Megathread TERFs / Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists / Gender Critical Feminists - ft. r/GenderCritical & related reddits, Mancheeze, Cathy Brennan, GCDad, RadFHarva, Jamie Shupe, etc; "Gender Critical Feminism is Homophobic" - Cathy Brennan, 2019.

I don't know if anyone mentioned leah tverly, but I will.

this is some of her messages that she had with kalvin garrah.
775676

775669

775672

775674


and this how she looks like.

775681
 

Attachments

  • 1559070242733.png
    1559070242733.png
    253.5 KB · Views: 379
  • 1559070385465.png
    1559070385465.png
    253.5 KB · Views: 326
Last edited:
Nothing shows mental stability more than contacting a random dude on the internet and screaming "YOU ARE A WOMAN" in all caps multiple times at them :story:

But remember, it's the trannies that are the mentally unwell ones!

Daily reminder that TERFs were never the rational party in the tranny wars
attention.png
period.png
 

Attachments

  • attention.png
    attention.png
    239.4 KB · Views: 387
  • period.png
    period.png
    128.9 KB · Views: 398
You know, I always found it weird that a lot of them go full edgelord mode by saying "HAHA YOU'LL NEVER BE A WOMAN I HAVE A REAL VAGINA AND XX CHROMOSOMES AND YOU DON'T" and then instantly backtrack off that pedestal when they start talking about sex-based oppression, screaming about periods, and so on and so forth. Like, you know, "antipathetic confrontational asshole telling people to off themselves" and "professional victim getting offended whenever someone makes a joke of their suffering" don't really go well together, it just screams insecurity and cope mechanisms.
 
You know, I always found it weird that a lot of them go full edgelord mode by saying "HAHA YOU'LL NEVER BE A WOMAN I HAVE A REAL VAGINA AND XX CHROMOSOMES AND YOU DON'T" and then instantly backtrack off that pedestal when they start talking about sex-based oppression, screaming about periods, and so on and so forth. Like, you know, "antipathetic confrontational asshole telling people to off themselves" and "professional victim getting offended whenever someone makes a joke of their suffering" don't really go well together, it just screams insecurity and cope mechanisms.

I like Cathy Brennan because she mostly just sticks to looking like a trucker and constantly doxing troons.
 
You know, I always found it weird that a lot of them go full edgelord mode by saying "HAHA YOU'LL NEVER BE A WOMAN I HAVE A REAL VAGINA AND XX CHROMOSOMES AND YOU DON'T" and then instantly backtrack off that pedestal when they start talking about sex-based oppression, screaming about periods, and so on and so forth. Like, you know, "antipathetic confrontational asshole telling people to off themselves" and "professional victim getting offended whenever someone makes a joke of their suffering" don't really go well together, it just screams insecurity and cope mechanisms.
The way they go full Mean Girls on women who are sympathetic to part of their cause but are otherwise conservative, or women they deem to be "handmaidens," is another interesting facet to their shifting self-presentation.
 
The way they go full Mean Girls on women who are sympathetic to part of their cause but are otherwise conservative, or women they deem to be "handmaidens," is another interesting facet to their shifting self-presentation.

And their constant shift between ignoring FtMs, then being all weepy and sad for "wayward lesbian sisters", to being furious at those dirty misogynist gender traitors. It's always whatever is most convenient.

I like Cathy Brennan because she mostly just sticks to looking like a trucker and constantly doxing troons.

oh yeah speaking of Cathy I have an update on her (and my own opinion I guess)

She's called out r/GenderCritical and their homophobia. And so a thread has been made on tranny subreddit gendercynical, and one of the local trannies over there linked a search of Bug's twitter.

Here are some caps
cathy1.PNG
cathy2.PNG
cathy3.PNG
cathy4.PNG
cathy5.PNG

All in all I think this is pretty based. I want Bug-senpai to continue this warpath.
 
Martina is a lesbian who has been out since the early 80s, a time when it was more difficult to be out than today, and has been fighting against homophobic bigotry for a long time. How can it be surprising to Posie Parker (the person Cathy Brennan was referring to) that she doesn't want to ally herself with an anti gay group?
 
Pretty sure tigtog is a regular woman who forgot that radical feminism doesn't center men or sees a metaphysical reason they should be considered female. Rather, men are welcomed as allies in radical feminism [https://thefifthcolumnnews.com/2016/01/liberal-v-radical-feminism/ ; http://archive.li/2z02P ] when they adhere to radical feminist principles and if they respect that women will meet and gather separately from men when appropriate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TERF

A good example of a radical feminist ally (there aren't many!) is Robert Jensen a UofT prof who recently published the book Radical Feminism for Men.

It seems that women are meant by men to be the only subjugated group that is not allowed to exclude their subjugators. Why do tims oppose this with such vehemence? http://www.zoeblunt.ca/2013/09/22/when-is-it-ok-for-social-justice-groups-to-exclude-people/ ; http://archive.li/B8ikT

Added:
Martina is a lesbian who has been out since the early 80s, a time when it was more difficult to be out than today, and has been fighting against homophobic bigotry for a long time. How can it be surprising to Posie Parker (the person Cathy Brennan was referring to) that she doesn't want to ally herself with an anti gay group?
Who is it that belongs to an anti-gay group? Posie is pro-lesbian and frequently allies with lesbians such as Venice Allen. She's pro gay from what one sees on her FB.

Cathy, like many lesbians, is a lesbian separatist (as far as I can tell) and doesn't see it as possible to ally with bi or straight women which is not surprising considering how non-lesbian women have treated lesbians.

Other lesbians do find value in sisterhood with other women of other sexual orientations. Due to small numbers of radical lesbian feminists, this is happening more now. One such example is Vancouver Rape Relief and Women's Shelter though this has always been a group of mixed sexual orientations, they continue to encourage unity of all women.
 
Last edited:
Why is being a lesbian so important to them? Do they think lesbianism is a choice? If you suck cock you're a gender traitor or something? I don't get it.
 
Why is being a lesbian so important to them? Do they think lesbianism is a choice? If you suck cock you're a gender traitor or something? I don't get it.
We actually have a thread that shows the extensive display of this kind of person, where lesbian women bash bisexual women for daring to "taint themselves with cock", aka the nice gals thread. Some of them are completely irrational about it and equate women not disclosing their bisexual status with "rape by deception". A lot of lesbians are just completely unhinged because of their aversion towards men.

Political sexuality is not quite the same thing but it's just the same kind of stupidity. Political/Ideological sexuality shouldn't be a thing yet these women somehow found a way to get there.
 
Update on the Meghan Murphy lolsuit against Twitter, that TERFs are awfully quiet about for some reason. TERFs claim to be incredibly interested in equal rights and justice for all, but they don't seem to care much how the law actually works in practice. Looking up troons on reddit is so much more fun than trying to understand the actual nuts and bolts of free speech rights.

Where the lolsuit is now: Twitter defended their anti-SLAPP motion and their demurrer, Meghan's Breitbart lawyers opposed their arguments and the latest is that Meghan's lawyers are trying to submit new evidence showing that Twitter has targetted users other than Meghan Murphy with arbitrary censorship for expressing views that go against SJW troon orthodoxy:

MeghanMurphyLolsuitOppositionMotions2DemurrerAndAntiSLAPP.jpg


MeghanMurphyLolsuit.jpg


To give you the TL;DR version, Twitter and the Breitbart lawyers are having a back and forth about whether Meghan has filed this lolsuit for her own sake (to have her account reinstated) or for the greater sake of the general public to prevent further censorship of protected speech.

Twitter argues that Meghan only wants to be freed to bully transpeople and that she is only suing for her own sake, not for the sake of everyone else on Twitter who was or could be similarly censored:

TwitterReplySpecialMotion2Strike01.jpg


"Indeed, Murphy identifies no one else who has been suspended in similar factual circumstances", I thought there was a Twitter account keeping track of all the GCFs, academics and trans people who have been banned on Twitter for going against the SJW cult?

TwitterPersonalStakeVPublicInterest.jpg


Meghan's lawyers argue that there is a public interest motive to Meghan's lolsuit:

MemorandumPublicInterestExemption2AntiSLAPPLiability.jpg


Meghan's lawyers argue that Twitter using anti-SLAPP law to protect itself is abusive:

MeghanMurphyLolsuitTwittersUseOfAntiSLAPPisAbusive.jpg


MeghanMurphyLolsuitTwittersUseOfAntiSLAPPisAbusive02.jpg


In their motion requesting to submit additional evidence showing that Meghan has filed the lolsuit not just for her own sake but for others similarly affected, the Breitbart lawyers bring up the recent suspensions of Dr Ray Blanchard and Greg Scott, Media Director of the Heritage Foundation being similarly censored for seemingly innocuous statements that weren't even tweeted directly at any specific trans person (like Meghan's tweets), merely posted to their own walls for their followers.

MemorandumDrBlanchard.jpg


MemorandumGregScott.jpg
 
Last edited:
Julie Bindel was physically attacked yesterday by that weird UK troon that legally changed his name to cathy brennan


Cathy Brennan Original woke up to a bunch of messages asking if she attacked julie bindel. View attachment 788238

One of the worst things about crazy troons is they make odious scumbags like Bindel and other TERFs somewhat sympathetic figures. Bindel has some batshit crazy and hypocritical views and now she gets to look like a victim.

Anyhow, funny how she’s prattled on for years that men are the worst thing to ever happen and inflict endless violence on women, yet the only men who have physically assaulted her are the ones pretending to be women...
 
One of the worst things about crazy troons is they make odious scumbags like Bindel and other TERFs somewhat sympathetic figures. Bindel has some batshit crazy and hypocritical views and now she gets to look like a victim.

Anyhow, funny how she’s prattled on for years that men are the worst thing to ever happen and inflict endless violence on women, yet the only men who have physically assaulted her are the ones pretending to be women...
How TF is julie bindel an "odious scumbag"? All her political work is centered around helping women and children escape male violence (domestic violence, human trafficking, pimps, etc). She is only lumped in with terfs because she said something transgender issues ten years before anyone else notable tried, but her views are pretty mild. They smeared her extra hard as a warning to the next woman, and it worked pretty well. It's like how jesse singal is called a transphobe all the time.
 
How TF is julie bindel an "odious scumbag"? All her political work is centered around helping women and children escape male violence (domestic violence, human trafficking, pimps, etc). She is only lumped in with terfs because she said something transgender issues ten years before anyone else notable tried, but her views are pretty mild. They smeared her extra hard as a warning to the next woman, and it worked pretty well. It's like how jesse singal is called a transphobe all the time.

Like other radfems she believes men are inherently violent and women must disassociate from them - watch how quickly she blames men and their violent tendencies for everything. She is a Political Lesbian and believes hetereosexual relationships are a form of patriarchal Stockholm Syndrome. If those are mild views then I hate to see what an extreme version of her would think.
 
Back