- Joined
- Feb 10, 2017
They cited that shitty Tumblr blog in a legal document.
My sides have left the galaxy.
My sides have left the galaxy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"We tried to destroy Vic personally and professionally and colluded with others to make it happen. And then, for some reason, Vic dragged us to court. What an asshole, am I right Judge? BTW here's a Tumblr blog to show how right we are."
This shit right here is mind boggling. These dipshits run around for months, years even, defaming and lynch-mobbing a man online on any social media platform they can find; and they have the gall to pretend that he is the one that was doing this to them after the public sees through their bullshit. Jesus these people have no shame.
This shit right here is mind boggling. These dipshits run around for months, years even, defaming and lynch-mobbing a man online on any social media platform they can find; and they have the gall to pretend that he is the one that was doing this to them after the public sees through their bullshit. Jesus these people have no shame.
The crazy thing is - I think Ron and Monica at least may actually believe the things stated in this response they've filed. Being so completely wrong about so many things whilst thinking you're right would go a long way towards explaining many of their actions.
Is this an actual legal defense to defamation? Someone can go on Twitter or Facebook or what have you and call you a rapist or anything under the sun, and if you publicly deny it that person isn't liable? That seems insane and I find it hard to believe.
These citations are hilarious.
View attachment 757694
View attachment 757693
This is how sad their case is. Jesus.
I sure as hell hope Ron and Nonica have figured out how to produce “Michelle” in the flesh? Because if not this is going to go very badly for them. Due all these little Tumblr’ina’s realize they are about to be put under oath and penalty of perjury?
This is the legal version of "it's just a prank bro!" right? I can't be the only one who thinks this is some fucking strip mall lawyer level shit? I hope they're not paying Casey top dollar to put out responses that are flimsier than a paper boat fill with gravy.View attachment 757729
Is this an actual legal defense to defamation? Someone can go on Twitter or Facebook or what have you and call you a rapist or anything under the sun, and if you publicly deny it that person isn't liable? That seems insane and I find it hard to believe.
Also lol
View attachment 757733
View attachment 757734
I'm not an attorney, so my answer may be incomplete, but I will answer them in reverse order. Maybe, and no, not completely. I think that if I were Ty, I would file a motion to strike due to the fact that it was written improperly.Does the existence of the Defendant's Original Answer mean they aren't in danger of defaulting now? I.e., is that the paper that needed to be posted before 10?
My state follows Federal style pleading about 99% of the time, so this kind of pleading in the Answer seems very strange to me. I'm used to pretty bland numbered paragraphs admitting or denying the claims in the Complaint until you get to your counterclaims.
I don't know if Texas has pleading rules that let you just kind of do free form shit-talking.
*Opens statements implying Vic's sexual assault and harrasment, as they claimed, is truth*No, of course not. This is yet another desperate Hail Mary, the scumfuck MoRon equivalent of squirting ink and running away, or Shane tossing a shoe at someone covered in BBQ sauce and hiding behind his chair.
Also from your post:
View attachment 757735
"Your honor, you have to assume everyone knew we were lying, which means it CAN'T be defamation."
View attachment 757739
Did their Superlawyer literally just go down every possible defense to Defamation and claim them, just to see if one stuck? JFC
So does Texas. This filing is hot garbage. Atrocious. Incompetent. Full stop.