Nick Rekieta's Weeb Wars videos & livestreams - MULTIPLE SLURS

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, he's just asking for more info on the guy not a full blown dox. Given that he's actively encouraging defendants and other people to continue antagonizing two of his clients, I can see why Ty wants to get in touch.
I edited my post. It is curious that a guy from NC is advising out of state residents on Texas law. Wonder if he's licensed there.

Q&D the guy doesn't seem to be licensed in CA or Texas.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Kosher Salt
I didn't even realize that Douchette was talking to Pridemore. He's not only fucking with Vic's case but fucking with Todd's case. This guy is a serious imbecile.
To those curious

https://twitter.com/jessiepridemore/status/1136837083148894208?s=20

789574


789577


789579
 
Here's this, too:

It looks like that has his office's contact info and a link to their website (under construction, lol). That should be enough, unless you're trying to establish a character profile.
 
This douche guy seems quite a piece of work. A thread dedicated to these superLOLyers might be warranted in the near future depending on the duration and extent of the gay ops.
 
OMG shes pulling a Shane. He said the same exact thing when Ron told him about it.
It's funny, I had just began the process of forgetting all about her but y'know, they always come back. They've already had their info out there, how could they think this is a good idea?
 
Douchette's Facebook:

Campaign website:
 
And there's the demand for retraction, which means she's getting sued and that exemplary damages will be sought.

I thought that that one is in a holding pattern awaiting Habercorn deciding whether to proceed. Granted based on this little shitstorm there's a good chance that he will decide that this problem is not going away otherwise.
 
Hoping for a round of internet lawsports but it seems like this douche guy is a Twitter shitalker only so I doubt it’ll happen. What a digital dummy :mad:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back