T. Greg Doucette / Thomas Gregory Doucette / greg_doucette / TGDLaw / fsckemall / lawdevnull / TDot - Super Lawyer, Failed Politician, Captain of The Threadnought, Drowning in Debt

Tobias said:
I can't help but wonder if his need for a CPAP means he's got some real fucked health conditions that makes it so he quite literally can do nothing but shitpost on twitter but as to what he has I got no clue.
Click to expand...
Crippling ADD/ADHD would do it. His brain is permanently starved for dopamine so he frantically chases after those tiny but frequent dopamine hits whenever he's replied to, liked, or retweeted. I've seen it in people who were legitimately diagnosed. He probably would benefit from ADD/ADHD drugs and/or nutritional supplements such as tyrosine or N-acetyl-tyrosine (the amino acid precursor to dopamine, which also upregulates its production), tetrahydrobiopterin aka pteridin-4 (a vital cofactor for synthesis of dopamine, serotonin, tyrosine, and nitric oxide), and folinic acid (folate is an important cofactor in tetrahydrobiopterin recycling, but in some cases including in autism folate transport across the blood-brain barrier can be blocked, requiring the folinate form instead).

Of course as a likely narcissist (considering his lying, his political ambitions and his "Super Lawyer" status) he's not going to listen to anyone telling him that there's actually something wrong with his brain and frankly it's better that way as it makes him less dangerous; all narcissist are fundamentally harmful to others and need to be hindered at every turn.

I wonder if it could be used against him should he ever be sued for defamation by any or all of Nick, Vic, or Ty? Reckless disregard for the truth counts, and when the hell does he even have the time to read and contemplate the case he's so aggressively posting about? Indeed, if his ADD/ADHD is that bad, he literally can't and absolutely everything he has to say about it is talking out his ass. Not to mention that his literal addiction to getting asspats from these clowns prevents him from being honest; he can't mention any conclusion that KickVic doesn't want to hear.
 
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Far Queue and Questioning_Huggers
Greg thinks he's destroying Nick's reputation:
797412

archive.fo

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "Only in North Carolina though Gonna tak…

archived 12 Jun 2019 22:55:59 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: mindlessobserver
Just something to think about. This whole superlawyer thing just sounds like a circle jerking contest. Makes sense why people are glued to Twitter for clout.

www.superlawyers.com

Selection Process Detail

Selection Process Detail
www.superlawyers.com www.superlawyers.com
 
The Littlest Shitlord said:
I wonder if it could be used against him should he ever be sued for defamation by any or all of Nick, Vic, or Ty? Reckless disregard for the truth counts, and when the hell does he even have the time to read and contemplate the case he's so aggressively posting about?
Click to expand...

He could be sued for defamation per se (fraud is a crime, he outright stated Nick was committing fraud), with both knowing the falsity and reckless disregard for the truth supporting actual malice. There are things that every lawyer SHOULD know, and either he failed law school or he knows it's false.

I expect some interesting things to come out during discovery in regards to him... If there was any contact between him and the parties (or others implicated in the civil conspiracy claim) prior to him starting to tweet about it in regards to certain topics, then he's in for a treat. Honestly, there are hints that he's actively working with others to attack Nick/Vic/Ty, and that's concerning.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TerribleIdeas™, CountSarmale, Questioning_Huggers and 1 other person
Soviras said:
He could be sued for defamation per se (fraud is a crime, he outright stated Nick was committing fraud), with both knowing the falsity and reckless disregard for the truth supporting actual malice. There are things that every lawyer SHOULD know, and either he failed law school or he knows it's false.

I expect some interesting things to come out during discovery in regards to him... If there was any contact between him and the parties (or others implicated in the civil conspiracy claim) prior to him starting to tweet about it in regards to certain topics, then he's in for a treat. Honestly, there are hints that he's actively working with others to attack Nick/Vic/Ty, and that's concerning.
Click to expand...
He could also be in trouble with the bar for any number of reasons. He's either deliberately misrepresented the law to chase clout, or he's incompetent, possibly too incompetent to be allowed to represent clients. He's libeled his fellow lawyers. He's provided bad legal advice to people he has no qualifications to advise. His very public display of social media addiction is as much of a disgrace as being publicly passed out in a pool of his own vomit. He calls himself a "super lawyer", something that there have been ominous rumbles about from professional legal ethicists. In short, his conduct brings the profession into disrepute.

It's more likely that he ends up in trouble with the bar somehow than that he gets sued, though, because even though "a lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client", he has literally nothing better to do than file endless bullshit motions on his own behalf. Even though many of these will be complete nonsense that only hurt him in the end, they will still each require a finite amount of the time and attention of an actually competent lawyer and this could get very expensive. I personally would be very reluctant to sue a lawyer even with good cause unless I was a multi-millionaire.

Should Nick and/or Ty sue him personally, they too would suffer the competency handicaps of a self-representing lawyer. Normally I'd say they could still very likely win, given that they aren't social media addicts with questionable brain oxygenation, but they do have a couple of disadvantages of their own. The first one is that they both get mad over stupid malicious legal bullshit, and we know that Doucette will provide that in steaming abundance. The second is that they have to keep in mind the public reactions to their actions; Nick has to do this because of his profitable streaming, and Ty has to keep in mind that anything that makes him look bad will impair his ability to serve his client in the PR arena. They'll probably still win anyway but it could get messy.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Coach Kreeton Of All That, TerribleIdeas™, ZombiU&Me and 6 others
some_crazy said:
Greg now strait up calling Vic a sexual predator - have his comments reached the point of actionable now?

archive.fo

T. Greg Doucette on Twitter: "These aren't comments *from* Vic, they'…

archived 12 Jun 2019 23:41:53 UTC
archive.fo archive.fo
View attachment 797494
Archive link for the comments he linked: https://archive.fo/qeGDD
Click to expand...
If I wanted to lawyerese that, I would say Douchette is referring to Vic's reputation as a sexual predator, which, sadly, at this point has some bite to it. There's a not insignificant number of people who think he's a predator, whether it's objectively true or not.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant, Questioning_Huggers and repentance
Kiomei said:
Powerlevel, don't give a fuck. I've definitely got a thing for asians, this chick should get out while she can, this dude is nothing but bad news.
Click to expand...

I bet she leaves him because this cuck is so busy white knighting online whores that he barely even talks to her, much like Arthur Chu got dumped because while being an online woke feminist, he was emotionally abusive and distant to the one woman in his life.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: TerribleIdeas™, ZombiU&Me, Questioning_Huggers and 3 others
AnOminous said:
I bet she leaves him because this cuck is so busy white knighting online whores that he barely even talks to her, much like Arthur Chu got dumped because while being an online woke feminist, he was emotionally abusive and distant to the one woman in his life.
Click to expand...
You think that's why he went with the dopey looking girl? It would make sense, she hasn't had the sense to leave him during a 10 year relationship with no higher commitment and he seems pleased with engaging the fat ass blue thot first, followed by Thotmore.
 
repentance said:
Why are people engaging him? Anyone with almost 150,000 tweets is self-important and only wants to hear their own opinions reflected back to them.
Click to expand...
No doubt. I noted this and stopped engaging him after I realized just how unhinged this dude actually was replying to every no one who had the audacity to tweet at him, and the way he did it. not just replying, he would retweet your tweet with his own reply above it in order to boost his numbers.

It would be sad if it wasn't so exceptional.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ConSluttant, Sketcher and Botchy Galoop
some_crazy said:
Greg now strait up calling Vic a sexual predator - have his comments reached the point of actionable now?
Click to expand...

I don't think that's in any way actionable. If I were to make a tweet or write an article on some of the stuff Ron has said, I'd merely be reporting statements made by another party. If this were actionable, you couldn't have a functional press.
 
Far Queue said:
I don't think that's in any way actionable. If I were to make a tweet or write an article on some of the stuff Ron has said, I'd merely be reporting statements made by another party. If this were actionable, you couldn't have a functional press.
Click to expand...

Yep he's being careful with his wording. He's speaking based on something he can reference to be true.
 
Far Queue said:
I don't think that's in any way actionable. If I were to make a tweet or write an article on some of the stuff Ron has said, I'd merely be reporting statements made by another party. If this were actionable, you couldn't have a functional press.
Click to expand...

You can't just repeat things as a journalist. You have to exercise due diligence in ascertaining whether it's true or not. Even against a limited public figure, you still have to act without reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of claims that you adopt as your own.

TexOffender said:
Yep he's being careful with his wording. He's speaking based on something he can reference to be true.
Click to expand...

Not really. He's outright accused Nick of wire fraud based on absolutely nothing and with access to easily available information that shows this to be false.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Zero Day Defense and Botchy Galoop
AnOminous said:
You can't just repeat things as a journalist. You have to exercise due diligence in ascertaining whether it's true or not. Even against a limited public figure, you still have to act without reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of claims that you adopt as your own.



Not really. He's outright accused Nick of wire fraud based on absolutely nothing and with access to easily available information that shows this to be false.
Click to expand...
Would filing an ethics complaint of that level protect ole greg from any repercussions?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back