- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
Careercow Jamie Lynn Marchi / Jamie Perez / marchimark / She Devil - Wants Vic's head and balls, but not his papers; Cucked by a Chicken Sandwich
- Thread starter Army Burger
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
To be fair, it was sgsami or whatever his name is jumping the gun on something that's not an unheard of occurrence. They can have their win on that since Casey Erick got pimpslapped in court by Chupp and Beard.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
It's pretty much a no-brainer to at least ask for the case to be dismissed and the defense's legal fees to be paid by the plaintiff. They don't really have anything to lose by asking, so there's no reason not to... it doesn't even cost much of anything; they're filing a response anyway. It's just one additional paragraph.
I wouldn't read too much into that specific request.
- Joined
- May 13, 2019
I'm cracking out this VINTAGE, AGED, Tweet, cause this was made about, may or april, two months or so into this mess. I could bloody "taste" the bullshit in this tweet, the GALL to imply that she and everyone involved "didn't want this" Yes, I know getting angry and mad on the internet, but this is downright insulting the fans' intelligence with this statement. No, you people wanted this, you used the fanbase to get the results you wanted, and then tossed away the "undesirables" when they went "hey wait a minute..."
And also let's laugh at the hypocrisy that she got the same type of lawyer as the one she slandered and dragged through the mud. What was it? "Youtube Lawyer, who used to work in a shipping crate" hires a "Mall Lawyer." I just... it really does feel like her "Tough GURL" act is essentially Ron's ": )"
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
What a hypocritical cunt. She looks down on that kind of person, but when she needs her bacon pulled out of the fire, who does she go to? There is absolutely nothing wrong with a small time lawyer who starts their own small firm, and has a modest operation, and who is there for a reasonable price for people who suddenly find themselves in need of legal help, like Jamie Marchi for instance.
And that mall lawyer is a goddamn genius compared to that utter fucking idiot "Super Lawyer" big time Dallas lawyer who is taking MoRonica for a very expensive ride and filed amateurish, laughable garbage that he's lucky the judge never looked at.
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2014
I don't think that these chucklefucks have fully realised that they're not on the same side yet. They might all be anti-Vic, but it's everyone for themselves now whether they want it that way or not.
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2019
Really infuriating how they seemed to think they were going to do this, and then just go on about their lives thinking nobody would question it or fight back. Turns out the people in the fanbase these idiots tried to shun were the ones that built that warchest to bury these pieces of shit.
Wonder if her lawyer knows all of the story or just read the lawsuit and she said "I didn't do it" and that's all he has to work with.
U
UA 674
Guest
kiwifarms.net
I knew that shit was gonna happen, until you get either a statement from Funi or anything like that, don't believe what some faggot like Perfection or SGSAMI says, they are stupid fucks just trying to get clicks and don't bother verifying shit.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
I wouldn't talk shit because decent lawyers in Texas work out of literal converted crackshacks on the edges of Downtown, hell the top criminal defense lawyer in Montgomery county (pop 550k, directly north of Houston) works out of a small former 1920s store front
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2019
We got bullshit-o mall security ninja and now we got mall lawyer.
I live for this shit.
I live for this shit.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2018
mall lawyer did nothing wrong and his strange defense sounded pretty well researched and interesting to be easyly dismissed. Thats alot of money vic has to burn if Ty has to give a good answer.
showing ty that he is hard working and not stupid goes along way when it comes to making a good deal.
- Joined
- May 3, 2019
At this point I'm just waiting to see how Marchi's going to try to save face in her inevitable public retraction.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
All Ty has to do is cite the actual rule. A trial court isn't going to go off on a theoretical argument and break the rule. I think he's fishing for an appeal on the issue and if so, he might raise the argument in every case he tries. He's written law review articles and actually teaches CLE to other lawyers, and does not appear to be pulling this argument out of his ass.
Law review articles:
Burton, Johnson & Burton, The Sound of Inevitability: The Doctrine of Inevitable Disclosure of Trade Secrets Comes to Texas, 44 Tex. J. Bus. L. 103 (2011).
Johnson, Samuel H., Note, Who We Really Are: On the Need for the United States to Adopt the European Paradigm for Identity Fraud Protection, 15 Currents: Int'l Trade L.J. 123 (2006). Note: he was licensed in 2008, so would have been a student when he wrote this, as are most authors of law journal articles entitled "Note."
Someone said on Nick's stream that they'd found a case where Johnson made his punitive damages argument, but I haven't been able to locate such a case.
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2018
I'm confused by why he's arguing the validity of damages that haven't yet been incurred or assessed. In my mind the sequence goes claim, answer, evidence, arguments, judgment, damages. It's like he's going "well, let's just get this on the table for the damages phase right away. We're probably gonna need it"
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2019
Could it just be it's a pet legal matter he has, and put it into the answer on the off chance it could become relevant on appeal or something? Seemed like a weird thing to insert in an otherwise solid answer.
Seems like a win-win for him. It shouldn't hurt Marchi's case, and on the off chance this goes to a higher court he finally gets his chance to debate it.
altleftleftleft
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 2, 2019
I think because he knows that no matter how well constructed his defense is, he will most likely not be able to get Marchi completely off the hook. His goal is to mitigate damages. I'm reminded of how Nick said that the adage "lawyers lose 50% of their cases" is because lawyers redefine winning depending on the particular case.
We got bullshit-o mall security ninja and now we got mall lawyer.
I live for this shit.
Mall Lawyer and Casey are basically adapting that scene in anime where it turns out that the henchman was more powerful than the villain who was built up as a big bad.
edit: I'm surprised that mall lawyer hasn't managed to get Marchi off twitter. I laughed so hard when nick reported that Casey Erik responded to the judge that he's tried to get Ron to stop tweeting. Those must have been some fun conversations. Part of me thinks he's not putting his full effort into the case because Ron and Monica are giving him no incentive due to their behavior.
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2014
It does seem like a pet legal interest of his but I also wonder if he'd floating it now as a warning balloon that the costs will keep running after judgement. That would still be consistent with the idea that Marchi is probably going to want to settle before this runs its full course.
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2018
He's not putting his full effort in because he went to school for 6 to 8 years to become a lawyer, not a tard wrangler.
"They came to me as a lawyer because they have a legal problem and I am the expert in legalities. I told that fucking idiot to stop tweeting, and he didn't. What the fuck do you want me to do? Confiscate his phone like I'm his homeroom teacher?"