- Joined
- Jan 21, 2019
you can be disbarred for it,
Good thing that Mr./Mrs. Soye is not the type of guy to quickly file frivolous bar complaints when he feels he's been hurt! Oh...
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you can be disbarred for it,
No. Full stop. You don't get to spend 10 years calling someone a pedo/rapist/criminal and then suddenly worry about "undue burdens." Literally every reason given here is Vic's cause to seek remedy....it is necessary to protect Defendant from undue burden, unnessessary expense, harassment, annoyance, and/or invasion of personal, constitutional, or property rights.
Because you go to war with the army you have. Not the army you wish you had.I’m trying hard to figure out to what productive purpose? It was obvious he wasn’t going to be able to bully BHBH into his deposition/TCPA trap. So why keep flinging poop?
I'm pretty sure the Judge is going to see the communication between Ty and Casey and will see that Ty has been exceedingly willing to negotiate times and has been patient in his requests and has been met with nothing but a brick wall. "No you can't depose my clients first. Vic's Deposition -must- be on the 30th or as close to that date as possible." and so on and will quickly get the picture at what Casey is trying to do.
If Ron and Monica's lawyer filed a TCPA motion, would Marchi and FUNimation have to sit on their hands for 90 days as well or could they move forward with their own depositions and discovery requests?
I just posted this in MoRons thread, but it should probably be posted here too. This is Monica's busy schedule, note her next convention is in Texas. But what i really want to hear is the argument of why Soye can't be deposed during the month.Treating the judge like he is a fool is never a great move, so I want to see what kind of arguments come out of his pie hole.
"My client will not be available on the 15th"
Monica confirmed in texas and has no cons to visit between the 12 and 23. Even if you give a day buffer to get to and from the con there's still a solid week before her next convention appearance. And if Ron has the free time to binge watch entire seasons of a show (Lucifer) in a day or two then I'd say he's got more than enough availability.
Of course Monica could always cancel -another- con. After all, it wouldn't be the first time.
Guests usually fly in the day before their con appearance (ie Thursday if they start on Friday) and usually leave early the following Monday, unless they stay with friends or whatever. Sometimes they'll also fly back home on the night of the last day of their appearance.
That gives Monica a week and a half to be deposed before heading to Atlanta.
But watch them be "busy" and make up excuses until after her Indy con.
We have no earthly idea what the judge will do. He COULD declare the independant trapnostate of Austonia. But use your common sense, I guess, and temper your expectations.Did some further digging into Deposition rules and so on, am I correct in assuming that at this point in time given all the evidence provided by ty, that when papers are filed tomorrow and things get put before a judge, Casey Erick is basically put on the spot and needs to come up with a pretty damn good reason as to why he's been evading the deposition dates? Like at this point Ty doesn't even have to prove anything further and basically from here Casey has to explain why for the last 2 weeks he's refused to provide dates for his clients, and why he refuses to accept any of the proposed dates or windows as far as I can tell, and "I don't want to" isn't going to cut it either.
One thing that stands out to me is how Casey's documents so far have been a bunch of 10-pages-worth of copy-pasted legalese while Ty's latest letter is written in plain, clear english. Even when compared, the initial documents by BHBH are much more straightforward to read.the communication between Ty and Casey
I think the letter that was sent from Casey to Ty was not archived, or at least Ty says as much in his reponse. In the same way you're saying "everything being archived gives the judge a clear understanding of what's going on", the fact that this one letter that required a pretty severe rebuttal and schooling on basic principles of law (ie: the right to deposition) not being made available is definitely going to raise some flags.All the relevant documents have been included in their entirety, too,
I think this goes beyond Landau... Media attention to the case because of the attorneys fuck ups and a case against them. Last I recall, apart from our and Masterson's part of the internet, no one knows who Landau is, and he's not had proceedings brought against him.I just went through it and if you don't mind can you explain these pics ? Because the tl;dr i am getting from this is that Casey and other attorneys involved basically fucked with the photographer due to
View attachment 753518
This is the info about the case
View attachment 753519
View attachment 753520
View attachment 753524
View attachment 753521
Also this lol what ? Poorly written? Are we dealing with landau here rofl.
View attachment 753528
View attachment 753526
I do wanna look into the actual case Cooper v Steve etc whatever it is as maybe it might not be true but its already 8 in the morning. Time to go sleep. Maybe
What stuck out to me is the complete lack of explanations, or citations. He says that the requests are overbroad and not reasonably limited in scope, but doesn't explain in what way. He says the request covers information that is priveleged, but doesn't explain what's privileged, or why. He says the information can be gotten by Ty from more convenient sources, but doesn't explain why (sidenote; anyone wonder if he means the Farms here since we've archived basically everything at this point?). He tells the judge he can issue a protective order to protect them from annoyance, harassment, invasion of rights etc but doesn't explain how/why his client is facing any of those. Last time I checked judges don't generally need to be told that they can do something, but why they should do something.One thing that stands out to me is how Casey's documents so far have been a bunch of 10-pages-worth of copy-pasted legalese while Ty's latest letter is written in plain, clear english.
The Beard's counter-motion to the motion to quash
Exhibit F and G are new on thereThe Beard's counter-motion to the motion to quash