Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

I've noticed a lot of users in the threads I frequent are still gossiping about this faggot as if he's someone noteworthy. I suspect it is because of the mystery of his banning. The truth is actually quite mundane.

AJiZyM4.png


To put it simply: Someone universally reviled by this website directly annoyed the man who owns this website. I hope this sates everyone's curiosity.
It's take effort to be that despised. That's impressive
 
As we wait for an update on any possible litigation I'd like to give a PSA to everyone.

Today is the home media release of Dragon Ball Super: Broly. Now if for some reason you were still thinking of picking this up to day despite what Funimation has done to Vic, I'd like to attempt to change your mind.

In addition to misleading advertising "45 minutes" of extras, these are just footage of interviews conducted by Funimation themselves. One special feature titled, "Vic Mignogna Answers Your Questions” has been reportedly removed.

But most importantly, Funimation's release has this awful green tint over the footage.

View attachment 729049

View attachment 729050

No other source has this. Do not support this release. Not because Funimation has screwed over Vic but because it's an inferior product.
I saw the film at Wal-Mart yesterday in EST. Also, I hope ResetEra gets dragged into this mess. I'm also putting my chips on Adam Sheehan being the lackey.
 
Man... and I like TvTropes too... why does every thing I love have to become exceptional.

Sorry to bust your bubble man, but TV Tropes has been pants on head exceptional for awhile, and I say this as someone that uses TV Tropes and is a registered user there. We have an entire thread dedicated to the site and its community: Tv Tropes Community
 
We've been through this multiple times. I myself brought up a crucial point about this pages and pages ago.

Maybe you should like... I dunno... read the thread you're in, bruh?

1. They've consistently held themselves out as nothing other than engaged.

2. It doesn't fucking matter that Texas has common law marriage, because spousal privilege in Texas is specifically NOT RETROACTIVE. It's not gonna save Ron if he's forced to testify about the gay ops Monica has run to date.
Ok this was settled 4 pages ago, the main jest is that common law marriage is so easy to invoke in Texas and they're so stupid that there's a possibility they're gonna try to declare common law marriage and attempt to illegally backdate it.

I am very well aware it's not retroactive (I have never suggested it could be retroactive only that they could try to unlawfully backdate it) but the burden of proof for common law marriage is so low and they are so stupid and self destructive I could see them wilfully committing perjury to attempt and invoke it especially by intentionally deleting tweets and then presenting the posts and videos mistakenly referring to them as married as 'proof' they were representing themselves as married.

I am sorry for failing to clarify and accentuate that point earlier.
 
Last edited:
Today at PULL's law division: All their info is inadmissible in trial anyway!
View attachment 729057
If they are actually right I'll take my dumb ratings like a champ
It still goes through, that poor sap would probably just get fired and there might be some damage claims depending on the contract. That said, they didn't break any NDA, because Ty and Nick are actually competent
 
I'll eat my patch if this is the case.
I mean Nick and Ty have proven to be competent enough where if that was actually the case, then they would acknowledge it and work with that fact. Nick would have picked up on it immediately and said something about it if that was really stopping anyone from doing anything going forward. I'll leave it at their discretion since they are the ones with degrees and I'm just a dopey cunt.
 
Dragging ResetERA and PULL into this mess would be lulzy, but I don't think it'll happen because they have the same Section 230 protection that we have (which... on balance... is a good thing). They'd have to subpoena the site admins for the dox on every idiot that is talking shit in the forms, and then sue them as individuals. Nobody can really go after the sites themselves, because they aren't legally treated as publishers.

I don't see it happening. That's too much work and money.

Ok this was settled 4 pages ago, the main jest is that common law marriage is so easy to invoke in Texas and they're so stupid that there's a possibility they're gonna try to declare common law marriage and attempt to illegally backdate it.

Nigga, it was settled back on page 776! The point is, this was already looked at and dismissed.

Your initial post was "you guys have to be careful" because Texas recognizes common law marriage. It's irrelevant. Even if they change their story to "we're married!" right now, it's not gonna save them, because they pulled all their gay bullshit months ago (and are still pulling it).

Let them try claiming they've been married this whole time, despite the extensive archives we have that show them holding themselves out as engaged. It won't work. There's absolutely no cause for us to be careful. Ron is the one that should probably be careful.

I'm sorry. I'm just tired of going around and around in circles on some of these issues.
 
It still goes through, that poor sap would probably just get fired and there might be some damage claims depending on the contract. That said, they didn't break any NDA, because Ty and Nick are actually competent

Why would Vic sign an NDA for anything related to a fig leaf investigation to fake up a reason to fire him? Anyone sensible would tell them to get bent and go straight to their own lawyer who would tell them the same.
 
I'll eat my patch if this is the case.
There is not an NDA short of one involving National Security, that a regular court can't bypass. And even then the USSC can invalidate those. Nick and Ty cannot 'violate an NDA' unless they signed one covering them personally. If someone under an NDA spills their guts, thats THIER violation of their NDA.
 
Why would Vic sign an NDA for anything related to a fig leaf investigation to fake up a reason to fire him? Anyone sensible would tell them to get bent and go straight to their own lawyer who would tell them the same.
PULL is desperately reaching for anything to stick on Nick and Ty. They need to just accept that even if Vic did do some skeevy shit, they backed a couple of dumbasses who will never be able to back those claims up
 
Today at PULL's law division: All their info is inadmissible in trial anyway!
View attachment 729057
If they are actually right I'll take my dumb ratings like a champ

I can't in good confidence believe that a company that currently has no functioning HR department and was stupid enough to not only NOT take advantage of the fact that they're situated in an at-will state, but also decided to make a clearly defamatory statement that they'll be absolutely hanged for come trial, actually thought ahead of time to have everyone involved sign an NDA.

Not that they're right, anyways. The io9 article already reported the investigation as inconclusive-- how would they have known about that without being made privy to any part of the investigation findings?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Burnout
Dragging ResetERA and PULL into this mess would be lulzy, but I don't think it'll happen because they have the same Section 230 protection that we have (which... on balance... is a good thing). They'd have to subpoena the site admins for the dox on every idiot that is talking shit in the forms, and then sue them as individuals. Nobody can really go after the sites themselves, because they aren't legally treated as publishers.

I don't see it happening. That's too much work and money.



Nigga, it was settled back on page 776! The point is, this was already looked at and dismissed.

Your initial post was "you guys have to be careful" because Texas recognizes common law marriage. It's irrelevant. Even if they change their story to "we're married!" right now, it's not gonna save them, because they pulled all their gay bullshit months ago (and are still pulling it).

Let them try claiming they've been married this whole time, despite the extensive archives we have that show them holding themselves out as engaged. It won't work. There's absolutely no cause for us to be careful. Ron is the one that should probably be careful.

I'm sorry. I'm just tired of going around and around in circles on some of these issues.
I know that feeling because this thread is so unwieldy yet despite getting an entire subforum dedicated to it nobody wants to make use of that to spin these topics off into their own threads
 
Today at PULL's law division: All their info is inadmissible in trial anyway!
View attachment 729057
If they are actually right I'll take my dumb ratings like a champ

And even if there was an NDA an NDA does not prevent information being probative if it is evidence of a crime or legal dispute. The leaker could in theory be sued or fired for leaking the info and thus breaking the NDA, but vic is not obligated to follow it
 
reasonable people tweeting at nobodies on twitter to "own" the "other side"
attention addicts thrusting themselves into the situation
promises of lawsuits that haven't come to fruition (yet)

so we really are just doing gamergate again huh
not really theres no gunt and this time competent lawyers are first parties instead of an irish man with lung cancer and a bunch of irl streamers
 
Speaking of stuff we've been going around and around on...

BREAKING NEWS!

Per Nick:

ALL Round 1 lawsuits will be filed in TEXAS STATE COURT.

ALL Round 1 defendants are Texas residents or Texas business entities.

Vic legally relocated to back to Texas shortly before this happened. The plaintiff is therefore also a Texas resident.

So, we can put that to bed. There will be NOTHING ON PACER.

Note that this only applies to Round 1. Things become a bit more complicated from there, obviously.

I know that feeling because this thread is so unwieldy yet despite getting an entire subforum dedicated to it nobody wants to make use of that to spin these topics off into their own threads

I agree with you on doing that for certain things, but you also don't want to balkanize this too much. When the suit drops, it'll get a thread in Lolcow & Lolcow LLP., so that should help sort out the purely legal stuff.

And I'm sorry if I came off too strong, its just that some of this is getting irritating.
 
Last edited:
Back