- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
The only meaning of his post is that obviously Nick knows what he's doing as a lawyer, and so does Beard.
The actual reason for preferring Texas other than that the common nucleus of factual events that comprise the various cases are predominantly in Texas is that the actual state law itself, including statutes and precedents, is more favorable for a tortious interference claim there than possibly anywhere else in the United States.
That the judge, even a federal judge, of the Eastern District might wear a ten gallon hat and a pair of six shooters on his belt into court is just a cherry on the sundae.
