Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

captkrisma · May 14, 2019

Upon seeing units from Vic and Ty advance towards Objective MoRon, units under the command of Casey attempted to shoot rounds impeding the movement of the breaching element. The rounds, however, were produced by a unreliable source and either had no impact on own troops, or had prematurely detonated within the cannons, rendering them inoperable.

I'm trying to write up a backbrief for Kamehacon and those shenanigans.

ShinyStar · May 14, 2019

Army Burger said:
View attachment 758560

Jamie Marchi on Twitter: "I mean.. yeah. I know this. Now, let's try …

archived 14 May 2019 16:11:31 UTC

archive.fo

Because you're scared, Jamie.

Oh, dear Jamie, bless your heart. Here's some critical thinking to help you out. They can't just tape it to the front door unless the judge gives them permission to do that. The judge won't give them permission unless they can show they've attempted in good faith to serve you in person and that's just not working (because you're hiding from them). Since they've now done that, you're going to get the tape treatment. How embarrassing!

Kosher Salt · May 14, 2019

AnOminous said:
Attorneys are obligated to perform some diligence in researching what they present as fact (which clearly was not done here), but filings aren't generally under oath. When they are, like an affidavit, they include a statement to that effect.

I've been noticing that the filings in this case so far have included a statement, sworn under oath, that they are true and correct. For example:

I assume it's required in Texas.

Just what the penalties might be for filing a document that's full of outright fabrications and supported by fraudulent evidence (to the point where it should be fairly obvious at even just a cursory glance), I don't know.

What I do know is that I'd really like to see Casey S. Erick have to explain, under oath and under penalty of perjury, why he filed an internet forum post as evidence which is dated 7 Feb 2017 but clearly and obviously had to be written later than that.

ShinyStar · May 14, 2019

Bad language! Apparently I'm too boomer to figure out how to embed tweets, or delete posts when my failure to embed a tweet makes my post look

wickedlilium · May 14, 2019

Kosher Salt said:
I've been noticing that the filings in this case so far have included a statement, sworn under oath, that they are true and correct. For example:
View attachment 758709

I assume it's required in Texas.

Just what the penalties might be for filing a document that's full of outright fabrications and supported by fraudulent evidence (to the point where it should be fairly obvious at even just a cursory glance), I don't know.

Casey can claim that what they gave him and what they believed was true is indeed true based on his judgement. The evidence that they handed him doesn't have to be true but this just means that the answers that where handed out was most likely not done by Casey but from MoRonica and Soye and he just signed off on it to get this shit rolling.

Kosher Salt · May 14, 2019

wickedlilium said:
Casey can claim that what they gave him and what they believed was true is indeed true based on his judgement. The evidence that they handed him doesn't have to be true but this just means that the answers that where handed out was most likely not done by Casey but from MoRonica and Soye and he just signed off on it to get this shit rolling.

He swore under oath that the facts stated within their response were within his personal knowledge and that they are "true and correct".

If even a cursory reading of their evidence shows that it's clearly false, I cannot fathom how he could have personal knowledge of the facts and still believe them to be "true and correct".

Intelligent Calcium · May 14, 2019

Does Marchi realize that she is implying that the process server was lying in their report when she claims she was totally not hiding when they attempted to serve her? Because only one of those statements can be true. What is more likely, that the process server, who has no stake in this, is faking official reports to make her look bad or that Jamie Marchi lies without shame and hesitation to the detriment of others to preserve her ego? Great look.

RodgerDodger · May 14, 2019

wickedlilium said:
Don't know about Montreal but Quebec play's a different ball game then the rest of Canada, they have similar laws and things but businesses tend to be protected more due to them restricting the types of jobs that are allowed in there.
Montreal I can see if it's just there due to all the manufacturing company's and they only put the HQ there simply because of that.

Quebec is like Louisiana in the US. Most of Canada, like 49 of the 50 US states system of law evolved and was adapted from the British Common Law. Quebec and Louisiana were heavily influenced by French Imperial Civil Law sometimes referred to as Napoleonic Code. Louisiana also embeds some Spanish Civil Law to further fuck things up.

GeneralMint · May 14, 2019

Kosher Salt said:
He swore under oath that the facts stated within their response were within his personal knowledge and that they are "true and correct".

If even a cursory reading of their evidence shows that it's clearly false, I cannot fathom how he could have personal knowledge of the facts and still believe them to be "true and correct".

Remember the attorney is only the client's representative. Not a witness. He is attesting he has knowledge of his clients statements and is basically saying "it is true that my clients have made the following statements" .

RodgerDodger · May 14, 2019

Kosher Salt said:
I've been noticing that the filings in this case so far have included a statement, sworn under oath, that they are true and correct. For example:
View attachment 758709

I assume it's required in Texas.

Just what the penalties might be for filing a document that's full of outright fabrications and supported by fraudulent evidence (to the point where it should be fairly obvious at even just a cursory glance), I don't know.

What I do know is that I'd really like to see Casey S. Erick have to explain, under oath and under penalty of perjury, why he filed an internet forum post as evidence which is dated 7 Feb 2017 but clearly and obviously had to be written later than that.

I’m assuming that is just a pro formal statement for Texas filings? Which would make sense. Otherwise it seems like a statement that someone else wrote it, and Casey just signed off on it. The point where he specifies that he validated the defendants verified denials is interesting.

As for what happens when you lie in a filing? It can be bad. Legal filings are not presented as under oath, because they are made by Lawyers. Certified Officers of the Court. Their license and profession requires them to be truthful before the court. (More or less. Everybody involved understands how and where you can and cannot stretch the truth.) the Judge, courts and State Bar all have remedies for lawyers that abuse this.

And Lawyers are not alone in this sort of thing. There are a number of documents and actors that you may encounter in everyday life that carry a similar presumption of and obligation to truthfulness. You Medical Charts for example carry a similar presumption. Police Reports, EMS reports, Fire Service and Fire Marshall/Code Enforcement/Health Inspector reports all carry similar presumptions. Basically any sworn/badged Civil Officer, and certain State Licensed And regulated professionals.

Spectre_06 · May 14, 2019

Kiomei said:
Wut lol? That's not a good thing, these guys/girls/trannies sure as hell don't have a fucking clue what's going on unless it references them, and still they don't get the picture as to why.

Hitler's been mentioned in legal briefs as well, so that means that PULL is literally equivalent to Hitler.

UA 674 · May 14, 2019

Ah, this is great. I knew Marchi was getting all paranoid schizo but her actually talking on Twitter, acting like we're the bugs crawling all over her eyes and quoting Bible shit? She's lost her marbles

ctalkep · May 14, 2019

I had a theory that Marchi mistook Lamont Aldridge for a Mormon, but he doesn't fit the profile...

See You N' Court

See You N' Court, Dallas, Texas. 135 likes. Finding those who don't want to be found and serving our clients needs.

www.facebook.com

SomeWhatFuckTard · May 14, 2019

Forgive me if I'm incorrect, but if Ty really wanted to, could he request the court for a Civil Bench Warrant if Jamie chooses to continue avoiding the papers? Or, if she does get the serving, doesn't appear in court?

5t3n0g0ph3r · May 14, 2019

archived 14 May 2019 20:32:17 UTC

archive.fo

RIP AgitoZ. You were sent to SJW Siberia to be "re-educated" for "not caring for others."
With each ban, the site is slowly becoming PULL: an echo chamber.

Slab Bulkhead · May 14, 2019

At one point I was wondering if Marchi dodging service was a coordinated plan from the three stooges. Marchi delays her servicing as long as possible, extending out her potential TCPA filing date. If it were not for the defense showing they are completely and utterly without rational thought (as it seems Marchi -still- has not retained legal council from all appearances) I'd maybe think this were the case and it was some sort of strategy.

After seeing Marchi's exceptional response on Twitter, again acting like Twitter Court is more important than -actual court-, I have to reconsider and instead have come to the conclusion that she's just that dumb.

RodgerDodger · May 14, 2019

SomeWhatFuckTard said:
Forgive me if I'm incorrect, but if Ty really wanted to, could he request the court for a Civil Bench Warrant if Jamie chooses to continue avoiding the papers? Or, if she does get the serving, doesn't appear in court?

No. The worst outcome of failing to answer the lawsuit would be a default judgement against her. The only thing that would get her ass hauled in would be blowing off a subpoena.

Yuusha-sama · May 14, 2019

5t3n0g0ph3r said:
snip

RIP AgitoZ. You were sent SJW Siberia to be "reeducated" for "not caring for others."
With each ban, the site is slowly becoming PULL: an echo chamber.

This thread is pure TDS.
I should take some screencaps for the TDS thread.

Tard · May 14, 2019

Intelligent Calcium said:
Does Marchi realize that she is implying that the process server was lying in their report when she claims she was totally not hiding when they attempted to serve her? Because only one of those statements can be true. What is more likely, that the process server, who has no stake in this, is faking official reports to make her look bad or that Jamie Marchi lies without shame and hesitation to the detriment of others to preserve her ego? Great look.

I cannot believe it's getting to the point where they are claiming that the process server is lying.
What would the process server even get out of lying? What is she even thinking when she makes weird claims like this?? Especially when you are currently under fire for supposedly lying about a man sexually harassing you? It's making it even easier for us to point out she's a lying psycho when she turns around and tries to accuse professionals with no attachment of lying in official documents

Jub-Jub · May 14, 2019

ctalkep said:
I had a theory that Marchi mistook Lamont Aldridge for a Mormon, but he doesn't fit the profile...

See You N' Court

See You N' Court, Dallas, Texas. 135 likes. Finding those who don't want to be found and serving our clients needs.

www.facebook.com

She's just racist, wouldn't open the door to a black man. Or maybe she thought it was Nick in his shit-face disguise.

Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Your worst nightmare, child

(((NaCl)))

Your worst nightmare, child

(((NaCl)))

Humble Fantabulist

Wintergreen is threat to Best Korea

My views do not reflect the Kiwi Farms in any way.

UA 674

Guest

Resident Archivist

We did a little trolling