Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger)

Who is Smarter, TJ Church or Marjan Šiklić?


  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
anybody can rape but you need to be an utter scumbag to even utilize seduction.

Can you explain, without using the phrase "Rape apes", "Ape Cocks", "Rape Cocks", "Public Urinals", "Fuckmeat" or "Slut Tax" WHY you think seduction is worse than rape.

Take your time. Seriously. Because All I've gotten from you is that you're bad at seduction, so people who seduce are bad, because you're good. That's not an argument. That's not logic. That's not even cartoon logic. It's just a bunch of words repeated in different patterns.

Wait.

Wait.

Fucking.

@Holden

ARE YOU LITERALLY A GOD DAMNED PARROT WITH TEXT TO SPEECH SOFTWARE?

It all makes perfect sense now.
 
I obviously meant the things people tell me about themselves that I can't check, unless they're obviously incorrect. In case of that person, it was hard to believe him for the reason that he writes here - people who post here are morons. His idea of a thug is likely a decent person.

Anyway, I think I realized why macie accused that man of rape. She claimed he has a wife and children. Having a wife and children is disgusting to modern women, since it shows you're not the kind of man they want - a dumb thug who will just pump and dump them. So she wanted this man removed from society because she was disgusted by the fact that somebody who isn't an optimal choice in terms of evolution right now was free.
I thought girls like dumb thugs?
Do you cheat on your wife? Do you beat your wife? Do you fuck other women? Do you impregnate them?

The more of these are a "no" the more likely you are to be removed from society. Probably by your own "wife", who uses you as a meal ticket.
In america if you beat your wife people will beat you up or the police will come. I had a roommate who much like yourself , liked to smoke meth and rant loudly. My neighbor thought she was my girlfriend and I was beating her so I would always have to flee my own home before the police show up. Here they are all but mandated to arrest the man and place a restraining order on him, the supreme court in the us has decreed they don't need to follow this law, but they don't know and still do it anyhow.

So no beating women in the us, being rumored or even suspected of beating your wife in the us has serious consequences. Even defending yourself against a woman is a highly risky prospect, I had one friend who was chased in his underwear all over his neighborhood while his wife chased him with a kitchen knife, eventually he went into a payphone booth and held it shut with his foot while he called the police.

He was arrested for smacking her some point during this fiasco, I'd met his wife, she was awful and I find the story totally believable, if he wanted to hurt anyone he could have knocked the teeth out of her mouth, he was very strong, so he must not have even been trying to hurt her. You breathe on a woman too hard and you're going to jail dude.
 
Can you explain, without using the phrase "Rape apes", "Ape Cocks", "Rape Cocks", "Public Urinals", "Fuckmeat" or "Slut Tax" WHY you think seduction is worse than rape.

Take your time. Seriously. Because All I've gotten from you is that you're bad at seduction, so people who seduce are bad, because you're good. That's not an argument. That's not logic. That's not even cartoon logic. It's just a bunch of words repeated in different patterns.
Seduction is bad since it means selling yourself as a viable evolutionary choice based on nothing at all but being an obnoxious scumbag. It says nothing about how fair you are, how trusty you are, how moral you are, how much you provide, how well can you take care of a woman and her kids, how well you can raise the kids, how well can you do anything at all.

It's akin to selling a broken car because the salesman was charming.

Men who used seduction in the past were seen as utter scum by everybody. Women despised them to the utmost. Only the craziest, sickest sluts mated them with them. But now they are 99 percent of the population in the West. The start of this tragic change happened when women got suffrage and did was expected from them - voted themselves the government as a provider and a right to cheat on their husbands.

Anybody can rape. But to use seduction you need to be a moron.

I'll give you an example.

We have a thug who uses seduction and a decent, providing man who seems a bit nerdy (just for example). Can both rape? Yes. Can both seduce? No.

You need to be an utterly depraved moron to seduce.

Btw, thanks for this question. Gave me an idea for another article.

*mated with them
 
Seduction is bad since it means selling yourself as a viable evolutionary choice based on nothing at all but being an obnoxious scumbag. It says nothing about how fair you are, how trusty you are, how moral you are, how much you provide, how well can you take care of a woman and her kids, how well you can raise the kids, how well can you do anything at all.

It's akin to selling a broken car because the salesman was charming.

Men who used seduction in the past were seen as utter scum by everybody. Women despised them to the utmost. Only the craziest, sickest sluts mated them with them. But now they are 99 percent of the population in the West. The start of this tragic change happened when women got suffrage and did was expected from them - voted themselves the government as a provider and a right to cheat on their husbands.

Anybody can rape. But to use seduction you need to be a moron.

I'll give you an example.

We have a thug who uses seduction and a decent, providing man who seems a bit nerdy (just for example). Can both rape? Yes. Can both seduce? No.

You need to be an utterly depraved moron to seduce.

Btw, thanks for this question. Gave me an idea for another article.
TL ;DR : Holden sucks at talking to people and seeming like he is an actually good choice and therefore everyone else must be scumbags. He also likes to suck dick.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: namazuros
Seduction is bad since it means selling yourself as a viable evolutionary choice based on nothing at all but being an obnoxious scumbag. It says nothing about how fair you are, how trusty you are, how moral you are, how much you provide, how well can you take care of a woman and her kids, how well you can raise the kids, how well can you do anything at all.

It's akin to selling a broken car because the salesman was charming.

Men who used seduction in the past were seen as utter scum by everybody. Women despised them to the utmost. Only the craziest, sickest sluts mated them with them. But now they are 99 percent of the population in the West. The start of this tragic change happened when women got suffrage and did was expected from them - voted themselves the government as a provider and a right to cheat on their husbands.

Anybody can rape. But to use seduction you need to be a moron.

I'll give you an example.

We have a thug who uses seduction and a decent, providing man who seems a bit nerdy (just for example). Can both rape? Yes. Can both seduce? No.

You need to be an utterly depraved moron to seduce.

Btw, thanks for this question. Gave me an idea for another article.

and you think beating the crap and treating womens like crap is not depraved, according to you those are thugs, and you think those thugs are insane

and now 99% of the world is insane... yeah fuckbot yeah

cmon here take a ero manga of my choice you will find very ... inspirational we are friends right?
 
Seduction is bad since it means selling yourself as a viable evolutionary choice based on nothing at all but being an obnoxious scumbag. It says nothing about how fair you are, how trusty you are, how moral you are, how much you provide, how well can you take care of a woman and her kids, how well you can raise the kids, how well can you do anything at all.

It's akin to selling a broken car because the salesman was charming.

Men who used seduction in the past were seen as utter scum by everybody. Women despised them to the utmost. Only the craziest, sickest sluts mated them with them. But now they are 99 percent of the population in the West. The start of this tragic change happened when women got suffrage and did was expected from them - voted themselves the government as a provider and a right to cheat on their husbands.

Anybody can rape. But to use seduction you need to be a moron.

I'll give you an example.

We have a thug who uses seduction and a decent, providing man who seems a bit nerdy (just for example). Can both rape? Yes. Can both seduce? No.

You need to be an utterly depraved moron to seduce.

Btw, thanks for this question. Gave me an idea for another article.
All these articles you claim to be writing are just you crying about how the world isn't fair because you can't have sex with anyone you want. You really need to fucking grow up kid.
 
@Holden : How does it feel to know that anyone who looks you up online will find an article on you talking about how you tried to have sex with your mom? As the third result no less.
 
-Marjan says women are parasites and whores who only cares about breeding
-he says that women only chooses thugs that beat the crap out of them
-he want to be a thug
-he think thugs are insane
-he said that womens that liked to be beated to death hate him
-he want a equal world
-he doesnt want womens to vote

This guy fails basic math and logic, got it.
 
who doesn't?
the point is that modern western women and their thug overlords want all decent men gone from the gene pool. this was already largely achieved, since everybody today supports seduction, women's suffrage and other atrocities that destroy any incentive to work. if you're not a dumb ape today you better have at least 10 million and keep them extremely well protected. for you won't get a partner in the west, ever.

@Holden : How does it feel to know that anyone who looks you up online will find an article on you talking about how you tried to have sex with your mom? As the third result no less.
i wouldn't know, since that is not the case.
 
Seduction is bad since it means selling yourself as a viable evolutionary choice based on nothing at all but being an obnoxious scumbag.

Citation needed.

It says nothing about how fair you are, how trusty you are, how moral you are, how much you provide, how well can you take care of a woman and her kids, how well you can raise the kids, how well can you do anything at all.

Part of raising children is being naturally likeable enough that they emulate your positive aspects. When a man makes a table laugh at his joke, he's showing a positive evolutionary trait, not a weakness.

Men who used seduction in the past were seen as utter scum by everybody.

Citation needed.

Women despised them to the utmost. Only the craziest, sickest sluts mated them with them. But now they are 99 percent of the population in the West.

If you think evolution happens, how the hell did this fringe group of lunatics out breed the wealthy and noble?

The start of this tragic change happened when women got suffrage and did was expected from them - voted themselves the government as a provider and a right to cheat on their husbands.

That was 100 years ago, and you are absolutely terrible at math. Or at biology. How fast do you think human's breed? We're not fruit flies.

Anybody can rape. But to use seduction you need to be a moron.

Actually just being intelligent is a very seductive trait to some people. Because everyone is different, and is attracted to different things, and some people dig the large craniums.

I'll give you an example.

We have a thug who uses seduction and a decent, providing man who seems a bit nerdy (just for example). Can both rape? Yes. Can both seduce? No.

You need to be an utterly depraved moron to seduce.

That's not an example. That's you saying random shit with no conclusion. My parrot theory stands strong btw.

A decent providing man who's a nerd can seduce some girls by blushing and saying "Well I'm kind of a nerd sometimes." He doesn't get to pick which girl that works on, because that's not how seduction works. The thug in your example (Who has no personality traits, because we're being totally fair and unbiased in your presentation) could get rejected by a shy nerdy girl and get the cops called on him if he presses on too strongly.

Also, your entire thought process is based on the idea that men are the active partner and women are always passive sperm receptacles. Women seduce men all the time. You show off your positive side, and you hope for the best.

All of your bullshit is completely lacking in qualifiers. "Thug" means nothing in your example. "Decent, providing man" means nothing in your example. "a bit nerdy" means nothing in your example. You're using descriptive terms that have nothing to do with the situation presented, and jumping to your own foregone conclusion given how you feel about those descriptors.

You're a shitty scientist. But if you put on a labcoat, I'll forgive you, because a parrot wearing a labcoat would be so adorable oh my god.


Btw, thanks for this question. Gave me an idea for another article.

Please.

History needs very explicit examples of why your ideology was completely fucking wrong.
 
the point is that modern western women and their thug overlords want all decent men gone from the gene pool. this was already largely achieved, since everybody today supports seduction, women's suffrage and other atrocities that destroy any incentive to work. if you're not a dumb ape today you better have at least 10 million and keep them extremely well protected. for you won't get a partner in the west, ever.
"Decent men". Have you looked in a fucking mirror bro? No intelligent woman would want your genetics anywhere near her.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Saney
the point is that modern western women and their thug overlords want all decent men gone from the gene pool. this was already largely achieved, since everybody today supports seduction, women's suffrage and other atrocities that destroy any incentive to work. if you're not a dumb ape today you better have at least 10 million and keep them extremely well protected. for you won't get a partner in the west, ever.
So yeah, if you didn't know I've had 3 relationships end in the last 2 years (one went for 2 years the others for 6 months) and i'm well employed an also am in school, which unlike yours is accredited. I'm smarter, better looking, and more able to make money than you and all my relationships have lasted longer. Also guess what: None of them had a relationship going on when I started dating them and none ever cheated on me and I never cheated on them. So you're wrong.
 
the point is that modern western women and their thug overlords want all decent men gone from the gene pool. this was already largely achieved, since everybody today supports seduction, women's suffrage and other atrocities that destroy any incentive to work. if you're not a dumb ape today you better have at least 10 million and keep them extremely well protected. for you won't get a partner in the west, ever.

but you want to be a thug and dont want to do the first step, also i got less money because my country is a piece of shit and i got laid more than you
 
i wouldn't know, since that is not the case.

wrong.png
Guess again
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
Reactions: Saney and 4Macie
Citation needed.
Part of raising children is being naturally likeable enough that they emulate your positive aspects. When a man makes a table laugh at his joke, he's showing a positive evolutionary trait, not a weakness.
I'm sorry, I though you wanted a serious discussion. This isn't it. It's you trolling or just being an utter moron. Your first two replies ask for a citation about somebody being a scumbag (wtf?) but then automatically assume he is likable. Seducers aren't likable. If you believe they are check PUAs. They are anything but likable and are tutors of seduction.

Btw, I'd like to thank that Mexican moron for this article


The paradox of incel in modern society
Posted on January 9, 2015 by caamib
As I often claim, the entire mainstream modern Western society is a mixture of dogma, insanity and lies.

For example, I am often told that we incels only see women as fuckmeat. And in a sense I can understand those saying it, since it is important to remember that these monsters have no sense of what any relationship is – pumping and dumping is all their parents and friends knew. So it comes of little surprise that they are like this as well – they have no other concepts to even comprehend. When they hear about male-female relationships they hear sex, for nothing else exists to them. It is important to remember that.

Because seeing women as fuckmeat is exactly how thugs, the sacred group worshiped by women, sees them. A thug breeds a woman and then can’t stand her anymore so he goes on to breed the next woman – an optimal behavior in a feral, sick world where relationships are a concept as foreign as halberds or Aztec rituals.

If what these crazies were saying was true about incels they wouldn’t be incels !

So what is the truth?

Incels are often (but not always, there are also completely declined, modernist incels) those who make the mistake of offering women humane treatment, relationship and such things. Things that modern women no longer understand and are thus hated. It is like trying to put a wild animal in a cage. It won’t like the cage nor you. And liberalism is supporting this. Its telling incels that it is wrong to treat women like cattle and that it is good to treat women like they deserve respect. So what happens? Incels do so, fail and then get blamed and told they actually acted like they see women as cattle. But they didn’t! They acted just the way you told them – they treated women like entities worthy of respect. Had they treated them like cattle they’d be successful.

And onwards goes this crazy lie, repacked and sold over and over again, sadly to usually the same naive idiots.

It’s the same with another modernist myth, the idea that modern women don’t like rape.

The only “rapists” sent to prison are falsely accused men who women want to get rid of because they’re not immoral and stupid enough. That is a crime today, not rape. In fact, if you don’t actually rape your chances of being accused of rape are much, much higher.

Honestly, if you’re not able to recognize it by now maybe it is better that you don’t reproduce. I’d just recommend also not working so you don’t make even more men incel, but I fear even that is beyond the comprehension skills of such morons.

petro - not the case. i'll let somebody sane tell you why
 
Not sure why Holden thinks I imprisoned a "poor man". He was a rapist. I wasn't the only girl he'd raped. I was just one of the last before he was caught. Holden assumes this man was a provider. I'm not sure why he'd just assume that every rapist is an honest and good man... I won't got into the full details, because they'll just make Holden hard, but the only reason the wife was with the husband still (he abused her) was because he made more money than she did and threatened to use that money to take the kids away from her forever if she left him. Of course, all holden will see in this is that she stayed with him; and he'll reason that she liked it.

But she didn't. We all know she didn't. But she couldn't risk losing her kids to an abusive man and she sure as hell didn't make enough money to fight him for the kids. So she stayed, not because she loved her abuser or because she loved abuse, she stayed for her kids. This woman was an amazing woman to put up with that abuse all day every day for her kids. Her husband was not a good man. He was abusive and not a supporter/provider in any way shape or form. Am I glad he's in prison? Fuck yes I am.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back