Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly

Who's the most autistic?

  • Mikemikev

    Votes: 401 71.7%
  • Autphag

    Votes: 102 18.2%
  • Luke McKee

    Votes: 6 1.1%
  • Donny Long

    Votes: 50 8.9%

  • Total voters
    559
What sounds more like the Master Race to you:

The guys who were in power for 25 years and lost the only war they started

Or the guys who allegedly control all banks and governments and have survived all attempts to enslave or kill them for 6000+ years?

🤔
It would be an interesting counter-historical to see if the Germans could have won had they not wasted resources on stupid shit like eugenics, the final solution, etc.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: MarineTrainedTard
It would be an interesting counter-historical to see if the Germans could have won had they not wasted resources on stupid shit like eugenics, the final solution, etc.

Don't forget some fucking Nazi engineering whiz kid apparently thought a 1,000 ton armored vehicle with a top speed of 40km/h would ever have been a viable thing, and Hitler himself thought it was a good idea

 
No, you actually are mad. We called you a pedophile cuz you said, in your words, that it's normal for an adult man to find a 15 year old attractive. That's pedo talk.
 
It would be an interesting counter-historical to see if the Germans could have won had they not wasted resources on stupid shit like eugenics, the final solution, etc.

I think one of the dumbest things they did was attempt to invade Russia. Some of Hitler’s advisors warned him that it would be a massive drain on both manpower and resources... but the one balled wonder wanted to show the Russian madman who was boss. Obviously it did not go well for the Germans.

Trust me I'm Jewish.
:story:
 
The study aimed to identify implicit and explicit processes involved in reporting the sexual attractiveness of photographs of the same pubescent girls labeled as either under or within the age of sexual consent in the UK, women, and men. In two studies, 53 and 70 heterosexual men (M age 25.2 and 31.0 years) rated the sexual attractiveness of photographs in each category presented via computer [seeing target photographs of girls labeled as either under- (14-15 years) or within the age of consent (16-17 years)], using a 7-point response box. Ratings in Study 1 were in response to a question asking participants to rate how sexually attractive the person in each photograph was. In Study 2, participants rated how sexually attractive they personally found the target. Response times were also recorded. Several findings were replicated in both studies (although the strength of findings differed). Mean ratings of the sexual attractiveness of the underage girls were lower than those of overage girls and women. In addition, correlations revealed significantly longer responding times when "underage" girls (and men) were rated as more highly sexually attractive. No such relationship emerged with the same girls labeled within the age of consent or women. Overall, these data suggest that men find pubescent girls identified as being under the age of consent sexually attractive, but inhibit their willingness to report this; the greater the attraction, the greater the inhibition.


Simply reporting this study makes you a pedophile apparently. All of the peer reviewers and the publisher must be pedophiles. Science is just one big pedophile conspiracy. 17 year old women exhibit exactly zero attractiveness, until their 18th birthday, when they suddenly become attractive. But only in the USA. This is the best you've got on me? Laughable.
 
I think one of the dumbest things they did was attempt to invade Russia. Some of Hitler’s advisors warned him that it would be a massive drain on both manpower and resources... but the one balled wonder wanted to show the Russian madman who was boss. Obviously it did not go well for the Germans.


:story:

image01.jpg
 
Also, when bad people fight each other, it doesn't make either of them less bad.

Nor does it make it NOT a tactical error if one of them is at a massive disadvantage.

Indeed, Commies are bad, but Hitler was a fucking idiot for looking at the situation on the Western Front and then deciding that attacking Russia was a good move. Why, it's almost like Hitler was an incompetent idiot leading a bunch of degenerate morons!
 

Yes, I’m quite aware of the evils of communism.

I came from a communist country.

That doesn’t make it any less fucking stupid for Hitler to order an invasion of a country with hellish weather, unforgiving terrain and a populace heavily indoctrinated into defending Mother Russia. It was still a fucking idiotic move.

(Question: why is anyone who points out the flaws in fascist ideology automatically called a commie?)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Crow
Back