Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Companies wouldn't market soap specifically to women if women didn't buy soap that was designed to appeal to them. This shit doesn't happen in a vacuum... women (broadly) like soap that smells like flowers or fruit and comes in pretty colors. So soap companies make it on the assumption that women will spend money on it. And for the most part, they're right.

It's not some grand sexist conspiracy, it's giving the people what they want and putting some coin in your pocket at the same time. Not a difficult concept.
Yep. It's called gendered marketing. When it's applied, it can enable a company to drastically increase its sales depending on what the market for the specific item is like.
 
International Mr. Leather and the Conflict of Exclusivity Within the LGBT Community (NSFW)
https://archive.today/pTI4s

basically mysogony is a thing in the Gay community.
gay men are misogynists for not fucking some girl when she gatecrashed their orgy.

There are definitely some misogynistic gay men, but there's nothing misogynistic whatsoever about a bunch of gay guys not wanting a girl to crash their orgy. But no, let's call that sexist and discriminatory towards women and horribly close-minded. Everyone needs to be willing to fuck everyone, screw all of that talk about sexuality not being a choice!

Seriously, here are some things that I've heard from actual people:
  • Gay men are misogynistic because they hate women SO MUCH they'd rather fuck their own gender:
    MGzVEGi.png
  • Going off on that, Tumblrinas absolutely loathe cis gay men. And I know why. In their minds, gay men are no longer "oppressed enough." Their economy of oppression has advanced to the pointed where you can no longer only have one disadvantage; you need to step your game up! Of course, the majority of people who spit at gay people and insult them are teenage girls who identify as "demiqueer" and "genderfuck" and other such nonsense, so obviously they're in a position to determine who is disadvantaged or not. Also, hating gay people is SO not homophobic!
  • If you take someone home to have sexytimes and it turns out that they're transgendered, you are obligated to still have sex with them. Otherwise, you are a bigot of the highest order and need to kill yourself. It doesn't matter if you're a girl who's only sexually attracted to dicks, or a guy who's only attracted to vaginas, or any other possible combination of those things. It doesn't matter if you gently turn the person down while assuring them that it's not their fault. You're still not allowed to back out of sex and are required to fling pity sex at that poor trans person. Of course, these same people go silent or go insane from cognitive dissonance when you bring up that nobody is ever obligated to have sex with anyone, which is a cornerstone of their argument against rape/unwanted advances/etc.
  • According to them, sexuality and gender are choices. You know how activists and civil rights movements spent decades trying to get the public to understand that gay/bisexual/etc people really are just born that way? And that they shouldn't be discriminated against for something they have no control over? Well, Tumblrinas want to dismantle all of those decades of progress by promoting the idea that people can just choose what gender and sexuality they want. That's why there are about 3000 new genders on Tumblr.
 
While most of racists deserved to be fired, the q&as is what scratched my ass the most.

Oh and that first tldr post about the Pepsi guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: José Mourinho
??????????????????????????????
2GpC8t4.png

I really have nothing important to contribute to this. All I can do is express how much I hate, hate, HATE these stupid bullshit "pronouns." You use "she" if you identify as female, "he" if you're a male, and "they" if you're not either of those. How the fuck can you identify as rain? Or the Moon? Or HELL???

But then again, none of these are actually based on gender identity. To them, choosing pronouns is no different than choosing which shirt to wear.
 
I really have nothing important to contribute to this. All I can do is express how much I hate, hate, HATE these stupid bullshit "pronouns." You use "she" if you identify as female, "he" if you're a male, and "they" if you're not either of those. How the fuck can you identify as rain? Or the Moon? Or HELL???

But then again, none of these are actually based on gender identity. To them, choosing pronouns is no different than choosing which shirt to wear.

I know right? A pronoun is a generic substitute for a proper noun. If you have a set of pronouns that are unique to you then they're just proper nouns.
 
Ever wonder what a SJW would be as a parent? Well look no further than Ayrwen at Raising my boychick

Here is how she describes herself

Arwyn: A walking contradiction: knitting feminist fulltime parent, Wiccan science-minded woowoo massage student therapist!, queer-identified male-partnered monogamist, body-loving healthy-eating fat chick, unmedicated mostly-stable bipolar. This blog’s author and hostess. Send me an email at arwyn at raisingmyboychick dot com, or poke me on Twitter. I don’t bite, and I almost always respond.

Her man

The Man: Aforementioned male partner, parent, geek, and self-professed attached dad. A Straight White Male, hence the moniker.

Her son aka boychick

The Boychick: Born March 2007, male-assigned at birth (and so far apparently comfortable with that assignment), white, currently able-bodied, congenitally hypothyroid, cosleeper, former breastfed toddler, elimination communication graduate, sling baby and early walker, trial and terror, clichéd light of our life, and impetus for the blog. Odds are good he will be the most privileged of persons: a middle class, able bodied, cisgender, straight, white male. This blog is about raising him to know this, and to not be a douche despite it.

She seems really disappointed that her son is not as a special snowflake as her.

Her daughter

Vulva Baby: Assigned-girl child, born surprise breech at home September 2011. There is nothing further I can say about her that will not risk sending diabetic readers to the hospital.

Yes, she seriously calls her daughter Vulva baby. Because if she turns out trans or gender queer she will totally be scared for life because she was called a daughter as an infant.

-
She also calls making her children behave in public is a form of bigotry against children.

http://www.raisingmyboychick.com/2009/10/dancing-between-the-tables-on-the-personhood-of-children/

Here is the full post, but I'll give some highlights

This is but one example of the widespread phenomenon of child-hate disguised as simply a “concerned citizen”: children are OK in public, as long as they don’t in any way attract an adult’s attention. It usually comes with a hefty dose of mother-blame (which is a type ofmisogyny, remember), in the form of “she should control her kids, or keep them at home!”

When the parent-blaming child-shaming folk say “I treat kids like people by expecting them to act like it” what they’re really saying is “I expect kids to act like adults”, which boils down to the belief that only adults are people. Because if you actually recognize that children are in fact persons, then you would be able to see that yes, actually, people do do those things in public, and the proof is dancing right in front of you.

This argument is common among so-called “allies” in many fields of anti-oppression work: “Of course I don’t have a problem with [women/gays/immigrants/people with disabilities/people of color/trans persons] — when they act just like me. As long as they [act like men/couple and get married/learn English/act able/act white/are straight and gender normative], of course they should have rights!” It is a fundamentally flawed position, whose bigotry I trust is self-apparent, and serves only to reify the hierarchies it purports to reject.

So that child, dancing in the aisle while you are dining? Their personhood means they have just as much right to be there as you do. If they are unreasonably blocking the way, or damaging property, or causing such a commotion that no other patron is able to also be comfortable in that space — in other words, if they are actually doing something objectively objectionable — then of course you have a cause to complain. And perhaps that was the case in the original screed I read: I cannot know. But regardless, if in the course of your complaint, no matter how legitimate, you state that children need to act like adults(especially using the code word “people”) or not be allowed out in public? If your objection is, at its base, that they are a child in public, daring to act like a child? Then you are an anti-child bigot, and you are the problem in that restaurant that needs to be sent home until you can act like a person.
 
Vulva baby?
???
???????????
This is the one valid time to use the word 'vagina' instead of 'vulva' BECAUSE BABIES DON'T COME OUT OF YOUR VULVA YOU FUCKING PSYCHO
Edit: lol I realize now that she just means she has a daughter but is too cool to say it that way. Grreeeaaat.
Also, she's bipolar and not taking meds. Nice. Good thing to expose your child to, right there.

Edit 2: She lives in Portland OR.
Why am I not surprised? I used to live near Portland and that place is full of half-sane transients, stuck-up hipsters and nutjob hippies.
 
Last edited:
Thing is, when kids dance/run in the aisles of a restaurant or wherever, they usually don't do it silently. There be all manner of shrieking and screaming. I'd say that's pretty damn objectionable if you're trying to enjoy a nice meal.

I can condemn this and tell a mother off for it (and I have in similar situations) and still consider children to be "in fact persons." Persons who lack good judgement and empathy, and need to be told by persons who do have these things how to behave lest this world turn into Lord of the Flies.
 
I can condemn this and tell a mother off for it (and I have in similar situations) and still consider children to be "in fact persons." Persons who lack good judgement and empathy, and need to be told by persons who do have these things how to behave lest this world turn into Lord of the Flies.

Next time she takes her kids out to dinner, someone's gonna need to bring some rocks.
 
This person sounds like an excellent candidate for the STFUParents blog.

I will never be a parent but raising your kid to associate guilt with who they are sounds like a shitty thing to do. "You're privileged - now feel awful." When you're an adult you can healthily differentiate between knowing to count your blessings and tumblr's nuttiness, but for a young kid raised that way it could really mess them up. Well at least if he develops anxiety or depression he won't be neurotypical anymore.
 
Children aren't people. They are terrible monsters that must be taught to be responsible adults.

And letting your child dance between tables in a restaurant? That's not acknowledging their personhood, that's asking a server to drop a heavy tray of hot food on their head, which I guarantee will be more scarring than telling them to sit down and shut the fuck up when grown folks is talkin'.
 
Back