- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
Given the hint that Nick provided that the perp already has a thread on the Farms, @AnOminous believes our perp might be this lolcow:
Has Vordrak been involved with KickVic at all?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Given the hint that Nick provided that the perp already has a thread on the Farms, @AnOminous believes our perp might be this lolcow:
Has Vordrak been involved with KickVic at all?
Not that I am aware, but he maybe acting on his own to stir the pot with @Null and Nick plus anyone else that believes his BS.
Yep! Clearly Sexual Assault the way they define it.
Never mind, I'm an idiot. I was confusing Adam Sheehan (who threw Todd under the boss with the Pridemore accusations) with this Jamie guy.Why Todd Haberkorn?
Besides Pridemore, the only other person I see getting deposed in that case is possibly Adam Sheehan.
Other way around. The person impersonating Nick told them that he ("Nick") wanted to pay Buzzfeed in exchange for them taking down some article that they'd published.Not sure about BHBH but for Nick it sounded like they were trying to get Buzzfeed to wire Nick money by using a fake letterhead of Nicks firm.
The really weird part is that then Buzzfeed was just like "sure, we'll send you our banking info so you can wire us the money, ok?"a BuzzFeed writer allegedly received a
communication from my office okay so it
was a communication from Rekieta Law
purportedly now it wasn't on my
letterhead and it just used my law logo
and purported to be me
it wasn't from my law firm's email
address so but this letter went to a
BuzzFeed freelance writer and demanded
that they take down some publication
that they had made and offered to pay
them eight thousand dollars to take down
the publication
Other way around. The person impersonating Nick told them that he ("Nick") wanted to pay Buzzfeed in exchange for them taking down some article that they'd published.
YT's transcription:
The really weird part is that then Buzzfeed was just like "sure, we'll send you our banking info so you can wire us the money, ok?"
I don't know if they just wanted to see whether Nick was really serious, but them accepting the bribe would be highly unprofessional, just as it would've been if Nick was actually offering one...
So the other side is resorting to criminal activity now. Interesting. They must be very confident in their case.
So the other side is resorting to criminal activity now. Interesting. They must be very confident in their case.
There's a specific statuteTexas Penal Code - PENAL § 38.122. Falsely Holding Oneself Out as a Lawyer
![]()
Texas Penal Code § 38.122 | FindLaw
Texas Penal Code PENAL TX PENAL Section 38.122. Read the code on FindLawcodes.findlaw.com
Texas Penal Code - PENAL § 38.123. Unauthorized Practice of Law
![]()
Texas Penal Code § 38.123 | FindLaw
Texas Penal Code PENAL TX PENAL Section 38.123. Read the code on FindLawcodes.findlaw.com
There's a caveat, though: "with intent to obtain an economic benefit for himself or herself".
Sec. 33.07. ONLINE IMPERSONATION. (a) A person commits an offense if the person, without obtaining the other person's consent and with the intent to harm, defraud, intimidate, or threaten any person, uses the name or persona of another person to:
(1) create a web page on a commercial social networking site or other Internet website; or
(2) post or send one or more messages on or through a commercial social networking site or other Internet website, other than on or through an electronic mail program or message board program.
(b) A person commits an offense if the person sends an electronic mail, instant message, text message, or similar communication that references a name, domain address, phone number, or other item of identifying information belonging to any person:
(1) without obtaining the other person's consent;
(2) with the intent to cause a recipient of the communication to reasonably believe that the other person authorized or transmitted the communication; and
(3) with the intent to harm or defraud any person.
(c) An offense under Subsection (a) is a felony of the third degree. An offense under Subsection (b) is a Class A misdemeanor,
Hmm not sure if they are talking about the Email thing or that Cohen Lawyers "Nick did a crime" thing. Later on in the chain it they mentioned that Nick would be in round 2 so its hard to tell.So the timing of this letter shit coincides with that nasty ass professional contrarian's tweet. Idiot also brags about being tech savvy.
View attachment 796014
(already archived) http://archive.li/b9ATk
The email made a specific demand for money in a quid pro quo. That is extortion. Felony!
Oh please no, don't be Vordrak.Given the hint that Nick provided that the perp already has a thread on the Farms, @AnOminous believes our perp might be this lolcow:
Oh. Oh my. What if that Professional Contrarian's big "oh Nick's gonna regret it now" thing is... a hit piece claiming he was trying to extort money from Buzzfeed?
It wouldnt, paying off the media is the bread and butter business for some lawyers. It would only look bad for Buzzfeed.I don't know if they just wanted to see whether Nick was really serious, but them accepting the bribe would be highly unprofessional, just as it would've been if Nick was actually offering one...
Jesus christ. Do you have to retroactively ask for consent for every pass you've made at any woman during your lifetime these days?
Crap like this makes me glad that I am divorced and have sworn off woman forever.