- Joined
- Jan 28, 2019
Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.
- Thread starter Himedall All-seeing Waifu
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2017
Nick is pushing the limits on what an activate courtroom-oriented lawyer should be doing/saying on YouTube. His YouTube activities don't actually need to be unethical in a disciplinary sense for it to be a bad idea for his law career. It was really a matter of time until something from his YouTube career manifested itself in the legal realm.
I would never hire a lawyer with a YouTube channel, especially Nick.
I would never hire a lawyer with a YouTube channel, especially Nick.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2017
Depends on his clientele. Lawyers like Jack Thompson and Michael Avenatti were out there in the public saying way worse shit before they ended up disbarred/imprisoned. It's not like Nick is Vic's lawyer, unlike how Jack Thompson would always sperg out in the media about GTA while representing victims of some school shooting in some suit against Rockstar.
I don't see that as a minus. In fact, as far as Nick's clients goes, they won't necessarily care if he has a youtube channel or not.
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2017
Depends on the case. Just look how many eyes he put on #KickVic. To anyone who legitimately thinks that's a bad thing: HELLO P.U.L.L. USER, please enjoy your visit!
BradolfPittler
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2016
You could also argue the opposite. Hes very respectful toward anonymity, and has presented a lot of legal know-how. Still, I could see how hos youtube activity could be off-putting toward potential clients
Tard
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2016
It seems like alot of people who hire him don't seem to really use the internet much so I doubt they care about his antics on here. People think the internet is huge but you would be surprised how many people don't use it, my siblings seem to keep their social media to a absolute minimum and they are 17-25 (the most I've seen from them is one of them watches PewDiePie but that's it really)
He also usually prefers writing wills anyways so it's not like anyone's going to care that much about what the lawyer writing his will says online.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2019
why would you not hire a lawyer you know is both competent but can spit legal fire consistently? thats... rofl
banter is a lawyers greatest skill
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2019
I think you are legally r.etarded
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2019
how? being able to argue is the main part of their job, dipshit
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2015
You're absolutely right, the only thing is that I don't think Nick is interested in being a lawyer in the traditional sense anymore. He'd rather be an internet pundit with a legal degree and skills who does occasional legal work on the side. It's certainly lucrative - more lucrative than being a small-town lawyer? Who knows.
Jub-Jub
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2018
I get where you are coming from, i can respect that opinion and he may have to tone it down as his channel grows, BUT.
Here's why i would hire Nick: He has shown an absolute tenacity to dig into cases and their background case law in jurisdictions that he can't practice in, to give a great overview of the issues. Other lawyers from those jurisdictions have praised and shown surprise at his work and understanding of the local law. He can be considered cheap, while readily admitting his faults and will turn down those who he feels are outside his expertise. He is slowly building a network of good lawyers all over the US that he can and will recommend. He can decipher and explain law including citations off the top of his head while drunk and convert that to Layman's terms. While drunk he shows the ability to obliterate other lawyers arguments (based on law) and run a successful PR front in which he can deride others as incompetent jokes. If you look into his YouTube history and predictions, he appears to have premonition as most things appear to go as he predicts.
For my closing argument I'll present the following; LanDUI isn't a YouTube lawyer, Rekieta is a YouTube lawyer. Who do you choose to defend you?
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 22, 2016
Tim Pool talks Subverse, Studio FOW, and Trademarks
Tim Pool can be found at: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCe02lGcO-ahAURWuxAJnjdA https://www.youtube.com/user/Timcasts https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLM...
www.youtube.com
Tim Pool stream is tonight at 8PM Central
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I'd hire Nick for anything local to him, or at least get a reference from him, and I'd definitely hire Leonard French for anything in his wheelhouse.
Stab You in the Back
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2018
He's going to turn some people away, but he's also going to attract others. Its like all those bad lawyer commercials you see on youtube. You might think those lawyers have no credibility, but I guarantee you there's some schlub watching The Price Is Right thinking to himself, "I should hire these guys, they look smart."
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2018
I never heard of this guy before, or the porn studio on the other side, but I'm really stunned by the people saying that he must just give up the brand he's been building for half a decade just because some porn company is coming out with a new product of the same name. At this point in the product's development, it really should be very little sweat off the studio's back to just change the name of their product just enough to avoid confusion.
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2019
It's typical for current year. Everything is polarizing to extremes and the opposition must be obliterated. Look at any time recently a cover song is released, the fans of the covering band declare it the best ever and will attempt to BTFO anyone who disagrees. Some go so far as to suggest that the original artists should pay the covering band for exposure a la social media influencers.
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2019
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2018
He started tonight's scheduled stream early, presumably to finish off the superberries from his earlier stream before getting back on the Meyer v Waid stuff.
www.youtube.com
Finishing up Meyer v Waid. Finishing Chats from Tim Pool
JUSTICE CHAT: https://streamlabs.com/rekietalaw MERCH: https://teespring.com/stores/rekieta-law Finishing up the Meyer v. Waid documents and finishing the Ch...
www.youtube.com