Careercow Jamie Lynn Marchi / Jamie Perez / marchimark / She Devil - Wants Vic's head and balls, but not his papers; Cucked by a Chicken Sandwich

[Jub-Jub]

Of course she is. People are happy to keep feeding her ego by giving her attention on twitter. She's like a toddler saying "I know you are but what am I?" to everything.

She was doing that earlier this month

 

[Beavis]

Here's a thought, couldn't Jamie get given jail time for contempt towards the court? For avoiding the serving papers perchance knowingly so?

I doubt it. Now if she decides to no show for court when she has to she could be.

 

[break these cuffs]

Here's a thought, couldn't Jamie get given jail time for contempt towards the court? For avoiding the serving papers perchance knowingly so?

I doubt it. Now if she decides to no show for court when she has to she could be.

No. It would result in a default judgement. This is civil court. Ignore the court and don't make an argument against the other guy, the other guy wins. Now if she was subpoenaed as a witness or something, that is a different story.

 

[Bender]

Here's a thought, couldn't Jamie get given jail time for contempt towards the court? For avoiding the serving papers perchance knowingly so?

I'm not from Americaland, so I'm gonna guess no.

There's no evidence to show actually avoided being served, the dog pawing at the blinds in the window is just as valid a story as the server's document.
Regarding everything she's said afterwards, FIRST AMENDMENT BABY, she can say what the fuck she likes and I very much doubt a judge is going to throw a contempt of court charge for something that happened outside of court.

However, I reckon her arrogance and gloating about evading the notice will come into play during deposition or the trial, which won't make her look good to the jury who had to take time off work (probably without pay) to go watch this "runningfromthelawl" moron's trial.

@AnOminous & @RodgerDodger, please tear me apart because I know I'm wrong, I just don't know how I'm wrong.

 

[AnOminous]

Here's a thought, couldn't Jamie get given jail time for contempt towards the court? For avoiding the serving papers perchance knowingly so?

No.

@AnOminous & @RodgerDodger, please tear me apart because I know I'm wrong, I just don't know how I'm wrong.

She's allowed to be as much of a cunt about service as she likes. Now she's served, though. Deadlines for answering and compelled discovery are not nearly so forgiving.

 

[Bender]

No.

Well at least I'm off to a good start, surely my reasoning is wrong?

 

[Adach_Ame]

Alright, was just checking

 

[AnOminous]

Well at least I'm off to a good start, surely my reasoning is wrong?

Nope, they won't do anything to her over dodging service. They'll remember it, though. If they have to determine her credibility on other issues or whether to cut any slack on future transgressions or just nail her to the wall, they'll definitely remember her disrespect, though.

 

[Bender]

Nope, they won't do anything to her over dodging service. They'll remember it, though. If they have to determine her credibility on other issues or whether to cut any slack on future transgressions or just nail her to the wall, they'll definitely remember her disrespect, though.

Holy shit, I know more about Texas law than Marchi who lives in Texas. I should buy a gun to celebrate.

 

[JosephTX]

Here's a thought, couldn't Jamie get given jail time for contempt towards the court? For avoiding the serving papers perchance knowingly so?

No, you can only be jailed for civil contempt if you violate a court order compelling an action on your part, IE submit to discovery, deposition or failure to retract.

 

[Bender]

Okay, can you guys tell me if you actually know shit about American (preferably Texas) law so I know who I can actually listen to with minimal bullshit? I'm pretty sure @AnOminous knows his shit, and @RodgerDodger probably does too, I'm adding @JosephTX to this list, since he has TX in his name, and I think it was @Kosher Salt that seems to have some insight to the court system too.

Edit: I ain't asking for powerlevels, just a "yeah, I know Texas law" or "yeah, I know American law".

 

[Far Queue]

I ain't asking for powerlevels, just a "yeah, I know Texas law" or "yeah, I know American law".

A good piece of advice is that you shouldn't put too much faith into anything you read on the internet. The idiots over on PULL will tell you that they know the law. However, I believe @AnOminous is a former lawyer, but then again that's just something someone else here said. I'm inclined to believe it from several of his posts, but my knowledge is limited enough that someone could skillfully bullshit without me being able to tell.

I think the only reason this case seems so cut and dry is that the defendants are all complete idiots. I recall that during Nick's last stream with his lawyer buddies that one of them said this case was almost unfair because one of his professors in law school said you'd never get a case this straightforward where everything just falls into your lap so neatly.

 

[break these cuffs]

Okay, can you guys tell me if you actually know shit about American (preferably Texas) law so I know who I can actually listen to with minimal bullshit? I'm pretty sure @AnOminous knows his shit, and @RodgerDodger probably does too, I'm adding @JosephTX to this list, since he has TX in his name, and I think it was @Kosher Salt that seems to have some insight to the court system too.

Edit: I ain't asking for powerlevels, just a "yeah, I know Texas law" or "yeah, I know American law".

Holy shit just lurk moar newfag

 

[JosephTX]

Okay, can you guys tell me if you actually know shit about American (preferably Texas) law so I know who I can actually listen to with minimal bullshit? I'm pretty sure @AnOminous knows his shit, and @RodgerDodger probably does too, I'm adding @JosephTX to this list, since he has TX in his name, and I think it was @Kosher Salt that seems to have some insight to the court system too.

Edit: I ain't asking for powerlevels, just a "yeah, I know Texas law" or "yeah, I know American law".

I'm better with criminal law than civil, I regularly end up deferring to @AnOminous on civil procedure since civil law is shrouded in several layers of Jewish magics I have no knowledge of.

 

[Bender]

A good piece of advice is that you shouldn't put too much faith into anything you read on the internet. The idiots over on PULL will tell you that they know the law. However, I believe @AnOminous is a former lawyer, but then again that's just something someone else here said. I'm inclined to believe it from several of his posts, but my knowledge is limited enough that someone could skillfully bullshit without me being able to tell.

I think the only reason this case seems so cut and dry is that the defendants are all complete idiots. I recall that during Nick's last stream with his lawyer buddies that one of them said this case was almost unfair because one of his professors in law school said you'd never get a case this straightforward where everything just falls into your lap so neatly.

Naturally, I do my best to verify anything they say by looking up Texas laws and shit, but since @AnOminous has said pretty much the same thing Nick Resetera has said several hours before Nick's streams, I think he either knows his stuff, or maybe he's Nick...

Holy shit just lurk moar newfag

Well, you could've given a new user some insight into this forum's workings and shit, but you chose to be a cunt.

Take a long walk off a short pier and if you make it back to shore I wish for you to live in interesting times.

 

[GenericReviewerDraco]

How does she function?

 

[In Heaven]

How does she function?

Poorly.

 

[Bender]

How does she function?

Maybe she's MALfunctioning?

 

[Slab Bulkhead]

How does she function?

She's just like any other orca. She pays her taxes one leg at a time.

 

[BigDuckEnergy]

Okay, can you guys tell me if you actually know shit about American (preferably Texas) law so I know who I can actually listen to with minimal bullshit? I'm pretty sure @AnOminous knows his shit, and @RodgerDodger probably does too, I'm adding @JosephTX to this list, since he has TX in his name, and I think it was @Kosher Salt that seems to have some insight to the court system too.

Edit: I ain't asking for powerlevels, just a "yeah, I know Texas law" or "yeah, I know American law".

@Shane_Yes_That_One will google fu some shit for you, he won't understand it and most won't be relevant to what you asked but he'll keep trying, the little trooper.