Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

I have a soft spot for this accurate rendition, myself.
757761
 
So their defense is going to be...

"It's all true, so it isn't defamation."

Judge: Produce the eyewitneses or victims.
Defense: ...it's all true, you can believe me, I'm an officer of the Court!
Judge: So was Michael Cohen, what's your point?

And I will scream from the gallery LEGAL BURN and allow myself to be held in contempt.

(This fanfiction is just as legitimate as the PULL and Tumblr blogs they cite as 'evidence' and thus you should believe it happened, even though I offer no proof of it and, in fact, the use of future tense rather than past tense is applied.)
The funniest part about all of this is that they're claiming it's all true. In their delusional fantasy land it might be true. But that's only because they've literally redefined the definition of sexual assault to the point that normal human interactions are deemed sexual assault.

Even if everything they're accusing him of (that we know of currently) is true, they still slandered him.
 
One of their defenses is that everyone had to know they were full of shit, therefore it can't be defamation.

View attachment 757737

No, seriously. That's their defense.

"Your honor, clearly everyone knows we were full of shit and just spouting off lies and other bullshit to try and hurt Vic's career. Therefore it's not defamation, it's just being a spitefuck little dickwad, and that's not illegal!"
So, they're not only claiming that they shouldn't be held liable for believing statements made by anonymous posts... but they're also using those same anonymous posts as evidence Vic had done it, or at the very least widely known he did it? Am I having a stroke right now?
 
I may be all wrong here, but having just read thru the affirmative defense , it appears that Casey is throwing everything at the wall and hoping something sticks. The statements were true. The statements were hyperbole. Statute of Limitations are up. My clients are so dumb anything they say is not to be read literally. I did find it interesting that MoRonica requested a jury trial. I guess they like their chances better with 12 conservatives as opposed to one?

When your clients refuse to settle and also have nothing to back up their statements, throwing everything at the wall is about all you can do. The defences don't have to be consistent with one another. Also, they're not required to provide all of the evidence supporting their defence in their initial answer, just like Vic didn't have to provide all of the evidence supporting his complaint in the initial filing.

Marchi hiding in her house suggests that she hasn't retained counsel. Her lawyer would have just contacted Ty to accept service if she had one.
 
Last edited:
Late and gay but fuck this thread moves fast.

They are done waiting for her to come out. They are petitioning to just post it on her door and let that be it.

View attachment 757680
Oh but what happened to wanting his balls? It must be a coincidence that as soon as shit got real every one of these cowards pussied out. Take your licks, you deserve them you horrible shrews.
 
So, they're not only claiming that they shouldn't be held liable for believing statements made by anonymous posts... but they're also using those same anonymous posts as evidence Vic had done it, or at the very least widely known he did it? Am I having a stroke right now?

No, that's just your brain rejecting the "logic." If it starts to make sense then seek immediate medical attention.


You gotta admit, those are some brass balls on them. Well, on Monica, anyway.
 
Late and gay but fuck this thread moves fast.


Oh but what happened to wanting his balls? It must be a coincidence that as soon as shit got real every one of these cowards pussied out. Take your licks, you deserve them you horrible shrews.

chuckhole gangsters
 
Back