Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
I want to know how the fuck an elven year old know that they want to change sex? I know that down the road, she/he will regreat it.
I usually think it's the parents projecting on to the kid in some perverse way or going along with a childhood fantasy and taking it way too far.
 
Some kind of horrifying straight man's pedeo schoolgirl fantasy
724131

724132724133724134724135724136724137

Started to notice how common a fantasy this seems to be among MtF troons. Maybe the way to solve MtF troonary is if you could get them to 'get over' their school crush, rather than fixate on them for years until the troonout?
Just two here but I've seen this same trope/story in other forms in various places:

732953732959732961732962732963

732952732953732954732955732956732957732958732959732960732961732962732963732964
.

732943

732945732946732948732947
 
CDC: One in Seven Transgender Women Have HIV

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a “Dear Colleague” letter Wednesday with warnings about the high prevalence and risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among transgender individuals.
“Transgender women and men are at high risk for getting HIV,” stated CDC in the letter signed by Eugene McCray, M.D. and Jonathan H. Mermin, M.D., MPH, of the agency’s National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention.

CDC, a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), stated:

According to current estimates, about 1 in 7 (14%) transgender women have HIV, and the percentage is much higher among black/African American (44%) and Hispanic/Latina (26%) transgender women.* An estimated 3% of transgender men have HIV.

The “Dear Colleague” letter continued:

Many transgender people face obstacles that make it harder to access HIV services—such as stigma and discrimination, inadequate employment or housing, and limited access to welcoming, supportive health care. Addressing these barriers is essential to the health and well-being of transgender people and to meeting the goals of the proposed federal initiative Ending the HIV Epidemic: A Plan for America. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is committed to working with you to make sure all transgender people can get the tools they need to prevent HIV and stay healthy if they have HIV.

The CDC’s warning about HIV among transgender individuals comes as the World Health Organization (WHO), the U.N.’s global health agency, recently announced that individuals who claim to be transgender no longer should be labeled with a mental illness.

Anticipating the upcoming publication of the 11th edition of its International Classification of Diseases (ICD), the WHO stated it has removed gender incongruence from its list of mental illnesses “to reduce the stigma” that may come with claiming to be a gender that is incongruent with one’s actual biological sex.

The WHO said simply stating transgender individuals are not mentally ill will promote “better social acceptance of individuals living with gender incongruence.”

“It was taken out from mental health disorders because we had better understanding that this wasn’t actually a mental health condition,” said Dr. Lale Say, the coordinator of the adolescents and at-risk populations team at the WHO. “Leaving it there was causing stigma, so in order to reduce the stigma, while also ensuring access to necessary health interventions this was placed to a different chapter, the sexual health chapter, in the new ICD.”

“The decision was not only based on the advocacy or feedback from the concerned communities,” she continued. “All available evidence was reviewed and discussed by an external advisory group and together with the scientific basis of this condition and the feedback from the professional community and concerned communities formed the basis of this decision.”

Say referenced a similar decision “on removing homosexuality out of ICD completely.”

“This again was based on the scientific understanding that there was no clear evidence that this issue needs to be medicalized,” she said.

According to the WHO, the version of ICD-11 that will be presented to the World Health Assembly in May 2019 will go into effect officially on January 1, 2022.
 
Male feminist has his woke work force revolt

View attachment 733614View attachment 733615
View attachment 733613
Not sure I can summon any sympathy for a man who identifies himself as a TERF tbh. Nor one that seems to have exclusively hired exceptional individuals
maybe you didn't know.. but lots of men, including me, been called TERF (along with "gender police"--hence the name) & i am old boring married centrist redneck who has long been skeptical of feminism & the hard left in general. i think #metoo is bullshit & say so regularly. hardly a "radical feminist". i didn't even know what this overused term meant when they first assigned it to me & i thought it was a joke.

then they put me on a "terf block list" so it was official.

the term might have started out with genuine meaning. but when you finally start assigning male hetero rednecks the title, i think it's probably lost its meaning & needs to be retired.

JMO.
 
Male feminist has his woke work force revolt

View attachment 733614View attachment 733615
View attachment 733613
Not sure I can summon any sympathy for a man who identifies himself as a TERF tbh. Nor one that seems to have exclusively hired exceptional individuals
If you build your identity around being a TERF, you’re as exceptional as someone who builds their identity around being trans. I very much doubt that this was the sole reason behind his business going under.
 
Here’s something horrifying for you.

The HIV stats: in the UK, TW are treated just like normal women for blood donation purposes, NOT as a high risk population.


The FDA does the same:

“Defer for 12 months from the most recent contact a man who has had sex with another man during the past 12 months.
Defer for 12 months from the most recent contact a female who has had sex during the past 12 months with a man who has had sex with another man in the past 12 months.
How do the recommendations apply to transgender individuals?

The FDA’s recommendation to blood establishments is that in the context of the donor history questionnaire, male or female gender should be self-identified and self-reported for the purpose of blood donation.”


So: a man who has sex with another man must be deferred for a year from last contact. But if that man self identifies as a woman, he is now treated as a Woman who has had sex with a man, who is now in a much lower risk category.

Peoples health is being put at risk by this.

I wonder if the first person given HIV this way will be able to sue?
 
One out of every 2 nigger trannies has AIDS fucking hell that is nightmare fuel. I don't even understand how that's possible. At what point do you just grab a fucking condom?

Trannies are incredibly promiscuous, I used to work with a tranny and after work I'd still be ordering drinks at the bar and she'd already be giving somebody a hand job on the dancefloor. Desperates. They reliably put out to anybody at the drop of a hat.
 
I wonder if the first person given HIV this way will be able to sue?

They test the blood but not donor by donor/bag by bag because that's a waste of time and expensive, instead they do it in big batches with samples from different bags and they track which bags batch #1234 came from. If something is detected they throw out all the blood the samples came from, a huge waste and that's probably why they don't want high-risk individuals shitting it up. So if HIV trannies becomes a problem it might not necessarily mean that anyone will be infected but it would mean that them donating blood results in LESS blood being available.

edit: oops, old information, @sperginity with a more up to date response below.
 
Last edited:
They test the blood but not donor by donor/bag by bag because that's a waste of time and expensive, instead they do it in big batches with samples from different bags and they track which bags batch #1234 came from. If something is detected they throw out all the blood the samples came from, a huge waste and that's probably why they don't want high-risk individuals shitting it up. So if HIV trannies becomes a problem it might not necessarily mean that anyone will be infected but it would mean that them donating blood results in LESS blood being available.
Tubes of blood are drawn at the time of transfusion (usually after the blood unit bag is filled) and labeled with a barcode that matches the bag, then the tubes are sent for testing. Bags are pulled if anything is wrong with the blood, and the units are not used for anything until the testing is complete. The whole "batch" thing was stopped when hemophiliacs got HIV and hepatitis in the 80s.

HIV testing is quick and reliable now so someone with AIDS is not likely to get their blood into the supply. The danger is a period of time between getting infected with HIV and having enough HIV present in the blood to detect it with the normal tests. There are extremely sensitive viral load tests that take a long time (they use PCR to detect the virus's DNA) but it is not practical to test every sample for it.

HIV drugs are very good now. If a person takes care of their health and takes their antiretrovirals they don't have a lot to worry about anymore. Hepatitis is way more of a concern imo.
 
Testing isn’t perfect - bacterial infections sometimes slip through and as previous poster says, the initial period after infection with HIV (and several other viral infections) is hard to detect.

It’s because of this that we have the questionnaires - LAYERS of protection are better than single protocols. Allowing a high risk group to circumvent a layer of protection to avoid ‘discrimination’ is unforgivable. We need to work on data and evidence based risk reduction. Peoples feels don’t come into it. If you’re in a high risk group you fail one layer of screening and are treated differently. It’s not a personal moral judgement, it’s and evidence based risk calculation.

The FDA and the UK blood service are actively putting the health of blood/blood product recipients at risk for woke points.

The TRA bending of reality to suit them can be laughed at /ignored in some situations, but it’s going to kill someone in this one.
 
Back