- Joined
- Apr 25, 2015
The BCHRT website:
Do you know if JY might also be "X" in "X v Hot Mess"?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The BCHRT website:
Yes he is.Do you know if JY might also be "X" in "X v Hot Mess"?
Edit: Now that I've finished the entire thing, there's some real spooky shit in here such as referring to women who wouldn't service Jonathan as "radicalized" and opining about a "pattern" of radicalized women running small businesses, as if there is something out of the ordinary about not wanting to touch Jonathan Yaniv's testicles.
Going to a boat mechanic and demanding that they fix your car is absurd. It seems obvious... but then again, Canada.Why don't these salons argue that they can't wax his balls because they're not trained to wax balls? Wouldn't a defense centering on the fact that ball waxing requires a different technique be the most effective one?
Going to a boat mechanic and demanding that they fix your car is absurd. It seems obvious... but then again, Canada.
Amazing. Only read the first one so far but this is shockingly well-reasoned stuff from the tribunal. It's just fortunate for the waxing salons that the tribunal member handling this seems pretty clued in, despite also being a very typical Trans Right Acvist-styled SJW. How did you access this?
Edit: Now that I've finished the entire thing, there's some real spooky shit in here such as referring to women who wouldn't service Jonathan as "radicalized" and opining about a "pattern" of radicalized women running small businesses, as if there is something out of the ordinary about not wanting to touch Jonathan Yaniv's testicles. Further, much of the decision against Jonathan is based around procedural bullshit, calling out Jonathan's apparently racist comments in the various documents and how often he filed and withdrew complaints. The decision doesn't seem to actually make any findings regarding if these women should be forced to touch Jonathan's testicles or not if they want to continue running their business, and includes some bizarre bullshit like comments about how waxing services are "gender-affirming." This essentially implies that if someone who didn't make racist comments and didn't file a dozen complaints at once had tried to get some cash out of this, that it would have worked. Fortunately, the court seems to be onto Jonathan and sick of his shit in general, so I doubt any payout is going to be made until another troon comes along and tries to run this scam. The general tenor of the document seems to point in the direction of being Jonathan's side re: if he deserves to force women to wax his testicles, they just didn't like the way he filed his paperwork.
Canada is actual garbage.
They know.
View attachment 784838
View attachment 784839
There's just so much bizarre shit in here...how would Jonathan even begin to think he could get away with this claim?
View attachment 784840
This bit makes me wonder if Laser Cut's lawyers pulled a Ty Beard and had their team use KF for research...
View attachment 784842
Racial element.
View attachment 784843
A terrifying sentence implying that women who don't want to handle cocks and balls are "radicalized"
View attachment 784845
Laser Cut called Jonathan a dude because Jonathan called Jonathan a dude.
View attachment 784848
JY mostly didn't get awarded costs because he couldn't stop himself from being a stupid fucking racist
View attachment 784849
Weirdo secret court judge is mad that Jonathan revealed something that was said during the super-secret portion of the secret court.
View attachment 784851
Jonathan has agreed not to file anymore complaints until the current ones are resolved.
View attachment 784853
In regards to Jonathan withdrawing complaints as soon as someone fights back, the tribunal judge (or whatever) calls him out on his excuse.
View attachment 784859
Jonathan has to pay for wasting the court's time and being a vexatious-ish.
View attachment 784860
T2 diabetics typically take Metformin and an assortment of other oral meds unless none of those are controlling sugar any more. Insulin takes careful planning and discipline, which I don't really see JY adhering to.The fact he’s not copping to the insulin he obviously needs and takes makes me suspect that insulin, a hormone, is his “HRT.”
Wonder if his “breast growth meds and shit ton of vites” is literally just Soylent.
Amazing. Only read the first one so far but this is shockingly well-reasoned stuff from the tribunal. It's just fortunate for the waxing salons that the tribunal member handling this seems pretty clued in, despite also being a very typical Trans Right Acvist-styled SJW. How did you access this?
Edit: Now that I've finished the entire thing, there's some real spooky shit in here such as referring to women who wouldn't service Jonathan as "radicalized" and opining about a "pattern" of radicalized women running small businesses, as if there is something out of the ordinary about not wanting to touch Jonathan Yaniv's testicles. Further, much of the decision against Jonathan is based around procedural bullshit, calling out Jonathan's apparently racist comments in the various documents and how often he filed and withdrew complaints. The decision doesn't seem to actually make any findings regarding if these women should be forced to touch Jonathan's testicles or not if they want to continue running their business, and includes some bizarre bullshit like comments about how waxing services are "gender-affirming." This essentially implies that if someone who didn't make racist comments and didn't file a dozen complaints at once had tried to get some cash out of this, that it would have worked. Fortunately, the court seems to be onto Jonathan and sick of his shit in general, so I doubt any payout is going to be made until another troon comes along and tries to run this scam. The general tenor of the document seems to point in the direction of being Jonathan's side re: if he deserves to force women to wax his testicles, they just didn't like the way he filed his paperwork.
Canada is actual garbage.
They know.
View attachment 784838
View attachment 784839
There's just so much bizarre shit in here...how would Jonathan even begin to think he could get away with this claim?
View attachment 784840
This bit makes me wonder if Laser Cut's lawyers pulled a Ty Beard and had their team use KF for research...
View attachment 784842
Racial element.
View attachment 784843
A terrifying sentence implying that women who don't want to handle cocks and balls are "radicalized"
View attachment 784845
Laser Cut called Jonathan a dude because Jonathan called Jonathan a dude.
View attachment 784848
JY mostly didn't get awarded costs because he couldn't stop himself from being a stupid fucking racist
View attachment 784849
Weirdo secret court judge is mad that Jonathan revealed something that was said during the super-secret portion of the secret court.
View attachment 784851
Jonathan has agreed not to file anymore complaints until the current ones are resolved.
View attachment 784853
In regards to Jonathan withdrawing complaints as soon as someone fights back, the tribunal judge (or whatever) calls him out on his excuse.
View attachment 784859
Jonathan has to pay for wasting the court's time and being a vexatious-ish.
View attachment 784860
It's a shame that the salons don't all band together and hire a decent lawyer to put a foot on Tampon Johnny's neck.Released 05/30/19
JY v Various Waxing Salons
It's 26 pages and truly exceptional. Happy reading!
Edit: He has 8 more BCHRT Hearings scheduled in the next 90 days.
View attachment 784828
It's a shame that the salons don't all band together and hire a decent lawyer to put a foot on Tampon Johnny's neck.
It doesn't say "radicalized" it says "racialized" which doesn't make much sense but is at least somewhat less disturbing in context.
Released 05/30/19
JY v Various Waxing Salons
It's 26 pages and truly exceptional. Happy reading!
Edit: He has 8 more BCHRT Hearings scheduled in the next 90 days.
View attachment 784828
It doesn't say "radicalized" it says "racialized" which doesn't make much sense but is at least somewhat less disturbing in context.
Racialized is the most woke way to talk about people of colour. Because race, like sex, is not in anyway physical and entirely a social construct. So brown people are not brown because they are brown, but because white people say so. Just like males are not males because they are males, they are males because terves say so.