- Joined
- Feb 5, 2018
Sea Salt Mine - here there be chimping over the lawsuit
- Thread starter damian
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2019
Agreed, and while it is technically a legal document, I'd cut someone slack while filing an ethics complaint if they're not accustomed to formal writing.
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
Lol, if you are the target of baseless accusations of sexual misconduct, you are no true Christian. Glad we have people who would have most likely been stoned or burnt by ancient Christians lecturing us on how Jesus was a #metoo advocate.
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2019
Also gotta love "I hope and pray if there is a God...". You either believe there is one or you don't. As you obviously don't, quit appropriating muh religion!
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
Let me pray to the Christian God as I attempt to destroy a Christian's life because an atheist celebrity made up rumors about him.
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
It's like we know that we will all be a target of bullshit if we let bullshit against others go unanswered.
ShortRound
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2019
Yes im Bulma no I'm not. It doesnt really matter if I agree im trolling if i disagree everything thinks I'm trolling. I can't win. So I'll take the title and sell to anyone. I was going to make a promonica patch for my store and look at the metrics to compareI guess you guys don't know about @ShortRound The Weapons Merchant of WeebWars.
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2018
Another read of that tweet is "What I don't understand is why those people were putting themselves in harms way for someone they don't know."
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2019
She lost the right to call herself his friend when she made a malicious false accusation against him. She could have been his friend and still 'supported survivors', but she had to stab him in the back, too.
Senpai Trash has a flawless record of only posting trash, and by all that is good they are not about to ruin that record now.
resetera has been an amazing, cancer inducing read.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2018
It's funny, because I kind of get it. To them, the facts are: Vic is an abuser, he was dealt with appropriately (fired, shunned) - and then things went differently. Things got legal. But the main source on any of the legalities is a right-wing lawyer from YouTube who once did blackface - so he's a bad person who can't be trusted to say anything accurate. So a couple of people on the board (a paralegal from Canada! Someone who went to court once!) have said that this smells fishy, and of course Vic is the bad guy no questions asked - he's even a Christian who isn't turning the other cheek, how hypocritical! - so either there must be a way this could all turn bad for Vic or the world is showing itself to be an unfair, unjust place.
Thing being, that all requires that black and white thinking that comes from being highly insulated from opposing opinions, even if they happen to be, say, more factual and accurate than someone's theories who has watched all of both Law and Order and Law and Order: SVU. They have NPC conditioning, where any questions that don't fit the narrative - if this is all true about Vic, why is getting him fired enough punishment? If the right-wing lawyers are just making stuff up, why have so many of the accusations against Vic turned out to be fabrications? - don't fit the programming and so are instantly disregarded and the source attacked.
It's also funny on how much apparently hinges on them not believing that words on the internet matter. Because they didn't used to - not much. But these are the people who have keyboard warriored the position that people should be held accountable for what they say online. Of course, they thought that only meant being used against the Bad People with Bad Words, so the hypocrisy is at usual levels, but this is what they wanted, the just don't like it now they have it.
It's just ... it's like when you're a child, and your information sources are your parents and teachers, plus unreliable playground knowledge. Other kids could tell you things, and the adults in your life could tell you what was the truth, because they knew everything. And you just believe what they say, and believe who they say to trust, and you never have cause to doubt it because the world is either Good or Bad. And it just seems that some people never got learned enough, or never wanted to learn enough, to get out of that stage of education.
There's more, involving a whole Santa metaphor, but that's way too tl;dr spergery. Basically, I feel like I get why these various Twitter/PULL/Era/wherever speds are like the way they are, and can even see how I might have been in their place. But I can laugh at their bullshit because they're trapped in a ball of spite and anger and hatred of their own making. Their sanctimonious hypocrisy absolutely pisses me off, but knowing how self-inflicted so much of their misery is and how they're wilfully ignoring any of the tools to break out of it makes mocking them and their idiocy that much easier.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2018
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Lol what a moron. Ty Beard is head of a firm that has a guy in it who fucking helps WRITE Texas law as part of the legislature. But yeah Ty has no idea of Texas law. The sheer insanity of these tards never ceases to amaze.
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2014
The filing is available online. Does this fuckdrop just think it's a fake document?
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2018
(I'm recycling some caps from the main thread)
I don't know where anyone would get the idea that Broly is the lead character in the 'Dragon Ball Super: Broly' movie.
I don't know where anyone would get the idea that Broly is the lead character in the 'Dragon Ball Super: Broly' movie.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2014
The combined reading comprehension level of that forum is that of a five year old on a good day.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2018
My brother and I had an argument about this yesterday. He made the point the antagonist can't be the main character, but he can be the title character. If Rackets' word choice is anything to go by, brother won that argument.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
TV Tropes (yes I know) considers Broly the protagonist of the film, which would make him a villain protagonist.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2018
“Lead character” (LC) was the word used in the lawsuit, the idiots over on PULL wrote “Main Character” (MC). The ‘LC’ isn’t always necessarily the ‘MC’ but, the ‘main character’ is always a ‘LC’.
In DB, Goku & Vegeta are lead characters with Goku as the MC. In Broly, Goku, Vegeta & Broly are the lead characters, but Broly is the main character, we see him from childhood to adulthood, he has the most screentime and he gets the most character developtment throughout the movie.