T. Greg Doucette / Thomas Gregory Doucette / greg_doucette / TGDLaw / fsckemall / lawdevnull / TDot - Super Lawyer, Failed Politician, Captain of The Threadnought, Drowning in Debt

  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Interesting Hypothesis, ConSluttant, Slimy Time and 2 others
  • Feels
Reactions: ZombiU&Me, RemoveKebab, ColtWalker1847 and 1 other person
repentance said:
For that to even be relevant the trial court has to first find that either 1) Ron had the legal right to interfere with a contract as a matter of law or 2) he had a colorable right which was exercised in good faith. Good luck establishing either of those.
Click to expand...

Only the first has any relevance to the TCPA, and there he is literally arguing you have a privilege to break the law, somehow. The second is at best colorable, i.e. to be proven at trial, i.e. not a topic for a special exception or summary judgment or TCPA at all. Good faith is a jury question.

repentance said:
Nick has always said that the battle for Vic's career will be won or lost on social media. He's probably looking at it from that angle, but I don't think it's particularly productive. Better to say your piece once about the Johnny come lately Twitter lawyers and then ignore them. Getting baited into engaging them is exactly what they want.
Click to expand...

It's worth answering actually relevant points that relate to the case, but it's giving undue prominence to some grifter who collects $700 for a vaporware podcast he doesn't even do to even pay attention to him when all he's done is shitpost and talk shit on a Shane level.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Kosher Salt, The Littlest Shitlord, Botchy Galoop and 1 other person
I have zero interest in this guy. He tweets like 400 times a day, which is more than anyone should, but I wanted to archive this just for later use.

rude.png

archive.is

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "Because the Defendants already have qui…

archived 7 Jun 2019 05:11:53 UTC
archive.is archive.is

Keep this behavior in mind the next time you hear "lawyers aren't supposed to act this way" or "he's so unprofessional" or 'he's so rude and toxic and attacks people" about Nick which they've been doing for months since he started covering this topic but are now suddenly okay with.
 
  • DRINK!
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Exterminatus, TAB and 8 others
Urbanmech said:
So he's saying Ron had a legal right to bring up Vic's contract because he was trying to get his own contract?
Click to expand...

If he's saying that, then he's a complete and utter fucking idiot. Or intentionally tossing false hope over to the KickVic side.
 
Pedro Sanchez said:
I have zero interest in this guy. He tweets like 400 times a day, which is more than anyone should, but I wanted to archive this just for later use.

View attachment 793483

Keep this behavior in mind the next time you hear "lawyers aren't supposed to act this way" or "he's so unprofessional" or 'he's so rude and toxic and attacks people" about Nick which they've been doing for months since he started covering this topic but are now suddenly okay with.
Click to expand...

We all knew it will be okay as long as it was someone on their side doing it, we saw it before by how they started cheering for D.C Douglas.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant, Botchy Galoop, GenericReviewerDraco and 2 others
AnOminous said:
Only the first has any relevance to the TCPA, and there he is literally arguing you have a privilege to break the law, somehow.
Click to expand...

Isn't that exactly the situation Nick and Ty have talked about before where the interference with a contract comes about incidentally as a consequence of something privileged - if I recall correctly, they cited a case involving a surgeon.
 
PrinceofAllCucks said:
Holy shit, it's like they're all back at square one, except now they're trying to get the plaintiff's counsel disbarred because "muh turrist kiwi's."
Click to expand...
ok what is he talking about with the hearsay exemptions? That when it concerns reputation anything is admissible?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Kosher Salt, ZombiU&Me, Questioning_Huggers and 2 others
Pedro Sanchez said:
View attachment 793483

Keep this behavior in mind the next time you hear "lawyers aren't supposed to act this way" or "he's so unprofessional" or 'he's so rude and toxic and attacks people" about Nick which they've been doing for months since he started covering this topic but are now suddenly okay with.
Click to expand...

Damn, ths dumbfuck is creating a case against himself. Kind of makes me wonder how much other stupid shit he's going to say before he gets into trouble.
 
  • Agree
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Exterminatus, Questioning_Huggers, Botchy Galoop and 3 others
Army Burger said:
Damn, I thought PULL lacked self-awareness (and they certainly do), but this guy takes the cake.

All of it, because he's fat.
Click to expand...
Only difference is unlike Pull this guy has standards to be held too. Pull is just Tumblrs bitchy middle finger that thinks they're some kind of 4chan, but they're really just that crack headon a street corner yelling at a tree for nickels.
 
Last edited:
repentance said:
He's getting what he wants - a bigger audience with minimal risk.
Click to expand...

He already has more followers. Just his previous crap was getting no RTs/Likes. I bet his pee pee is overly excited now from all the touches.
 
Pedro Sanchez said:
I have zero interest in this guy. He tweets like 400 times a day, which is more than anyone should, but I wanted to archive this just for later use.

View attachment 793483

Keep this behavior in mind the next time you hear "lawyers aren't supposed to act this way" or "he's so unprofessional" or 'he's so rude and toxic and attacks people" about Nick which they've been doing for months since he started covering this topic but are now suddenly okay with.
Click to expand...
How the hell do people take him seriously but not Nick and Ty?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: PrinceofAllCucks, TexOffender, Army Burger and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back