Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

Gaat said:
Which is why he's a fucking dumbass. Never mind the fact that more cops are likely to shoot him because of his skin color (New York had those speds who killed the dude who was not resisting. All for the audacity of selling cigarettes without paying a license fee).
Click to expand...

If you want to get into it he was killed during an altercation that arose as a result of resisting arrest. You're not going to talk a pissed off police office out of arresting you, justified or not. If it's a case of terrible injustice, I'm sure an ambulance chasing lawyer would love to help you sue the city. But you're going to get arrested and you can either do it easily without additional fanfare or after the cops subdue you and perhaps not as gently as they possibly could.

He should have hauled ass. Jamie's people should have filed a report and left it at that (the first proof of harassment with a police report. Shocker). Instead he spergs out at A.N. and her people catch an exceptional idiot.
Click to expand...

She probably would have if it was the typical "cis-het white male" that all of those idiots like to complain about, but she knows that some other bitch, thirsty for attention and virtue points, would totally call her out for getting a black mentally handicapped person arrested. They would bring up some of the same points you did, only they would outright accuse Marchi of trying to get the guy killed by the police because you know how they like to turn the rhetoric past 11.

It's not a good look for her and if the case starts to look bad for her, the woke crowd is going to to try to disassociate themselves from her and that provides a convenient reason. They'll still claim that Marchi was raped by Vic or some inane crap like that, but they'll say she deserved it for what she did to that poor black disabled person, even in that person doesn't agree with them. Never underestimated the underhandedness of someone that's willing to take offense on the behalf of anyone else when it suits their whims.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Exterminatus, Not A Bug, Syaoran Li and 2 others
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
The Defense filed a response to the MTQ Deposition Notice and Motion to Compel.
Have fun!
Click to expand...

At least he cited some actual case law this time instead of Tumblr and PULL.

I haven't read through the whole thing yet to determine if it's actually any good and not just spaghetti defense, but at least it's less of an abortion than Sargon's suit.
 
5t3n0g0ph3r said:
The Defense filed a response to the MTQ Deposition Notice and Motion to Compel.
Have fun!
Click to expand...
I might be misinterpreting this, but is Casey saying that Vic/Beard need to provide evidence to prove that they shouldn't be deposed first? And seemingly Casey thinks he gets to depose first because he served Vic first? I'm the definition of a law layman, but I don't see what he's trying to with all this. Also trying to rope Rackets and the merch in is hilarious.
 
An interesting (maybe) YT icon to keep an eye out for (that was in that court doc):

776976
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: moocow, Crabbo, Interesting Hypothesis and 6 others
Far Queue said:
At least he cited some actual case law this time instead of Tumblr and PULL.

I haven't read through the whole thing yet to determine if it's actually any good and not just spaghetti defense, but at least it's less of an abortion than Sargon's suit.
Click to expand...

The paragraphs about general rules about discovery were probably cut and pasted from their brief database. The only thing cited for the Rule of Dibsies, which Casey confirms doesn't exist, isn't case law. It's an order from a case in another county that isn't published, isn't precedential, and explicitly states that there is no rule on the order of depositions, but if there were one, it would be that the plaintiff goes first.

776978
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Karl_der_Grosse, Kosher Salt, theworstkindofeurofag and 15 others
AnOminous said:
The paragraphs about general rules about discovery were probably cut and pasted from their brief database.
Click to expand...

Some of that did seem a little boilerplate. I suppose the court doesn't care too much about plagiarism. Wouldn't it be better to officially codify some of that into procedure though so that it's better defined and removes the need for such boilerplate?

Supposing you wanted to settle this dispute over deposition order in a favorable way or at least something that a judge could agree to, do you think Ty proposing that the depositions taking place on three consecutive days with one of the defendants being deposed first, Vic second, and the final defendant third would be a suitable compromise that would come across as reasonable to the judge as well as being difficult for Casey to refuse?

I feel like it's reasonably on the surface but contains a bit of a trap. Although the defendants would have some opportunity to shape their story based on what Vic states, they wouldn't have a lot of time to do so, and they would also have to make it square with the initial deposition or they wind up with sworn statements that are contradictory.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Feels
Reactions: Bootylicious Bootyhole and Botchy Galoop
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back