Weeb Wars / AnimeGate / #KickVic / #IStandWithVic / #vickicksback - General Discussion Thread

So, Savannah Mega Comic-Con tweeted a video of Vic's panel:

Fan interaction with Vic:






This person even posted a video with Vic:
 
It doesn't really matter, Her story is Vic hit on her when she was 16. Nick said Age of consent at the time was 16 so it doesn't really matter in the end.

I stated earlier that dissecting this photo of a photo has very limited merit, which is true, but I am all for continuing to dissect it, because there are some valid points for lolz, and they did make some valid arguments. I just can't put my eggs into the basket when half of the photos were scanned or something and the others weren't.

For example, the repeated textures on the left side of the side does have some suspicion.
 
Not a photoshop expert or anything like that.

But im seeing people saying this photo michelle posted is photoshopped,

Whats your thoughts

Even TUG thinks the photo is suspicious



If it's not photoshopped then she can just post another picture of it, can't she. I'm not really convinced one way or the other, even with the CSI-Twitter team on the case.

However, what I want to know is why does it matter if it's photoshopped or not? Vic supposedly worked for some type of local media network (I literally can't find any evidence of it but it was called Family Network) in Lynchburg from around 1988 to 1990 being involved in local television and media and what not (including working with his Alma Mater's production of Annie). Whether he showed up or not to the church thing does not prove that any of the other "accounts" of the "story" whatsoever are true.
 
I stated earlier that dissecting this photo of a photo has very limited merit, which is true, but I am all for continuing to dissect it, because there are some valid points for lolz, and they did make some valid arguments. I just can't put my eggs into the basket when half of the photos were scanned or something and the others weren't.

For example, the repeated textures on the left side of the side does have some suspicion.
I am not even clear on what it is being claimed is shopped? Is it just the head? Head and body? Just from a total lay mans perspective if any part of the photo was edited, shouldn't it be fairly easy to find out the original pic it was taken from? I know Vic has had a long career with many photos taken of him, but this is a very early pic, which narrows down the possible origin.
 
Last edited:
We all know he's just going to grift the lions out of their raw steaks.

"Nick is feeding poor orphans to Lions! Not a good look for Vic!"
I am not even clear on what it is being claimed is shopped? Is it just the head? Head and body? Just from a total lay mans perspective any part of the photo was edited, shouldn't it be fairly easy to find out the original pic it was taken from? I know Vic has had a long career with many photos taken of him, but this is a very early pic, which narrows down the possible origin.

It looks like they dropped an entire male body into the picture. It doesn't blend with the fireplace behind it, and one of the legs is clipping through the furniture worse than a PS2 game. And then they may have pasted Vic's face onto that body, as the face doesn't seen to quite match up with the body.
 
I am not even clear on what it is being claimed is shopped? Is it just the head? Head and body? Just from a total lay mans perspective any part of the photo was edited, shouldn't it be fairly easy to find out the original pic it was taken from? I know Vic has had a long career with many photos taken of him, but this is a very early pic, which narrows down the possible origin.
This guy ran it through some scan bullshit. I guess lighting doesnt match shadows and other crap I dont know how to do. Seems like the stuff he points out is suspicious. Take a gander.

 
There's a time and place for optics, and a consideration of position. Considering he's tasked with restoring Vic's career, optics are near paramount to his goal. We're at liberty to not need to care about it, but he should have known better.
Gonna hard disagree with you and move on because your post reads like the same crap people posted during GG when they were attempting to be "better" than their opposition.
 
The people screeching about Ty think that Vic should be in jail. He's not going to change hearts and minds. Consider Mark Zaid. He acts like a fool on Twitter. Is that going to effect the outcome of his client's case? No. Is anyone going to support Ya Boi Zack as a result? Probably not.

792646


792645
 
The people screeching about Ty think that Vic should be in jail. He's not going to change hearts and minds. Consider Mark Zaid. He acts like a fool on Twitter. Is that going to effect the outcome of his client's case? No. Is anyone going to support Ya Boi Zack as a result? Probably not.

View attachment 792646

View attachment 792645
I can't be the only one who's annoyed that this sped said collaborate when they (presumably) meant corroborate.
 
Back