Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
So near the beginning of this. Jame Marchi #metoo'd Vic. While doing so she decided to show malice which even you yourself should be able to admit. She later had pm's leaked showing that she had 0 evidence, knew she was past the statue of limitation. Despite these things which basically show that she walked in to a situation where she knew she could get completely dunked on in court by someone several chromosomes short of a regular set decided to wage a social war. One you have assisted in. Why?
 
First off, get a bigger crate you monster, a GSD grows fast.

Because people enjoy it and I like the challenges. I have a new one that is literally community run. A bunch of people including guests, attendees, vendors, and staffers and whenever we have a question we bring it to a general chat and say what do you want to do and whoever is online answers and we do it. No matter how crazy we try because it is a challenge.

With bigger shows, there are a million pieces to it. There is always a puzzle and challenge to pull it off. I do it for being able to do it.
Yeah I looked at your convention. Granted, I'm not a staffer, I've done media-y things and artist alley slinging but have friends in high con places and have a basic gist of con mechanics through them.

Your con looks like trash. No explanation what it is, shitty gimmick that isn't explained, ugly logo made up of default Photoshop shapes, fonts, and layer effects (lol stroke + drop shadow graphicdesignismypassion.jpeg,) literally who guests, and tickets for a whole weekend that cost less than a movie ticket. Add on an oversaturated market and shitty social media presence, your con looks like a high school weeb project and not a professional outlet.
 
For some people yes. If you ever are in a position to make a decision about something or influence something then yes I think you put your name and face behind it or shut the hell up.

Now do Renfamous, Dominque Skye, Rial, Sabat, and again, PULL.


So near the beginning of this. Jame Marchi #metoo'd Vic. While doing so she decided to show malice which even you yourself should be able to admit. She later had pm's leaked showing that she had 0 evidence, knew she was past the statue of limitation. Despite these things which basically show that she walked in to a situation where she knew she could get completely dunked on in court by someone several chromosomes short of a regular set decided to wage a social war. One you have assisted in. Why?

Yes, why?

More importantly, what's your actual stance when "the people putting their faces" behind baseless accusations flagrantly lie to the public, then shuffle out of the limelight to have you hold the shit?

Because that's what's going to get you in the end: defending someone else's behavior/statements that they won't defend themselves because they know how wrong it is.
 
Do you think that the kickvic side in general is aware of the extent to which we'd savage Vic if we found evidence that the accusations are true?

I can't tell you how many times I have been shown something and wanted to immediately post it online or screenshot a conversation and post it online. If I could, I doubt any of this would be happening.
For the record, with at least some of them, it pisses me off they are cowards who hide behind profits knowing other people are taking the hits for the shit they refuse to talk about.
 
Hey, we agree with you man.
We’re still trying to get RaisedbyWolves to show themselves.

YUeah so
Wait, if you weren't okay with the idea and thought it was creepy then why did you still date and later marry her?

We are best friends and after talking to other friends of hers, her mom and dad, and others who have known her for years I stopped holding her being in her 20's against her.
 
I can't tell you how many times I have been shown something and wanted to immediately post it online or screenshot a conversation and post it online. If I could, I doubt any of this would be happening.
For the record, with at least some of them, it pisses me off they are cowards who hide behind profits knowing other people are taking the hits for the shit they refuse to talk about.

That doesn’t seem to hold up. What exactly would happen if you showed evidence that proved you all were right all along?

Unless of course it proves some of the parties denouncing Vic now were covering for him or something similar. Care to explain further?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: RodgerDodger
I can't tell you how many times I have been shown something and wanted to immediately post it online or screenshot a conversation and post it online. If I could, I doubt any of this would be happening.
For the record, with at least some of them, it pisses me off they are cowards who hide behind profits knowing other people are taking the hits for the shit they refuse to talk about.
So what’s stopping you from posting them?
 
I can't tell you how many times I have been shown something and wanted to immediately post it online or screenshot a conversation and post it online. If I could, I doubt any of this would be happening.
For the record, with at least some of them, it pisses me off they are cowards who hide behind profits knowing other people are taking the hits for the shit they refuse to talk about.
then post it and burn the industry. it's rotten as is. better to reboot it and start the cycle anew.
 
I can't tell you how many times I have been shown something and wanted to immediately post it online or screenshot a conversation and post it online. If I could, I doubt any of this would be happening.
For the record, with at least some of them, it pisses me off they are cowards who hide behind profits knowing other people are taking the hits for the shit they refuse to talk about.
Just post it then you utter cretin, you've been singing this tune for fucking weeks now and on Monday shit hits the fan in a very real way for people and you're still just sitting there asking people to believe you when all you do is deflect and lie.
 
I can't tell you how many times I have been shown something and wanted to immediately post it online or screenshot a conversation and post it online. If I could, I doubt any of this would be happening.
For the record, with at least some of them, it pisses me off they are cowards who hide behind profits knowing other people are taking the hits for the shit they refuse to talk about.

Fair enough. You might have noticed that one question we keep coming back to is "why now"?

Leaving Vic aside, both sides seem to agree that the industry is full of predators and that it's been sheltering them for years. Can you give us any insight into why they've been sheltered for so long beyond people putting their own economic interests before doing the right thing? It creates something of a credibility gap when people claim to have known about this stuff for a very long time but have not acted to stop it. What kind of person does that?
 
Back