Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

It's right in the Constitution dude. Seventh Amendment.

"In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."

In hindsite they probably should have indexed that one for inflation
 
Not really. Shannon can be a dude's name, just like Ashley. It's just most people in the present associate it as a female name.

Welcome to the wonderful world of etymology in Current Year.

Assume gender based on name, or mispronounciate that name, and you're a bigot racist.
In Texas you can. Can have 6 to 12 in a jury. Apparently it is not really worth it though.

My current state and most states have similar rules.

The way Georgia does it is making people come in for jury selection as they then whittle down they selection pool by making them sit and listen to the facts of the case.

Most people drop out like fucking flies, citing religious and persona experience with the case material;

And even if you have 0 problems with wanting to be present to be there, they can still remove you from the jury pool
or pass over you should they want the jury to have a specific selection.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Genkoda
Not gonna happen today guys... tomorrow... Ty will be on tonight to explain.

727090
 
It's right in the Constitution dude. Seventh Amendment.

"In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law."
Kinda sucks that the founding fathers didn't foresee Fiat money. Probably should be above 20k nowadays
 
In state court, it varies because the Seventh Amendment isn't incorporated upon the states (see Slaugherhouse bullshit), but most states I'm aware of have state constitutional requirements similar to the 7th.
RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY.
The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate. The Legislature shall pass such laws as may be needed to regulate the same, and to maintain its purity and efficiency. Provided, that the Legislature may provide for the temporary commitment, for observation and/or treatment, of mentally ill persons not charged with a criminal offense, for a period of time not to exceed ninety (90) days, by order of the County Court without the necessity of a trial by jury.

- Texas Constitution Article I Bill of Rights, Section 15

TRIAL BY JURY IN CIVIL CASES.
In the trial of all causes in the District Courts, the plaintiff or defendant shall, upon application made in open court, have the right of trial by jury; but no jury shall be empaneled in any civil case unless demanded by a party to the case, and a jury fee be paid by the party demanding a jury, for such sum, and with such exceptions as may be prescribed by the Legislature.

- Texas Constitution Article V, Section 10
 
Wonder if the 401st statement needs to get added.
Well, Kickvic is going to be insufferable today then. RIP.
Really curious on what happened though, tonight's stream will be interesting.

I can't tell you what it is just yet, but they discovered something super juicy they need to add in, and had to authenticate it.

I knew about this 2 hours ago, but Nick told me to keep my yap shut.

Be sure to watch tonight. He says it will be discussed.
 
I can't tell you what it is just yet, but they discovered something super juicy they need to add in, and had to authenticate it.

I knew about this 2 hours ago, but Nick told me to keep my yap shut.

Be sure to watch tonight. He says it will be discussed.

Well, now, that sounds like excellent news. My hype level not only came back, but rose above what it was before. Thanks for the info cap.
 
Decided to check on PULL to see how they were coping and they were surprisingly optimistic:

View attachment 725543
They may have taken Toye's legal advice to heart too much.
Niggerberries27 how are you this fucking dumb? IT'S THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU WROTE! It's innocent until proven guilty, you gulag loving commie. He's innocent by default, Vic doesn't have to prove his innocence, they have to prove Vic is guilty of whatever he's accused of!

That is clearly my post this guy/girl/whatever the fuck is screenshotting.

I like how these idiots skip posts that show references that answer the very questions they're asking. I've been posting the Texas Press link to "Defense by Truth" a while back, and they still can't get it through their thick fucking skulls.

https://www.texaspress.com/law-a-the-media-in-texas-libel-defenses-01
Not gonna happen today guys... tomorrow... Ty will be on tonight to explain.

View attachment 727090

Goddamnit. Nick's been blueballing us just to have the lawsuit filing delayed.
 
Last edited:
You can find a slightly more accurate appeal structure here, in my earlier reply.

I'll even go into critical and painful detail.



As the market place continues to further devalue sex because of how badly certain women will degrade themselves to get sexual attention through being eThots for show, guys have become further desensitized.

These thots are too much a coward to go all the way and strip nude, and they're too much a prude/self-respecting on some level to out-and-out get their box pounded for porn as Streamer thots/Beauty Youtubers Celestia Vega and LenaThePlug — and that's not even an achievement by all counts, because their sex tapes and scenes are fucking boring.

Now as this wave of Thottery Barn protection becomes more and more tantalizing for regular women to do just to get a little more attention, the ones who've weaponized it into the paypig structure benefit greatly for doing nothing but the absolute bare minimum requirements, while the regular women are getting diminished returns;

The end result is multiple trains of rationalizing thought co-existing due to risk aversion and effort/cost analysis:

"If I can just pick up loose sluts on Tinder, OkCupid, and even from hook-ups from conventions, why would I invest into someone?"
"If all these thots have to offer is a shitty picture set behind a $40 paywall that got leaked to the internet anyways, why wouldn't I just watch real hardcore porn over their snapchat leaks and sex tapes that have all the charisma of bar soap?"
"Why risk rejection and being embarrassed in public with girls when they'll just accuse me of rape for even daring to talk to them, let alone compliment them on what they're wearing? I can just look at twitch thot from in chat."
No matter who you are, especially if you're just a regular guy or girl, the only ones who win in this equation is the thots — because there will always be a defeatist paypig who doesn't think he's good enough for anyone who'll always take the cuck's way out and hand over his money and loyalty for the shame of watching a 7~10 hour stream schedule, just to hope for an (((intentional))) wardrobe malfunction.

The devaluing of sex could potentially theoretically benefit both sexes.

For Men: it's the obvious, women having less control and less leverage increases every mans power in the dating world. I've read articles where women complain that men don't take them on dates anymore it's all about netflix and chill. But as any guy probably knows, you're expected to shell out the money for the fancy dinner she wants to have and if she friendzones you after costing you $100 oh well, try again next time. So the easier it is to get sexual gratification, the less power a manipulative woman, greedy gold digger or a woman whose personality is drying paint has in dating.

For Women: theoretically speaking, for the women out there who have more to offer than looks and sex but are otherwise prudish. They can more easily find patient men since they can easily get sexual gratification elsewhere then go on dates to make a connection, as opposed to needing to pretend to care to get your dick wet. (Now only guys who actually care would bother going on the date at all, It's not worth the effort to fake it)
 
There was this one time driving through Chicago that it was impossible to get off the highway when I had to go real bad. No cup, but I had an empty soda bottle... To this day, the family joke is "make a Chicago bottle if you need to".
Also known as "trucker lemonade".
Not gonna happen today guys... tomorrow... Ty will be on tonight to explain.

View attachment 727090
I hope it's because they're going to use Soye's ongoing defamation even after he got the demand for retraction as evidence of why a TRO should be granted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Noticed a handful of new accounts in this thread, be aware that they could be plants/socks used to claim ty/vic are commanding harassers.

I did a quick look and everything seemed kosher, but now that papers are papering who knows what gay ops might spring forth
Anyone that comes here to try to do gay ops will just be rated Dumb or Islamic content and ignored though.
I can't tell you what it is just yet, but they discovered something super juicy they need to add in, and had to authenticate it.

I knew about this 2 hours ago, but Nick told me to keep my yap shut.

Be sure to watch tonight. He says it will be discussed.
Bitchin' ? as long as it's worth the wait my justice boner will be ready.
 
Back