Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

You know what the best part of all this is really? That it is all archived. Every tweet, every video, every interview is going to be preserved so that when this all turns and celebs and political hacks try to walk it back people can throw every word in their face like rotting fruit at the town whore.
That's why the actual 2020 campaign is going to be brutal. Every single person who jumps up to insult or criticize Trump's 2020 campaign is going to be barraged with quotes and videos that they completely botched over the last four years. You know he's petty enough to use every last bullet they handed him, too. It's going to be such a fucking mess; I can't wait.
 
So he's just admitting that the left is violent and doesn't care about freedom of anything and just wants to turn the world into some sort of 1984 Dystopia.
Isn't that what everyone was thinking anyway?
Regardless, that's not how you get more people to vote for your failing party, these tards never learn.
 
Wealth is now a bigger qualifier to be President than it used to be. Funny how the right tried to shame Bernie for being rich, it makes him more electable TBH.

This is kind of a strawman argument. The point wasn't that Sanders was wealthy, it was that he was a hypocrite, advocating for socialism while owning four homes.
 
Hell, just make him the Democrat candidate. I'm sure "Vote for me or die" works in the US just peachy. Technically that's always been everyone's platform anyway but usually just to scare people with climate change or terrorism, not them wanting to personally shoot you in the face.
 
By the way, what is it with the snarky/childish anti-Trump hashtags trending on Twitter recently? I don't follow many political accounts (majority of political accounts I do follow are fairly conservative), and I've been getting bombarded with anti-Trump trends.
It's Twitter. They're hyper-liberals. They hate Trump. They have control over the "now trending" feature and the site's recommendations feature. They're "on the right side of history" and have repeatedly demonstrated a willingness to pull all the levers they have to influence public opinion and punish wrongthink.

The math's not too tough on this one.
 
According to late modern American history, all the great panics seem to only last around only a few years. If you consider the TDS panic as starting in 2016, It's only been 3 ish years. There's still probably at least one more left I think.

Although we are starting to see the cracks form at this stage. A media driven panic can only be driven for so long.

The "End" will be when some source people deem authoritative tells them it's all bullshit or that times have changed, people will see the reality and most will move on, and then we can read the history books about this political shift and laugh heartily.

As for when, can't say exactly, but unless something happens, I think it will be the 2020 election. I see Trump winning and potentially picking up the popular vote due to people having realised the bullshit after 4 years and the democrats will have fractured their support by whomever gets out of the clown car.

Of course I'm probably wrong and dumb tho lol
That's my one hope in 2020: that Trump gets a Reagan like landslide victory.

I want to see how all the "abolish the Electoral College!" types will react.
 
I don't honestly consider California when looking at the popular vote. A state that has laws in place to allow other people to vote for you is trash and shouldn't be counted. By that metric Trump did win the popular vote. Hillary's popular vote win is just California. I really cannot express in words how much I loathe California. So with that in mind, I fully expect the dems to win California by 6-10 million votes in surely not manipulated counts. Thus, Trump is certain to lose the overall popular vote in my mind. However, I also fully expect that only counting the other 49 he should have a better showing than 2016.


Furthermore, California must be destroyed.

Delenda Est.

Etc etc
 
That's my one hope in 2020: that Trump gets a Reagan like landslide victory.

I want to see how all the "abolish the Electoral College!" types will react.
It'll be amazing to watch liberals in places like Nevada (who passed a law recently to force their EC electors cast their votes for the winner of the national popular vote) shit their pants when Trump wins the popular vote and the state goes red as a result of their own dumbass law trying to rig the game.
 
I don't honestly consider California when looking at the popular vote. A state that has laws in place to allow other people to vote for you is trash and shouldn't be counted. By that metric Trump did win the popular vote. Hillary's popular vote win is just California. I really cannot express in words how much I loathe California. So with that in mind, I fully expect the dems to win California by 6-10 million votes in surely not manipulated counts. Thus, Trump is certain to lose the overall popular vote in my mind. However, I also fully expect that only counting the other 49 he should have a better showing than 2016.


Furthermore, California must be destroyed.

Delenda Est.

Etc etc
As it is, they are damned lucky Trump has not dropped a bomb of 'verify your votes or we will refuse to seat your Congresscritters or certify your electors'.

They deserve to be demoted back to territory status for a few years, minimum, just because of their financial fuckups.
 
This is interesting...why would any student taking history need to learn more about the 60's counterculture than, say, the rise of Ronald Reagan?

It's almost like they're trying to indoctrinate people.
Because their Boomer teachers were in the prime of their lives when the counter culture happened and they're still unable to grow the fuck up out of that period in their lives, so they're trying to mold their students into what they were on crack. You know how moms put their toddlers in the beauty pageant life in a bid to create a better mini version of themselves for the sole purpose of reaping the benefits while not personally having to deal with the consequences like getting molested? That's kinda the same deal here
 
As it is, they are damned lucky Trump has not dropped a bomb of 'verify your votes or we will refuse to seat your Congresscritters or certify your electors'.

They deserve to be demoted back to territory status for a few years, minimum, just because of their financial fuckups.
I want someone to challenge a lot of these laws in California.

This is the example that pops out in my mind.

Republicans winning seats and then all of a sudden, hey look we found votes! Boy aren't the democrats really good at those get someone else to vo-I mean get out the vote drives!

Utter trash. Everyday that passes I find new reasons to loathe that state and the people in it. At this point I'm absolutely convinced that California is being arranged to have its vote counts utterly inflated to 3rd world degrees in order to facilitate that popular vote compact. Can't lose a popular vote if you stuff the ballots can you?

Jesus the more I think of it the more appalled I get. It was inconsequential to me when they were letting illegals vote in their elections because it only affected their elections. I was breathing a sigh of relief that it looked like the 2020 census not counting illegals would keep California from adding a comical number of electoral votes to the state. But this interstate popular vote compact in addition to the way California has been arranging itself to just stuff millions upon millions of illegitimate votes for one party is horrific. God I hope I'm wrong because this is true civil war threatening shit.
 
It'll be amazing to watch liberals in places like Nevada (who passed a law recently to force their EC electors cast their votes for the winner of the national popular vote) shit their pants when Trump wins the popular vote and the state goes red as a result of their own dumbass law trying to rig the game.

That got Veto'ed because the Governor apparently isn't a drooling retard who would like to win elections moving forward.

EDIT - I think if some states manage to pass something like this, the people who signed the bill will have a hard time getting re-elected.

 
Republicans winning seats and then all of a sudden, hey look we found votes! Boy aren't the democrats really good at those get someone else to vo-I mean get out the vote drives!

That's not new. The 2000 election in Florida was when we first noticed. They kept recounting and recounting and oh look a whole closet full of ballots we didn't count and they're all for Gore whodathunk so let's add 'em in this time.

That got Veto'ed because the Governor apparently isn't a drooling exceptional individual who would like to win elections moving forward.

From the article said:
“Once effective, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact could diminish the role of smaller states like Nevada in national electoral contests and force Nevada’s electors to side with whoever wins the nationwide popular vote, rather than the candidate Nevadans choose...In cases like this, where Nevada’s interests could diverge from the interests of large states, I will always stand up for Nevada.”

About damn time.
 
Back