Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?

  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Holden said:
holy - nonsense like female rapists are dismissed not by only by me but sexist things like psychology, human nature and anatomy.
Click to expand...
Depends on your definition of Rape... since you agree that the commonly used one nowadays is the one you use, then you don't dismiss the concept of female rapists...

That, and psychology? Has nothing to do with whether or not something fits the physical act of rape... human nature? Pretty much Psychology... Anatomy? Oh boy... since you can rape someone using things other than a penis... using the common definition that is used nowadays, that is.

Don't tell me you don't use that definition... I don't want to trawl back to find the argument we had over whether you used an archaic and incomplete definition or used the modern one people use now... and if you don't, it doesn't matter. After all, since most people use it, the definition fits and they don't dismiss the concept.

Ergo, either you are using that definition or you are wrong... and you're wrong if you are using that definition, so either way you're wrong. (feel free to dismiss this as the lunatic ramblings of a 40+ yo non-virgin... it won't change the fact that you're wrong, but it will make you feel that little bit better about yourself)

:edit: While I've got your attention, does it evolve those 3 or not?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Coral Apples and NobleGreyHorse
Holy wait what? said:
Depends on your definition of Rape... since you agree that the commonly used one nowadays is the one you use, then you don't dismiss the concept of female rapists...
Click to expand...
i used this definition only to the point of actual carnal knowledge of women. i don't agree with any feminist expansions. i used that definition of rape and not the actual one (a rape of a non slut) to make my point on why feminism will bring just rape. i explained this weeks ago, you manchild moron
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Coral Apples, Saney and NobleGreyHorse
rapists are a protected, sacred trucker class in the west. they are rapidly overcoming seducers, who were an even worse evil, and due to children become feral they are becoming the nr.1 choice for women. this might have serious implications in terms of incels being successful since there will no longer be any need for something as impossible as seduction and just taking a woman on the street will be what works. but unless you want to live in such a society i suggest you move.
 
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Deviant
Reactions: Coral Apples, Trombonista, Saney and 4 others
Holden said:
rapists are a protected, sacred trucker class in the west. they are rapidly overcoming seducers, who were an even worse evil, and due to children become feral they are becoming the nr.1 choice for women. this might have serious implications in terms of incels being successful since there will no longer be any need for something as impossible as seduction and just taking a woman on the street will be what works. but unless you want to live in such a society i suggest you move.
Click to expand...
That may be your magnum opus there.
"Sacred trucker class"
My fucking sides.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: cluelessly, Saney, NobleGreyHorse and 3 others
You have no idea what relationships are. Women are to men here, like almost all modern men, holes to fuck. Dick, vaginas, holes, all you know. When somebody provides me evidence that nazis wanted to massacre all men who understood relationships the way liberalism did I'll agree with your insane claims that nazism was worse. Liberalism made it impossible for you to reproduce in the West unless you're an utter moron. Unlike nazism, that targeted certain races, it targets intelligence and decency. So while in nazism intelligent people could have survived if they were the right race this is no longer possible in liberalism. Hence liberalism is much, much worse than nazism.

I have very rarely seen anybody who wasn't some kind of a moron with a gf. Where have all the sane men gone? Why didn't their genes reproduce? It's ultimately more worrying than holocaust propaganda and emotional claims about trains and gas and shit.
 
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
Reactions: Coral Apples, Saney, NobleGreyHorse and 4 others
Arctic said:
This is another one of your contradictictions. Feminism as a whole is disgusted by rape and views it as a part of patriarchy. And yet you claim that society is both controlled by feminists AND glorifies rape. Do you have any idea what any of these words mean?

And for the record, I think I speak for everyone on here when I say that none of us condone rape in any form and for good reasons. Just glancing through this thread should give you an idea of that.
Click to expand...
I've explained this many times over - feminism destroys women's need for providers and makes them mate with horrible men. In time children become completely feral and can only reproduce through what we now see as rape-

Regarding patriarchy and self-determination. Feminism is actually a slut-empowerment movement. All of its goals are there to empower sluts. Feminists hate stay at home moms, for example. Their movement has nothing to do with self-determination.
Rape isn't a part of the patriarchy since it is just an act. It wouldn't magically disappear in any kind of society. In fact, it was less prevalent in patriarchy since sluts weren't legally able to be raped and it carried severe penalties.
 
  • Dumb
  • Deviant
Reactions: Cuck Norris, Coral Apples, Trombonista and 3 others
Dr. Boe Jangles Esq. said:
Ooooo sick burn!
You harp on IQ a lot. I was curious as to why. It seems like your go-to if you can't refute someone's point. Do you think if you're smarter, you're less wrong?
Click to expand...
To be fair IQ isn't his only go-to insult method. He also tends to bring up body odor and virginity (all things he has no way of actuallyknowing) :)
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Coral Apples, Saney, Dr. Boe Jangles Esq. and 1 other person
Holden said:
i used this definition only to the point of actual carnal knowledge of women. i don't agree with any feminist expansions. i used that definition of rape and not the actual one (a rape of a non slut) to make my point on why feminism will bring just rape. i explained this weeks ago, you manchild moron
Click to expand...
Excellent... so you don't even use the definition that was in use several centuries ago...

I guess Feminism was in charge back in the 1500's then... who would have thought it? (in case you don't get it, it means your crap about feminism changing the definition of rape is just that... crap. And yes, we went over this weeks ago...I really don't want to go back and find them to quote at you, since you'll just ignore them again, but they are there)

Oh, and does it evolve those three or not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NobleGreyHorse
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back