Law Tech Reporter Peter Bright (AKA DrPizza) arrested in FBI sting - Attempted to solicit sex with a 7 and 9 year old, Says it was 'Just a joke, bro!', Mistrial, retrial, and found GUILTY – Sentenced to 12 years in prison

https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/peter-bright-charged-soliciting-sex-minors/ https://archive.fo/hWDIc

https://www.docdroid.net/UMNWMSx/bright.pdf - Criminal complaint


Tech reporter Peter Bright has been arrested for soliciting sex with children online. He was employed by Ars Technica until recently.

A federal complaint alleges that Bright sought to molest a 7- and 9-year-old and met with an undercover agent for this purpose, at which point he was arrested. It also states that Bright claimed to be in a sexual relationship with an 11-year-old. He is currently being held without bail.

According to the complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, an undercover FBI special agent made contact with Bright on KinkD, a social media fetish platform, on April 18.

Bright, using the handle “randomanon,” had responded to a message the agent posted a day prior in which she purported to be a mother seeking to connect with people who could teach her children about “birds and the bees.”

The complaint states that in subsequent messages, the agent informed Bright that she had a 7-year-old daughter and 9-year-old son.

At Bright’s urging, the two then began chatting via WhatsApp, which continued for a few weeks. At times using euphemisms, Bright reportedly wrote of molesting both children and raping the 7-year-old. He also allegedly sent pictures of his penis, and photos of test results showing he did not have any sexually transmitted diseases.

And the award for "Tweets that didn't age well" goes to:

https://twitter.com/DrPizza/status/888205737490612225 https://archive.fo/I14w8

UPDATE: Bright's defense. https://kiwifarms.net/threads/tech-...ested-in-fbi-sting.57179/page-17#post-5963807

UPDATE: Mistrial, retrial in about a month's time, Bright still jailed. https://kiwifarms.net/threads/tech-...ested-in-fbi-sting.57179/page-20#post-6035180

UPDATE: FOUND GUILTY https://kiwifarms.net/threads/tech-...ested-in-fbi-sting.57179/page-20#post-6162548

UPDATE: Sentenced to 12 years in prison https://kiwifarms.net/threads/tech-...ested-in-fbi-sting.57179/page-23#post-7677524
 
Last edited:
It's so weird to me that so many of the virtue signallers who can't shut up about how important consent is and how we live in a rape cutlure get in trouble because they can't keep their hands/dick to themselves. They're like the left's version of Ted Haggard.
No, not quite. Ted Haggard at least had sex with other men, not children.
 
So, purely on morbid curiousity, I fired up the Internet Autism Machine and decided to see if this guy was a particularly big Anti-GG sperg.

Holy shit.

Would it surprise any of you to know that he was in extensive contact with Blowey Zoe for years, as well as a friend of Sarah Nyberg? He was one of her most vocal white knights, and now it's pretty clear why this is.

Also he legitimately believes Trump was caused by GG, and I have nothing witty to say about that.

Seems to me it's pretty clear the Cali tech industry is just a microcosm of what Hollywood and Politics is like, a haven for sexual predators and child molesters. Which would make sense these days considering it eclipses most industries in America in profits. If you want your own game development studio or startup Google company just hand over one of your kids (under 10's preferred). There are some weirdos that go for adults, but they are pretty rare.

You see it all through the industry, with the pushing of baby drag and pro-pedophile pieces in various Cali publications, and the apathy towards employees that raise red flags repeatedly because "they are the right people". What remains of the left is nothing but a bunch of criminal deviants that use progressivism as a corporate shield against criticism. They at their core, have no politics, other than supporting whatever gets them their kicks.
 
Seems to me it's pretty clear the Cali tech industry is just a microcosm of what Hollywood and Politics is like, a haven for sexual predators and child molesters. Which would make sense these days considering it eclipses most industries in America in profits. If you want your own game development studio or startup Google company just hand over one of your kids (under 10's preferred). There are some weirdos that go for adults, but they are pretty rare.

You see it all through the industry, with the pushing of baby drag and pro-pedophile pieces in various Cali publications, and the apathy towards employees that raise red flags repeatedly because "they are the right people". What remains of the left is nothing but a bunch of criminal deviants that use progressivism as a corporate shield against criticism. They at their core, have no politics, other than supporting whatever gets them their kicks.

Preach, you beautiful Dan Aykroyd-sponsored libation.
 
You have to understand, this is a costume. These are low-IQ, creepy fucking weirdos who can't talk to normal people.

Most often their real personalities are so repugnant that few could stand them. So they dress themselves up like 'good allies'. The costume is the same as all others because they want to blend it. Same for pedophiles who work with or near children or pretend to be caring about them. There's a reason people are suspicious of men around kids, because it's a common uniform for abusers to get close to their prey.

Same with this guy. He wanted to get close, in this case to young feminist girls or moms so he could abuse their daughters. It's why most Male feminists are abusers or just plain fucking repulsive. Their personalities are hiding the malignant cancer that they are, be it sexual predators, bullies, sociopaths or so mentally weak and afraid to have their own opinions. I've rarely seen a normal Male feminist. Either they're repugnant pieces of shit hypocrites or they're extremely weak, thirsty men, the kind in poly relationships.
This is why you should be very suspicious of people who want you to view them as moral authorities and say things like "all men are shit do not trust them" You should really hear it as them saying "I AM SHIT. Do not trust ME."

Double quote. I know it's a bit lame but a line from an old song has stuck with me for many years that in my mind perfectly describes those people. It's a Christian song using a congregation, a moral setting, for people that prey on children. It's a good song, look it up.
Black Soul Choir said:
He's the one who sits up close beside you, and when he's there you are alone.

"Every man is evil yes an[d] every man is a liar" unashamed with the wicked tongues [they] sing in the black soul choir

That's the male-feminist and socjus sexpests/pedos in a nutshell.

They're supposed to be for people with heart arrhythmias (they slow the heart down so if it freaks out it is less likely to throw a clot and kill you) and high blood pressure. Also given for anxiety and migraine prevention. But I have definitely heard of people in the performing arts coming by them through various levels of dishonesty and popping them to prevent stage nerves or shaking on stage.

They're also on the WADA prohibited substances list, target shooters and archers(I think) use them to get a steady hand, steady and controlled pulse, no nervous feelings or jitters. It is unusual but I know that some guys load up on them when going out to pick up ladies at bars, to be cool and collected(might be a PUA thing). There's no high associated with them or anything like that, they just temper some reactions in the body.
 
Last edited:
I don't think James Gunn is a pedophile. There's a world of difference between making pedo jokes (like he did), and continuously arguing the age of consent, making references to jailbait and referring to people under the age of consent in sexual terms like this shitstain did.

As much he hid in very plain sight, he was being creepy and predatory towards girls and boys online rather than just making off-colour jokes, and I think there's a big difference between the two. The main question for me is that, seeing as he was basically as obvious as Jimmy Savile, who knew (or at least heavily, heavily suspected) and didn't say anything? Because of all the people who are going to come out say how shocked and surprised they were, how they had no idea - there's going to be a bunch of liars who might not also be predators, but certainly protected one, like Nyburg's defenders.
 
I don't think James Gunn is a pedophile. There's a world of difference between making pedo jokes (like he did), and continuously arguing the age of consent, making references to jailbait and referring to people under the age of consent in sexual terms like this shitstain did.

As much he hid in very plain sight, he was being creepy and predatory towards girls and boys online rather than just making off-colour jokes, and I think there's a big difference between the two. The main question for me is that, seeing as he was basically as obvious as Jimmy Savile, who knew (or at least heavily, heavily suspected) and didn't say anything? Because of all the people who are going to come out say how shocked and surprised they were, how they had no idea - there's going to be a bunch of liars who might not also be predators, but certainly protected one, like Nyburg's defenders.


Precisely. People wanna feel smart. Like they're ahead of the curve and can see what others cannot. The concept of dogwhistling or things like that opens the door to every wannabe psychological profiler or sleuth, and just breeds and invites every kind of paranoia and gay mind reading shit.

My rule of thumb is look for patterns, if anything. The occasional joke isn't indicative of them having child sex dungeons under your nearest Chuck e Cheese. In PizzaPeter's case, he made it painfully obvious with repeated paedophilia references and even calling kids jailbait.
 
Screenshot 2019-06-09 at 08.49.38.png

"Not for my kink"
 
793002

:stress:

I wonder how many pedophiles he communicated with on Twitter. Diming on his fellow sick fucks is the only thing that's gonna save him at this point.
The child robot from Screamers is all he deserves.
 
As much as I am against "guilt by association", were I in the LEO handling this I might open an informal dossier on some of his more vocal peers on Twitter.
You don't get the notion that it's perfectly normal for a mother to hand over her 7 & 9 year old children so you can fuck them out of nowhere. None of this happened in a vacuum. I am almost certain he is embedded in a network of sick fucks.
 
As much as I am against "guilt by association", were I in the LEO handling this I might open an informal dossier on some of his more vocal peers on Twitter.
Considering how tight-knit that pedophile groups tend to be, that's pretty much how law enforcement tends to handle this stuff. You can make a safe bet that dozens of the people he's routinely been talking to are going DFE on their social media accounts as we speak, because pedophiles rarely operate solo, especially if they're as visible and well-connected as Bright was.
 
Considering how tight-knit that pedophile groups tend to be, that's pretty much how law enforcement tends to handle this stuff. You can make a safe bet that dozens of the people he's routinely been talking to are going DFE on their social media accounts as we speak, because pedophiles rarely operate solo, especially if they're as visible and well-connected as Bright was.

Especially given that he both white knighted Nyberg and went all out declaring both Milo and multiple republicans to be guilty of pedophile apologia.

Dude projects more than a Battletech PPC.
 
Dat screencap...
No "is Naruto real" or "how to take a screenshot" or other hilarious tabs? I'm disappointed.

View attachment 793002
:stress:

I wonder how many pedophiles he communicated with on Twitter. Diming on his fellow sick fucks is the only thing that's gonna save him at this point.

The child robot from Screamers is all he deserves.
793087
 
You don't get the notion that it's perfectly normal for a mother to hand over her 7 & 9 year old children so you can fuck them out of nowhere. None of this happened in a vacuum. I am almost certain he is embedded in a network of sick fucks.

Considering how tight-knit that pedophile groups tend to be, that's pretty much how law enforcement tends to handle this stuff. You can make a safe bet that dozens of the people he's routinely been talking to are going DFE on their social media accounts as we speak, because pedophiles rarely operate solo, especially if they're as visible and well-connected as Bright was.

Considering how tight knit and paranoid they are, I'd guess this "UC-1" person was deeply enough embedded in the community they thought she or "she" was one of them. If so, they're probably scattering like roaches right now and one hopes a bunch more will get picked up.

Otherwise this is one of those things like a fed taking out an "Assassin for Hire" ad in some Soldier of Fortune knockoff and having idiots take the bait.

You don't fall for something this obvious without being either incredibly stupid (which this guy may be) and/or it's somehow been normalized because they know others of the same ilk.

As much as I am against "guilt by association", were I in the LEO handling this I might open an informal dossier on some of his more vocal peers on Twitter.

Or just investigate anyone who screeches about Gamergate lol.
 
I don't think James Gunn is a pedophile. There's a world of difference between making pedo jokes (like he did), and continuously arguing the age of consent, making references to jailbait and referring to people under the age of consent in sexual terms like this shitstain did.

As much he hid in very plain sight, he was being creepy and predatory towards girls and boys online rather than just making off-colour jokes, and I think there's a big difference between the two. The main question for me is that, seeing as he was basically as obvious as Jimmy Savile, who knew (or at least heavily, heavily suspected) and didn't say anything? Because of all the people who are going to come out say how shocked and surprised they were, how they had no idea - there's going to be a bunch of liars who might not also be predators, but certainly protected one, like Nyburg's defenders.

This is an extremely important nuance to express, because without it, it becomes easy to sweep under the rug the fact that Ars protected this fucker for DECADES. We really do need to ask who knew what and when over in that community.
 
Back