Whale Wars - tracking (and memeing) a certain pod of twitter attention whores

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date
This tweet implies there is a brain under all that makeup and fake hair somewhere, but it kicked in too late.
I'll give her credit that she's at least realized faster than most of her contemporaries that no confidentiality agreement is far worse for the kickvic side than it is for their opponents.

I don't think she deserves much credit. All she did was notice that this thing that is meant to make her opposition upset has actually made them happy, so maybe it wasn't so great for her side after all. Which does at least put her above the people who believe their narrative so strongly that they just presume any time their opponents celebrate that they're just delusional, rather than that they may actually have a reason to. Which, to be fair, is a large proportion of the #kickvic side.

But yes, the only reason she's started to think that maybe the lack of confidentiality agreement isn't a good thing for MoRon and co. isn't due to her own analysis of the situation, just based on how people like us and Rackets think it's good, so it must in fact be bad. It's merely contrarianism rather than an actual sign of thought going into anything.
 
10,000 Twitter followers? Oh man, Ren. You're just setting the world ablaze with your relevance. What's that? Nobody wants your frumpy, beluga ass cosplaying at their cons? No one's buying your "eight pages" of "content" in Mark Waid and the 30 Other Worthless Faggots: the Comic Book? Your Twitter head-pats and retweets are worth exactly ZERO dollars? Gee, Ren, why doesn't anyone like you?
 
10,000 Twitter followers? Oh man, Ren. You're just setting the world ablaze with your relevance. What's that? Nobody wants your frumpy, beluga ass cosplaying at their cons? No one's buying your "eight pages" of "content" in Mark Waid and the 30 Other Worthless Faggots: the Comic Book? Your Twitter head-pats and retweets are worth exactly ZERO dollars? Gee, Ren, why doesn't anyone like you?

I was in Shane's discord yesterday for a few minutes and she was showing some envy toward's Nick's ability to monetize his stream/discord.
 
I was in Shane's discord yesterday for a few minutes and she was showing some envy toward's Nick's ability to monetize his stream/discord.

The evil cunt should try defending an innocent person instead of trying to lynch one.

For some reason, defending an innocent person against a mob of scum is more popular.

Her dox is in the first post of this thread. His name and their wedding pictures should be there as well. Surprisingly enough Lauren is biologically female as well.

>tfw on kiwi farms so long you assume any "woman" featured is actually a troon
 
I was in Shane's discord yesterday for a few minutes and she was showing some envy toward's Nick's ability to monetize his stream/discord.
Maybe if she stopped screeching on twitter all day she'd learn how to monetize herself
 
I don't think she deserves much credit. All she did was notice that this thing that is meant to make her opposition upset has actually made them happy, so maybe it wasn't so great for her side after all. Which does at least put her above the people who believe their narrative so strongly that they just presume any time their opponents celebrate that they're just delusional, rather than that they may actually have a reason to. Which, to be fair, is a large proportion of the #kickvic side.

But yes, the only reason she's started to think that maybe the lack of confidentiality agreement isn't a good thing for MoRon and co. isn't due to her own analysis of the situation, just based on how people like us and Rackets think it's good, so it must in fact be bad. It's merely contrarianism rather than an actual sign of thought going into anything.
Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't go so far as to give her much credit either. I think we're on the same page. ;)

It's just that when dealing with these people someone who shows even a modicum of analytical ability (even if their conclusions are basically directly lifted from someone else's analysis), and thus that they even noticed that maybe this other conclusion should worry them is like watching an average person landing in the idiocracy future and being a comparative supergenius.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Next Task
Renfamous is having a field day with the idea that the logo in this picture was photoshopped.

D8K8zw9XoAAL-IC.jpg weg.png

I'm not sure why that would matter, but there it is.

787717


Here's a bonus picture from 2014, which was in a different office.

1601335_324596407747709_6644085159169317241_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Renfamous is having a field day with the idea that the BHBH's logo in this picture was photoshopped.

View attachment 787719

View attachment 787722

I'm not sure why that would matter, but there it is.

View attachment 787717

Here's a bonus picture from 2014, which was in a different office.

View attachment 787733
If she wants to focus on that, cool I guess. It doesn't dismiss the fact that they get individual clients who are worth more than Funimation by themselves that are quite comfortable with hiring this firm
 
Renfamous is having a field day with the idea that the logo in this picture was photoshopped.

View attachment 787719

View attachment 787722

I'm not sure why that would matter, but there it is.

View attachment 787717

Here's a bonus picture from 2014, which was in a different office.

View attachment 787733

Oh, Ren. Way to mock the very lawyers who will be deposing you down the line.
I'm sure they will forget this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TLS
Renfamous is having a field day with the idea that the logo in this picture was photoshopped.

View attachment 787719 View attachment 787722

I'm not sure why that would matter, but there it is.

View attachment 787717

Here's a bonus picture from 2014, which was in a different office.

View attachment 787733
Did she have a whale stroke? What a bizarre thing to focus on. Also what even is it trying to say, that they photo-shopped the logo into the wall mid stream? There's so much wrong with it's post I'm a bit flabbergasted.
 
Renfamous is having a field day with the idea that the logo in this picture was photoshopped.

View attachment 787719 View attachment 787722

I'm not sure why that would matter, but there it is.
Hahaha what a dumbass. Very high contrast, sharp edges will show up under error level analysis, because JPEG does the poorest job of encoding those pixels - the error levels are the highest there. You should be able to see the outline. There's nothing suspicious about that. What to really look out for is whether similar levels of contrast show up differently in different parts of the photo; high-contrast areas that don't stand out.
Someone else checked the same image.

That is the actual picture (or the quality level that Twitter bothered to store, at least). Anamorphic Roast Beef Sandwich did the ELA on a screenshot of the thumbnail in the tweet, because she's a moron... of course it was compressed all to shit.

For giggles, I shooped her fat face into the photo and ran an ELA on that.


A few things to note: the picture that I added has a lot of contrast, but it barely shows up in the ELA at all. That's a red flag. The text also looks slightly different where I just erased it and replaced it with some new text. And in the smaller text, you can tell that I moved text around and fiddled with it, because the text isn't all a consistent-looking brightness... some parts are brighter than others.
 

Attachments

  • analysis.jpg
    analysis.jpg
    527.5 KB · Views: 89
  • analysis.png
    analysis.png
    2.3 MB · Views: 105
Renfamous is having a field day with the idea that the logo in this picture was photoshopped.

View attachment 787719 View attachment 787722

I'm not sure why that would matter, but there it is.

View attachment 787717

Here's a bonus picture from 2014, which was in a different office.

View attachment 787733
It's very weird seeing Ty without his beard.
 
Back