have far too many assholes in it.

Congrats Toronto: you've gone full ADF!

tumblr_n6apbpu1vR1tns5dmo2_500.jpg


Yeah. I don't like this omic.

"We have to be small for them?!"

Says who?

This is something I don't like in their worldview. This attitude of helplessness. "Oh, oh we have to do this! Simply have to!"

The fuck is stopping you from doing the opposite?

True, I sometimes seem these comics/rants where guys are giving them dirty looks, but here's the thing...

How do you think guys treat other guys who behave that way? If I sit down and the guy next to me spreads his legs way out pushing me to the side, you think we're going to exchange smiles, wink at each other, and go "Wayda patriarchy, bro."

No. I'm going to mutter asshole under my breath and glare at him, or push back.

You don't want to be small, don't be small. Is the guy sitting next to you holding a gun to your head saying "You best not spread your legs out" or something?

I see lots of "be rough and tough" sort of material from some of my Feminist friends. What I really like though, is seeing girls act on it. If you find this mentality that you have to be a wallflower disagreeable, act against it.

EDIT - Also. I-Is that the Law for Kids PSA comic style? I.... I want to edit this to be followed by a picture of a Cis male and one of those girls sitting at the desk of a principal saying "You are both suspended."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah. I don't like this omic.


EDIT - Also. I-Is that the Law for Kids PSA comic style? I.... I want to edit this to be followed by a picture of a Cis male and one of those girls sitting at the desk of a principal saying "You are both suspended."
It's the work of ADF, who was a social justice warrior before it was "cool".
You can read about his adventures as a commie anarchist feminist quasi-transsexual moron here: http://cwckiforums.com/threads/ahuviya-harel.681/
 
Using a reaction image from a cartoon to express an opinion on a social issue? Would have never expected that.

It's just the whole sex-positive vs. sex-negative thing that they've got going on. Some actually think that by some women being so open sexually, they're devaluing women by taking away their power or something, the way that they control men. Of course that's sex-negative stuff, sex-positive is weird. Really, this whole shit is rather strange.
 
Back