- Joined
- Nov 13, 2018
Almost as if /pol/ isn’t parody.I laughed for a good two minutes about his handle literally being @gaywonk. The gay wonk. It's like if /pol/ created a bad parody of a Vox writer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Almost as if /pol/ isn’t parody.I laughed for a good two minutes about his handle literally being @gaywonk. The gay wonk. It's like if /pol/ created a bad parody of a Vox writer.
Funnily enough, Crowder absolutely doesn't depend on Youtube ad rev. The Youtube content is paid for by the Mug Club/Blaze TV subscriptions and merch purchases.
The only people being hurt by this adpocalypse are perfectly innocent channels and moreso Vox than Crowder.
Things got spicy. The blue checkmarks are realizing that Youtube's scorched earth policy is fucking them in the ass
View attachment 787441
What made Youtube do it in the first place? Think real hard, you might find the answer in your own post....errors on their part were @youtube, not him (Carlos Maza)
Giant Faggot said:I don't understand how Youtube is still so bad at this.
Because automated system don't know if the 14 words being recited is some basement dwelling nazi or a documentary on Hitler, you pathetic cunt.
He knew this would happen, everyone knows large platforms cannot be consistent, as algorithms will always either have way too many false positives or they'll be ineffective, and manual control is impossible. But he doesn't care, he said Crowder's been harassing him for 2 years but he only brought it up now, and with massive media support, why? This dumb shit is simply about money, "power" and "winning culture war".
And, of course, Crowder is a boring hack, his content is shit, and he's not gonna be affected by this too much. Idiotic shitshow, all of it.
It is that lispy queer’s fault. He’s the one who thought he could pull a WSJ and bully YouTube into censoring someone he disliked.Things got spicy. The blue checkmarks are realizing that Youtube's scorched earth policy is fucking them in the ass
View attachment 787441
I'm sure they get paid way more than these "journalists" at sites like Vox and Vice (they've been paid terrible from what I heard).My favorite thing out of all of this was when Carlos bitched about LGBT people working for Youtube and he actually asked them "why don't you stop working for them and just leave?" Now I don't know how much people get paid to work for Youtube (if he's talking about Youtubers or other people) but maybe they can't afford to, and I'm guessing that dumbass gets paid more to work for Vox.
This is the exact kind of thing that some dumbass rich person would say who has no idea about real life.
I'm sure they get paid way more than these "journalists" at sites like Vox and Vice (they've been paid terrible from what I heard).
He knew this would happen, everyone knows large platforms cannot be consistent, as algorithms will always either have way too many false positives or they'll be ineffective, and manual control is impossible.
Wouldn't surprise me if the man and many of his supporters think of "algorithms" as pure magic. They were responsible for making Crowder, Shapiro, the Lobster Room Cleaner, etc. popular and thus they can make it all go away like they were 19th century wizard shit.Lol, the moron complained about an innocent person's content being demonetized when it's his fault that Youtube did a knee jerk reacting due to his constant bitching. Algorithms can't solve everything with 100 percent accuracy when it comes to social media and it just makes things worse at times. Youtube might as well only allow the corporate channels and the creators they approve of on their platform now and get it over it (and change their name to something else since there is no You in Youtube).
Jeez, this guy really is the definition of a manchild.He’s only temporarily demonetized.
Carlos is SEETHING over itView attachment 786990