Carlos Maza / @gaywonk versus Steven Blake Crowder / @scrowder (#VoxAdpocalypse) - Twitter war between a Canadian in nationality and a Canadian in behavior

[Moccren]

Guys... i think Carlos is gay.

How? How can you possibly know this!?

 

[damian]

Guys... i think Carlos is gay.

Next thing you'll say is that Sonic Fox is gay too.

 

[UA 674]

Guys... i think Carlos is gay.

GG Sherlock Holmes. Case closed. Everyone go home and swallow that demonetization like the jizz that tard drinks.

 

[Empty Donation Box]

Guys... i think Carlos is gay.

Here's your (You)

 

[Ma_Hooty]

This guy isn't a faggot, this guy is...

A Figgot.

I know this isn't a question I ask under the notion of 'owning the libtards', but will the government ever shove these monopolistic companies' feet into the fire due to all of this self-destructive autism? I know that Dorsey(?) and a few other silicon valley players were placed in front of Congress, but it seems like it's one big act.
Nothing has come out of this other than Zuckerborg et al giving them the middle fingers and continue to do what made them get called in front of Congress in the first place.

And I know a business has a right to refuse service, but that line gets extremely blurred once you go online - everyone can see and acquire access to Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat, Patreon, etc.; it's hard to see it as a private business.
Hell, it's already at Orwellian levels now that credit card companies and banks can close your accounts if you got opinions that they don't like.

That is a legit nightmare scenario, these massive corporations who may as well control our livelihoods are capable of destroying said livelihood should you make too much of a scene with the wrong crowd.
They take away your bank account and deny you a credit card, so now you have no money (what employer hands out physical cash these days?).

So you fall behind on your bills.
You fall too far behind on bills, they cut off your utilities.
You can't pay rent or mortgage or your car payment, so it's only a matter or time before you lose your home...
Are you going to go live with friends/family? Who's to say the puritan mob won't go after them, too? Will they even help you?

Isn't there some infringement of our rights somewhere, at least with Americans? They take away our right to say whatever we want to say; they threaten the public with outing our personal information if we decide to shitpost about the wrong person; they can deny access to the money we get and depend on to be able to live in America.

This screeching figgot can keep screeching for the attention he needs to fuel his degenerate lifestyle, I'm more concerned about how easily conglomerates like Wells Fargo and Paypal buckle to said screeching.

 

[Ambidextype]

Rather than targeting small-time lolcows like Steven Crowder, youtube could've gone after lot more annoying channels. Reaction prank content creators, I think most people would approve of banning those worthless shit. But for some reason youtube seems to have the wrong priority all the time.

 

[LateNightComics]

Carlos's tweets are being mass archived right now.
I can't find one that hasn't already been saved. Poor Carlos is about to find out what happens when you take away freedom of speech. He's too busy responding to DFE so keyword search him before he nukes his Twitter page.

 

[The Pink Panther]

Rather than targeting small-time futurecows like Steven Crowder, youtube could've gone after lot more annoying channels. Reaction prank content creators, I think most people would approve of banning those worthless shit. But for some reason youtube seems to have the wrong priority all the time.

FTFY.

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

Another hypocrite.

Spoiler

View attachment 788344View attachment 788343

What is with this "Crowder literally attacked Maza for being gay" argument?

It's literally just mean words on the internet. Maza could just insult Crowder back, or (god forbid) ignore him.

It is okay to throw milkshakes at people tho.

Is it me, or have your takes just been getting dumber recently?

Try this argument on for size.
“It’s okay when WE do it because the people we’re attacking are bad!”.
It’s so mind bogglingly irrational I don’t even know how someone would combat this sort of justification. It’s tyrannical. View attachment 788513

I just love this idiotic argument that "punching up" is necessarily good while "punching down" is necessarily bad, or that "punching up" is necessarily more moral than "punching down".

If some internet random pulls out all the gay ops he can muster to ruin a ten-million-subscriber YouTuber's life over petty bullshit, it's still technically "punching up", but it's still not right. If the content creator calls the rando out, it's still technically "punching down", but he is in the right to do so.

And how is Crowder punching down, or Maza punching up anyway?

 

[scotts_3101]

New milk from the cow, submitted without comment. I think it speaks for itself.

 

[Arm Pit Cream]

Trump is gonna cocktease everybody with alleged legislation and Twitter shitposting about "online free market place of ideas", however in the end it will mean nothing. Said legislation will be significantly weakened and too late.
Generally this type of legislation takes 1.5 years to pass in a functioning White House, even if Trump does go through with legislation it'll be after the 2020 election, when he's likely in an even weaker position.

How could such an inept president breakup the 5 biggest tech companies(Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Google, Facebook) in the world in less then 2 years and worth over 4 trillion dollars?

Edit: Lots of negative ratings, but could anybody tell me how Trump is gonna push through legislation? What else can we do to these mega corporations that have billions of dollars in lobbying? These platforms shouldn't be able to ban people on mass because one journo gets mad during pride month, although they probably had this in the works for awhile.

 

[Empty Donation Box]

That is a legit nightmare scenario, these massive corporations who may as well control our livelihoods are capable of destroying said livelihood should you make too much of a scene with the wrong crowd.
They take away your bank account and deny you a credit card, so now you have no money (what employer hands out physical cash these days?).

So you fall behind on your bills.
You fall too far behind on bills, they cut off your utilities.
You can't pay rent or mortgage or your car payment, so it's only a matter or time before you lose your home...
Are you going to go live with friends/family? Who's to say the puritan mob won't go after them, too? Will they even help you?

In a way, I unironically respect the old KKK more than I respect these faggots. They at least had the balls to show up in person and risk getting shot in the face for their trouble (which did happen at least once during the years the Deacons were active). When they showed up you could claim fear for your life and sling lead. The law recognizes the right to defend yourself over a credible face to face threat. The law needs to evolve.

These faggots hide behind screens on the other side of the country but they're still a mob just like the KKK. They want their victims destroyed, destitute, and dead. How do you defend yourself against that? Spend a $100k+ on a lawyer? We all know most people can't do that.

No, it's just like when the KKK rolled up. All you got is yourself. Now what do you do?

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

Try this argument on for size.
“It’s okay when WE do it because the people we’re attacking are bad!”.
It’s so mind bogglingly irrational I don’t even know how someone would combat this sort of justification. It’s tyrannical.

Spoiler: Blazingly stupid leftist take to Idioit right-wing take

View attachment 788513

Listen, Robo, I'll explain like you're 5.

Crowder, as mediocre as his boomer-targeted gotcha-seeking show is? He's not working for a subsidiary of a massive corporation, nor part of a protected subclass that can demand its' critics be silenced for conduct that is only "hateful" or "phobic" in the subjective, IF you're a whining, thin-skinned hack pretending to be a journalist. The person with the "most privilege" in this case is observably the crying, degenerate pseudo-intellectual Hispanic.

edited for otto-cricket and grandma.

 

[Reverend]

Carlos's tweets are being mass archived right now.
I can't find one that hasn't already been saved. Poor Carlos is about to find out what happens when you take away freedom of speech. He's too busy responding to DFE so keyword search him before he nukes his Twitter page.

He's going to regret going on social media as everything he has ever said in his history is posted online, out of context, and laid bare as his husbands boyfriends ass is for the world to fuck bullettrain style.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Guys... i think Carlos is gay.

The best thing to come out of this is that the left will start calling Figs an alt right hate word. Like the figs they are

 

[Sam Losco]

Why is "Veteran Status" on the list of things you can no longer talk about? Is YT trying to get rid of the stolen valor channels?

 

[ButterBar]

Why is "Veteran Status" on the list of things you can no longer talk about? Is YT trying to get rid of the stolen valor channels?

Veteran status is a fig leaf given to say "see we arent biased this is neutral policy to ban hate speech" by saying you cant make fun of soldiers and veterans.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Veteran status is a fig leaf given to say "see we arent biased this is neutral policy to ban hate speech" by saying you cant make fun of soldiers and veterans.

Who would not give a shit anyway.

 

[Sam Losco]

Veteran status is a fig leaf given to say "see we arent biased this is neutral policy to ban hate speech" by saying you cant make fun of soldiers and veterans.

Yet other professions are not the list so it's still completely ok to say fuck cops or kill pigs, or hate on Trump. Yeah, I see the game they are playing.

 

[TerribleIdeas™]

Yet other professions are not the list so it's still completely ok to say fuck cops or kill pigs, or hate on Trump. Yeah, I see the game they are playing.

I'm guessing it's in there so that idiots like Talia Levin can be made excommunicado when they fuck up, like she did.

Edit - Cognitive Thought milking the outrage train - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gibQY9GYpYc