Inactive Pretty Ugly Little Liars: Weeb Wars Edition - Stupid thoughts from stupid THOTs

senpaichimps.png


Chimp out from Senpai
 
Also, is anyone following the resetera thread on Vic Mignogna? Just took a look and they're galaxy brain takes are sometimes more delusional and idiotic than even PULL, if that's even possible. And seems more active too, since PULL has turned into a depressing ghost town.

View attachment 780315
View attachment 780313
View attachment 780314
View attachment 780317
View attachment 780318
View attachment 780319
View attachment 780322
Another good site to laugh at is Kanzenshuu. They have an entire Vic thread and they are populated by some notable KV thugs.
 
Another good site to laugh at is Kanzenshuu. They have an entire Vic thread and they are populated by some notable KV thugs.

Including the owner, Mike LaBrie (VegettoEX). Mike, you sadden me in what you have become. Banning people for "for lack of empathy for survivors."
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
Okay you smart lawyer people you prove to me Senpai wasn't at those cons. Prove me to me he never touched girls and hurt his coworkers. Where is your evidence that he never did those things? Five people PM'd me over the week telling me how you're a predator. No, you can't have their names or their contact info. They've suffered enough at your hands.

So prove to me you never touched them, ever. Remember falsifying evidence is a big no-no.

Oh and big hint: Making a PULL post saying you didn't do it with no actual proof isn't evidence.
 
Including the owner, Mike LaBrie (VegettoEX). Mike, you sadden me in what you have become. Banning people for "for lack of empathy for survivors."
I've been trying to nail his dox down. I know he lives in New Jersey and whitepages (whitepages just isn't enough) points towards Monmouth Junction and I've been building off of that with no success. However, I did find out that his wife's name is Meredith thanks to his bio on Kanzenshuu and the TFS wiki. From simple math from his bio, he was born in 1982.
 

Before any of those stories would be useful to the defendants' lawyers, it would need to be established that both Vic and the accusers were at the cons mentioned. Unless both of those things can be proven, the rest of the poster's claims are irrelevant. Vic's attendance or absence can be verified by both his own records and records maintained by the cons, as well as contemporaneous external records. The poster's attendance might be harder to prove unless they have photographic evidence of attendance. Merely buying a ticket is not evidence of attendance.

"Gotcha" games on the internet prove nothing. The only "game" which matters is the one playing out in court and right now only the parties themselves and their lawyers know what can actually be proven.

"Vic has to be guilty because people on the internet said he is" is an absurd position to take. "Vic has to be innocent because people on the internet said he is" is an equally absurd position to take. Apparently horrible people can be innocent and apparently nice people can be guilty. None of us know the people involved well enough to assess their credibility. We won't even have a chance to assess them objectively until discovery is complete.

There's really no point in getting invested in a specific outcome. This is going to take quite a while to play out.
 
Why did this dude never get into internet bloodsports? With this level of ability to misunderstand how logic works and the propensity to chimp the fuck out on a dime they would have fit right in. :story:

And SenpaiSaw does have a certain ring to it...
They're too re.tarded for IBS
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Botchy Galoop
"Vic has to be guilty because people on the internet said he is" is an absurd position to take. "Vic has to be innocent because people on the internet said he is" is an equally absurd position to take. Apparently horrible people can be innocent and apparently nice people can be guilty. None of us know the people involved well enough to assess their credibility. We won't even have a chance to assess them objectively until discovery is complete.

There's really no point in getting invested in a specific outcome. This is going to take quite a while to play out.

While this is true and a sensible position to hold, I don't believe Vic is innocent simply because people on the internet say so. I believe it because not a single one of the claims made against him either match the level of assault, or have been actively debunked. Not one. When this first started, people here presumed Vic was guilty because of the amount of rumours and accusations that were being bandied about. It was presumed that the sheer number of claims meant there must be something to them. But as time went on and the usual digging was done, all substance to all of the accusations fell away. None of them had anything to support them, and most of them were demonstrably lies.

The few stories that were trotted out time and again as their strongest evidence didn't hold up, and now every single time the anti-Vic side is asked for this information they talk about mountains of evidence, dozens of claims, years of accusations ... and no actual, specific event. The best they have, the absolute strongest cases they've made against him, are that he's a hugger, and that at vague, unspecified times he has made a couple of his coworkers uncomfortable (but not in a way that constitutes assault, or even most definitions of harassment).

The few times they don't get huffy about believing victims and actually put up this evidence they gloat about, all they have are anonymous forums and Tumblr posts (which are, yes, also mostly 'friend of a friend' posts, despite what PULL says) which not only are inadmissible, but also have the authenticity of a burn book.

So I don't expect swift justice, but I do have a preferred outcome. Because the Farms is big on evidence, and all the evidence - all of it - points to this being a smear job directed at a man who is likely not a saint, but is not at all the rapist/pedophile/homophobe/molester/creeper they say he is. Not only that, but there's evidence to suggest that it all came to head due to jealousy, greed and for personal gain.

So, yes. We don't have all the facts. But the facts we do have - and that this information that will 'blow the case wide open and make everyone see Vic is a monster' apparently was important enough to share on Twitter in February, but once it was disproven and the courts became involved is suddenly something only shareable through proper legal channels - are overwhelmingly pro-Vic. So I am as well.
 
Screenshot_2019-06-01 Vic Mignogna(5).png

Lol "No one wants to talk about it anymore" well maybe people should have thought about that when they went and tried to BURY a person's career and reputation in public medium. Court of Public Opinion only works when you have concrete evidence, otherwise you WILL be creating a huge mess with the backlash when you don't "put up" and are told to "shut up". That's what happens when people are caught in their lie, they have to PRODUCE the evidence if they want to play a game of public opinion, otherwise you are fucked.
 
View attachment 781916
Lol "No one wants to talk about it anymore" well maybe people should have thought about that when they went and tried to BURY a person's career and reputation in public medium. Court of Public Opinion only works when you have concrete evidence, otherwise you WILL be creating a huge mess with the backlash when you don't "put up" and are told to "shut up". That's what happens when people are caught in their lie, they have to PRODUCE the evidence if they want to play a game of public opinion, otherwise you are fucked.
"No one wants to talk about it anymore", say the people who keep trying to ruin Vic's life.
 
"No one wants to talk about it anymore", say the people who keep trying to ruin Vic's life.
Well you see Burg, they obviously don't want to talk about it anymore because it should have already been resolved with Vic dead in a gutter somewhere. But because everyone who isn't them dared to waste everyone's time with this whole "proper procedure and demands of evidence" thing, PULL has been dragged back into the discussion and have no choice but to jerk off in a circle about how it's pointless because every look is a bad look for Vic.
 
View attachment 781916
Lol "No one wants to talk about it anymore" well maybe people should have thought about that when they went and tried to BURY a person's career and reputation in public medium. Court of Public Opinion only works when you have concrete evidence, otherwise you WILL be creating a huge mess with the backlash when you don't "put up" and are told to "shut up". That's what happens when people are caught in their lie, they have to PRODUCE the evidence if they want to play a game of public opinion, otherwise you are fucked.
"We messed up his career, stop talking about it already, gawd"
 
Okay you smart lawyer people you prove to me Senpai wasn't at those cons. Prove me to me he never touched girls and hurt his coworkers. Where is your evidence that he never did those things? Five people PM'd me over the week telling me how you're a predator. No, you can't have their names or their contact info. They've suffered enough at your hands.

So prove to me you never touched them, ever. Remember falsifying evidence is a big no-no.

Oh and big hint: Making a PULL post saying you didn't do it with no actual proof isn't evidence.
Senpai trash raped a new born baby, I tried to stop the bitch but she threatened me with rape as well.
 
Screenshot_2019-06-01 Vic Mignogna(6).png

I'm sorry you lack eyes or a brain to realize you are doing nothing but parroting what we say without realizing that you ignore ACTUAL evidence is out there.
 
View attachment 782015
I'm sorry you lack eyes or a brain to realize you are doing nothing but parroting what we say without realizing that you ignore ACTUAL evidence is out there.

How is anyone, including Casey, supposed to prove that "both parties were at the cons" (or not at them) when nobody knows who the anonymous accusers are? We could check the con guest lists, I guess.

The person who posted the Dragon Con story was pro-Vic but it doesn't matter - he wasn't at that con anymore than he was at the other two cons which "accusers" posted stories about.


782031



Monica and Jamie were both guests but Vic wasn't.

Dragon con 2012, you say?

Guest list for Dragon Con 2012 is here. Vic isn't on it.


What about Youmacon 2007?

782046


Nope. No Vic there either.

 
Last edited:
View attachment 782015
I'm sorry you lack eyes or a brain to realize you are doing nothing but parroting what we say without realizing that you ignore ACTUAL evidence is out there.

Every time she types, my brain hurts trying to read her response.

IT'S BEEN MONTHS NOW, and Kickvic hasn't been able to provide a shred of evidence to pursue a case and convict him, even after his wrongful termination. Even after 20 years.

IT'S BEEN MONTHS NOW, and Vic was able to procure enough evidence with proper authentication to pursue a case against multiple parties with multiple causes of actions.

See how stupid you look now?
But you've always looked stupid.
It's not a good look. 👀
 
On proof;

Last year, I got so upset by one of these rumors about me being drunk. Now, how many cameras and videos are at an anime convention? Hundreds, right? At least. Hundreds. If I am drunk and stumbling around as much as they say, how come there's no video? Everyone's shooting video all the time, but there isn't any.

So, you know what I did one time? I had a friend of mine go on one of these websites and say, "You guys are being hurtful and cruel and lying and I challenge anyone to produce any video evidence of Vic being drunk at all and I'll give you hundred dollars" and I've literally set up a PayPal account. You remember this? I set up a PayPal account called VicIsADrunk.com. I did it. And I put a hundred bucks of my own money in there and it's still there because there isn't any video evidence. It's never happened. Do you see how fun this is? You're offering someone a hundred bucks and there is no proof. They have no proof. They just like to say mean things about people.


This is from 2010, by the way.
 
Back