Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

It's HK-47 said:
620ee424759460747ce931f3c7f2c8f4.png


This is why the phrase, "Don't count your chickens before they're hatched" was penned. I legitimately can't make it further than a few paragraphs into this article without tasting vomit.
Click to expand...

I made it one sentence before it became apparent De Niro was thirsting for that Mueller meat and I wasn't reading his fan fic.

ICametoLurk said:
c02367ab5c59a003f9d5e1656dc2d3414d27d5ba6f494ed288c3215f4430ffcd.png


Get reckted.
Click to expand...

Her grief certainly hasn't impacted her appetite. She's got the body of a three video YT Mukbanger who has AL aspirations.

Reading through a couple of the deranged left's tweets where they basically say the Navy Twitter account is shilling for Trump is unreal. These people are absolutely insane.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Dumb
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, software, Exterminatus and 6 others
heyitsmike said:
The least passionate AOC supporter is more diehard than the most hardcore Trump supporter. They absolutely love her and for what?
Click to expand...
You mean so diehard that she only won due to 90% of her district choosing not to show up because fuck the incumbent?
Sweet and Savoury said:
The one thing I've never been able to get a straight answer to is, should the stars align and somehow Trump gets impeached and Mike "shock the gay away" Pence becomes President...then what?

What's the end goal here?

Do the DNC want Pence to become POTUS? Have they not understood what his platform would be?

Are they so blinded by narccism and impotent rage that they would welcome a hard core right wing religious fundamentalist simply to defeat Trump?

Are they that morally broken that they would openly welcome this event? So long as it means Trump loses?

Holy shit...in my view the progressive left has gone completely insane just becuase Trump did what they told him he could never do


He won.
Click to expand...
In this order:

1. The deranged people have no end goal beyond remove Orange Man. They see him as the worst mix of strawman nazi, sleazy business, and daddy.
2. The more lucid idiots probably see Pence as a far more defeatable guy than Trump given they're used to dealing with strawman fundies.
3. These cunts also hope on some level that the economy collapses because they are so angry that they didn't win they'll take suffering every day due to their entitled desire to win... and the fact they're too rich to feel it usually.
3b. Some of this anger is because they lost money to an unlikeable bitch who will probably die if she campaigns again.
4. Stop fucking calling them "progressive". Progressive implies improvements and is apolitical as a term.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Ghostse, Exterminatus and 10 others
Iwasamwillbe said:
No you don't get it. These wannabe impeachers don't actually want to get anything done, they want to pander to their base of easily led and overemotional morons who always want instant gratification.

When the Republicans in the Senate shut the impeachment proceedings down (assuming those proceedings come in the first place), the Democrats and their media allies can just cry crocodile tears about how partisan and unlawful and unreasonable the Republicans are being.
Click to expand...
So basically the exact same bullshit McCain and the Republicans pulled with repealing Obamacare years ago.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Vault Boy, ForTheHoard and 1 other person
BR55 said:
Two things.
1. Considering how much of a shitshow Dem Senate recruitment efforts have been this cycle I'm seriously doubting their ability to win the Senate.
2. Wait so progressives are actually trying to claim that Dubya won 2000 because of the Clinton Impeachment?!
I mean know most of the TDS crowd were fucking toddlers at the latest during the 2000 election but trying to claim the Impeachment helped push Bush across the finish line is spectacularly moronic.
I mean I must have just imagined Bush losing the Popular Vote and his victory in the decisive State being..."Controversial".
Why ware people so ignorant of their own recent history?:drink:
Click to expand...
Because history education in this country a) does a very poor job instilling a love of history in your average voter, and b) stops at 1990 in public schools at the best of times. I finished public education in the late 00's and my IB History HL course (two years of supposedly college-level history in high school) wrapped up everything from 1970-1990 in two weeks after a frankly disgusting amount of time being spent on the 60's counterculture.

Everything I know about domestic/electoral American politics post-Reagan I had to look up and learn myself, and I only did it because I'm a history/politics sperg.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, AnotherPleb, Shadfan666xxx000 and 9 others
Super-Chevy454 said:
We could call them "backward progressive" or "reverse progressive" since they put their transmission shifter in "reverse" instead of "drive". :story:
Click to expand...

Call them what they are: tyrants. They want to dictate how everyone is allowed to speak, buy, live, or act--and constantly carve out exceptions for themselves.

But people will go on calling them "progressive" because we've been conditioned to subconsciously think of their policies as "progress"--just like we've been conditioned to think of all religious inclination of any extreme (that we don't like) as "fundamentalist" without reference to the original meaning of the word.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Coconut Gun, PrincessHomura and 12 others
Corbin Dallas Multipass said:
Hahaha, can't even get past the first sentence.
"Trump is a child."
"My dad"
Lol who is the child here?

Also DiNiro should run for 2020. Some dumbass actor who makes stupid faces in unfunny movies? Why not, at least he's not a Baldwin.
Click to expand...
I could live with Adam Baldwin running for office, but I doubt he'd want to.

I suspect the idpol/socjus types would lose their shit though.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Kinkshamer, BR55 and 1 other person
Absolutego said:
Because history education in this country a) does a very poor job instilling a love of history in your average voter, and b) stops at 1990 in public schools at the best of times. I finished public education in the late 00's and my IB History HL course (two years of supposedly college-level history in high school) wrapped up everything from 1970-1990 in two weeks after a frankly disgusting amount of time being spent on the 60's counterculture.

Everything I know about domestic/electoral American politics post-Reagan I had to look up and learn myself, and I only did it because I'm a history/politics sperg.
Click to expand...
You were lucky. My High School classes never even got past the Second World War.
As for the "Impeachment helped Bush win" argument the only real effect it had was that Gore kept Clinton at arms length during the campaign.
You could make the argument that if Clinton and Gore had campaigned together more then that would have been enough to flip Ohio or something, or 300 odd votes in Florida for that matter, but thats really reaching.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, AnotherPleb, TowinKarz and 3 others
BR55 said:
You were lucky. My High School classes never even got past the Second World War.
As for the "Impeachment helped Bush win" argument the only real effect it had was that Gore kept Clinton at arms length during the campaign.
You could make the argument that if Clinton and Gore had campaigned together more then that would have been enough to flip Ohio or something, or 300 odd votes in Florida for that matter, but thats really reaching.
Click to expand...
That's why I said "at the best of times". Really, the whole way we teach history is fundamentally incorrect and prone to all sorts of politically minded people trying to crowbar narratives into it, but that's a rant for another thread.

re: Bush v. Gore, the real takeaway from that campaign was that it takes a spectacular presidency for the next candidate to be able to run promising "more of the same" and win. That hasn't happened since H.W. Bush, and the electorate turned on him pretty quickly after electing him. The question for Biden 2020 is whether or not handing the opposition a turn at the wheel for one term is enough to bank on nostalgia for the former administration being enough to get elected on the same old shit.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Exterminatus, Draza and 6 others
Absolutego said:
after a frankly disgusting amount of time being spent on the 60's counterculture.
Click to expand...
This is interesting...why would any student taking history need to learn more about the 60's counterculture than, say, the rise of Ronald Reagan?

It's almost like they're trying to indoctrinate people.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, AnotherPleb, Assorted Nuts and 12 others
Absolutego said:
That's why I said "at the best of times". Really, the whole way we teach history is fundamentally incorrect and prone to all sorts of politically minded people trying to crowbar narratives into it, but that's a rant for another thread.

re: Bush v. Gore, the real takeaway from that campaign was that it takes a spectacular presidency for the next candidate to be able to run promising "more of the same" and win. That hasn't happened since H.W. Bush, and the electorate turned on him pretty quickly after electing him. The question for Biden 2020 is whether or not handing the opposition a turn at the wheel for one term is enough to bank on nostalgia for the former administration being enough to get elected on the same old shit.
Click to expand...
I can only speak for myself but I seriously doubt it.
As much as Obama partisans like to pretend 2016 was all Hillary, not that theres no truth to that, the truth is that Trump's election was very much a rejection of Obama.
Having your only message be "Hey remember Obama?!" isn't very compelling.
Biden dipping hard into White Liberal Self Loathing identity politics sure isn't gonna help either.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: spiritofamermaid, Syaoran Li, Exterminatus and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back