Shane Holmberg / Shane Presley Holmberg - The Containment Cell for The Breaker of Chairs, Eater of Shoes, Groomer of His Child Bride

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
What exactly is shoe-chewer trying to make a point of?

The only meaning of his post is that obviously Nick knows what he's doing as a lawyer, and so does Beard.

The actual reason for preferring Texas other than that the common nucleus of factual events that comprise the various cases are predominantly in Texas is that the actual state law itself, including statutes and precedents, is more favorable for a tortious interference claim there than possibly anywhere else in the United States.

That the judge, even a federal judge, of the Eastern District might wear a ten gallon hat and a pair of six shooters on his belt into court is just a cherry on the sundae.
 
726997

 
View attachment 726586

Shane's losing it (not that he ever had it to begin with, but still...)

I like how he ignores the civil conspiracy involved in all those journalists sourcing each other and most of them being friends with each other, and therefore ignores the fact that any cons who may have banned him (13 of hundreds to thousands) could also be lied to by that same conspiracy, or staffed by/have connections to that conspiracy.

You know, because he's pretending said conspiracy isn't blatantly obvious.

this guy... unironically reads polygon as a factual news source.... of course. because we no longer live in a world of rational thought, we live in a world of human-shaped baboons.

Who is he referring to? What law firm? The one Ron isn't listening to, or the one that Funimation has which hasn't removed or clarified the tweet that's gotten them into their mess?


Japan Times literally just quoted ANN and io9, why would you read that instead of those? It reminds me of that guy who sourced an article about his own yahoo answers question to make it seem like his case had legitimacy.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Le Pew and Unog
View attachment 727042

It doesn't matter how good the other side's lawyers may be, if their client keeps acting like a moron, their capability to get a good result is limited.

That would be the law firm that Toye apparently had one consult with, and ignored any advise from after 48 hours had past? That one? The one that’s about to get 20lbs of individual causes of action, half of which were committed after their client engaged them? The ones that are likely only just now seeing their clients fraudulent battery of Bar complaints? That “best in nation” law firm? He’ll be lucky if they don’t kick his ass to the curb by Tuesday to preserve their reputation.
 
View attachment 727042

It doesn't matter how good the other side's lawyers may be, if their client keeps acting like a moron, their capability to get a good result is limited.
Groomer: why didn't you believe me?? their voted number one for years!!!
Judge: Groomer evidence of lawyer rankings. smh
Groomer: but their number one so their more credible then Ty
Judge: are you in an echo chamber here?
Groomer: But credibility matters in a court of law!!! I bet you are just ignoring their credibility.
Judge: it's YOUR credibility, not the lawyers that matter
Groomer: Nuh-uh, if I wasn't credible then why would they take me?
Judge: Money -.-
Groomer: so you are stating money over credibility? isn't that a bribe? did Vic bribe you? is that an admittance to bribery of a judge?
Judge: Groomer, you are found guilty of X, X, and X crime, and sentence to life in prison for accusing a judge faultily for taking a bribe.
 

Get a load of this guy. This pinhead thinks a good law firm would tell you not to settle a lawsuit where you're obviously going to get clobbered? That's the opposite of what a good or even competent law firm would do.
 
View attachment 727126

Nick owns Shane, part 66

Boasting about how your child bride you knew since she was underage gives good head and has had a traumatic life that you apparently took advantage of to get with her looks to me like ongoing abusive behavior. Who wants to be called a cocksucker in public by her own husband?
 
Back